Pose scaling: Geometrical assessment of ligand binding poses

Journal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 833-852

  Zhong, Shijun ^a   MacKerell Jr , Alexander D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding pose; Binding site; Docking; Geometrical match; Scoring function

Indexed keywords

EID: 51449094597     PISSN: 02196336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219633608004155     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE, Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: Successes and gaps, J Med Chem 49:5851-5855, 2006.
2. Zhong S, Macias AT, MacKerell AD, Jr, Computational identification of inhibitors of protein-protein interactions, Curr Top Med Chem 7:63-82, 2007.
3. Kontoyianni M, Madhav P, Suchanek E, Seibel W, Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: A beaten field? Curr Med Chem 15:107-116, 2008.
4. Liu ZM, Huang CK, Fan KQ, Wei P, Chen H, Liu SY, Pei JF, Shi L, Li B, Yang K, Liu Y, Lai LH, Virtual screening of novel noncovalent inhibitors for SARS-CoV 3C-like proteinase, J. Chem. Inform. Model. 45:10-17, 2005.
5. Lu IL, Mahindroo N, Liang PH, Peng YH, Kuo CJ, Tsai KC, Hsieh HP, Chao YS, Wu SY, Structure-based drug design and structural biology study of novel nonpeptide inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus main protease, J Med Chem 49:5154-5161, 2006.
6. Furci LM, Lopes P, Eakanunkul S, Zhong S, MacKerell AD, Jr, Wilks A, Inhibition of the bacterial heme oxygenases from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria meningitidis: Novel antimicrobial targets, J Med Chem 50:3804-3813, 2007.
7. Huang N, Nagarsekar A, Xia GJ, Hayashi J, MacKerell AD, Jr, Identification of non-phosphate-containing small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase p56 Lck SH2 domain via in silico screening against the pY+3 binding site, J Med Chem 47:3502-3511, 2004.
8. Chen F, Hancock CN, Macias AT, Joh J, Still K, Zhong S, MacKerell AD, Jr, Shapiro P, Characterization of ATP-independent ERK inhibitors identified through in silico analysis of the active ERK2 structure, Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:6281-6287, 2006.
9. Bowman AL, Nikolovska-Coleska Z, Zhong H, Wang S, Carlson HA, Small molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction discovered by ensemble-based receptor models, J Am Chem Soc 129:12809-12814, 2007.
10. Laurie AT, Jackson RM, Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening, Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:395-406, 2006.
11. Zhong S, MacKerell AD, Jr, Binding response: A descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces, J Chem Inf Model 47:2303-2315, 2007.
12. Brylinski M, Skolnick J, A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:129-134, 2008.
13. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions, Proteins 47:409-443, 2002.
14. Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID, Molecular recognition and docking algorithms, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 32:335-373, 2003.
15. Wong CF, Flexible ligand-flexible protein docking in protein kinase systems, Biochim Biophys Acta 1784:244-251, 2008.
16. Wang R, Lu Y, Fang X, Wang S, An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDB-bind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:2114-2125, 2004.
17. Jain AN, Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking, Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:407- 420, 2006.
18. Rajamani R, Good AC, Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: Current trends in scoring function development, Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 10:308-315, 2007.
19. Pan Y, Huang N, Cho S, MacKerell AD, Jr, Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:267-272, 2003.
20. Lipinski CA, Lead- and drug-like compounds: The rule-of-five revolution, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 1:337-341, 2004.
21. Gorse AD, Diversity in medicinal chemistry space, Curr Top Med Chem 6:3-18, 2006.
22. Szabo A, Ostlund NS, Modern Quanutm Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory (Dover Publications, New York, 1996.)
23. Verdonk ML, Cole JC, Hartshorn MJ, Murray CW, Taylor RD, Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD, Proteins 52:609-623, 2003.
24. Moustakas DT, Lang PT, Pegg S, Pettersen E, Kuntz ID, Brooijmans N and Rizzo RC, Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5, J Comput Aided Mol Des 20:601-619, 2006.
25. Schellhammer I, Rarey M, FlexX-Scan: Fast, structure-based virtual screening, Proteins 57:504-517, 2004.
26. Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky MP, Knoll EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P, Shenkin PS, Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy, J Med Chem 47:1739-1749, 2004.
27. Krammer A, Kirchhoff PD, Jiang X, Venkatachalam CM, Waldman M, LigScore: A novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities, J Mol Graph Model 23:395- 407, 2005.
28. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhu Q, Zhou Y, A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes, J Med Chem 48:2325-2335, 2005.
29. Muegge I, J Med Chem 49:5895-5902, 2006.
30. Yang CY, Wang R, Wang S, M-score: A knowledge-based potential scoring function accounting for protein atom mobility, J Med Chem 49:5903-5911, 2006.
31. Oda A, Tsuchida K, Takakura T, Yamaotsu N, Hirono S, Comparison of consensus scoring strategies for evaluating computational models of protein-ligand complexes, J Chem Inf Model 46:380-391, 2006.
32. Teramoto R, Fukunishi H, Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening, J Chem Inf Model 48:288-295, 2008.
33. Kramer B, Rarey M, Lengauer T, Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking, Proteins 37:228-241, 1999.
34. Ewing TJ, Makino S, Skillman AG, Kuntz ID, DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases, J Comput Aided Mol Des 15:411-428, 2001.
35. Cecchini M, Kolb P, Majeux N, Caflisch A, Automated docking of highly flexible ligands by genetic algorithms: A critical assessment, J Comput Chem 25:412-422, 2004.
36. Liu M, Wang S, MCDOCK: A Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem, J Comput Aided Mol Des 13:435-451, 1999.
37. Gupta A, Gandhimathi A, Sharma P, Jayaram B, ParDOCK: An all atom energy based Monte Carlo docking protocol for protein-ligand complexes, Protein Pept Lett 14:632-646, 2007.
38. Baxter CA, Murray CW, Waszkowycz B, Li J, Sykes RA, Bone RG, Perkins TD, Wylie W, New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases, J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:254-262, 2000.
39. Jackson RM, Q-fit: A probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by sampling low energy conformational space, J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:43-57, 2002.
40. Erickson JA, Jalaie M, Robertson DH, Lewis RA, Vieth M, Lessons in molecular recognition: The effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy, J Med Chem 47:45-55, 2004.
41. Sherman W, Day T, Jacobson MP, Friesner RA, Farid R, Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects, J Med Chem 49:534-553, 2006.
42. Graves AP, Brenk R, Shoichet BK, Decoys for docking, J Med Chem 48:3714-3728, 2005.
43. Tong L, Warren TC, King J, Betageri R, Rose J, Jakes S, Crystal structures of the human p56lck SH2 domain in complex with two short phosphotyrosyl peptides at 1.0 A and 1.8 A resolution, J Mol Biol 256:601-610, 1996.
44. Richards FM, Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure, Annu Rev Biophys Bio-eng 6:151-176, 1977.
45. Connolly M, Analytical molecular surface calculation, J Appl Cryst 16:548-558, 1983.
46. Connolly ML, Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids, Science 221:709-713, 1983.
47. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE, UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis, J Comput Chem 25:1605-1612, 2004.
48. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE, A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions, J Mol Biol 161:269-288, 1982.
49. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K, VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J Mol Graph 14:33-38:27-38, 1996.
50. Hetenyi C, van der Spoel D, Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site, Protein Sci 11:1729-1737, 2002.
51. Hetenyi C, van der Spoel D, Blind docking of drug-sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues, FEBS Lett 580:1447-1450, 2006.