Binding response: A descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2303-2315

  Zhong, Shijun ^a   Mackerell, Alexander D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LIGANDS; PROTEINS; SCREENING;

BINDING RESPONSE; LIGAND-PROTEIN INTERACTION; NOVEL DESCRIPTOR;

BINDING SITES;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 37249062102     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci700149k     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Jones, S.; Thornton, J. M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.SA. 1996, 93, 13-20.
2. Janin, J.; Wodak, S. J. Protein modules and protein-protein interaction. Introduction. Adv. Protein Chem. 2002, 61, 1-8.
3. Szilagyi, A.; Grimm, V.; Arakaki, A. K.; Skolnick, J. Prediction of physical protein-protein interactions. Phys. Biol. 2005, 2, S1-S16.
4. Femandez-Ballester, G.; Serrano, L. Prediction of protein-protein interaction based on structure. Methods Mol. Biol. (Totowa, NJ, U.S.) 2006, 340, 207-234.
5. Pagliaro, L.; Felding, J.; Audouze, K.; Nielsen, S. J.; Terry, R. B.; Krog-Jensen, C.; Butcher, S. Emerging classes of protein-protein interaction inhibitors and new tools for their development. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 442-449.
6. Barril, X.; Hubbard, R. E.; Morley, S. D. Virtual screening in structurebased drug discovery. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 779-791.
7. Ghosh, S.; Nie, A.; An, J.; Huang, Z. Structure-based virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 194-202.
8. Zhong, S.; Macias, A. T.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Computational Identification of Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 63-82.
9. Sheinerman, F. B.; Giraud, E.; Laoui, A. High affinity targets of protein kinase inhibitors have similar residues at the positions energetically important for binding. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 352, 1134-1156.
10. Chen, R.; Mintseris, J.; Janin, J.; Weng, Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003, 52, 88-91.
11. Chen, Y.; Xu, D. Computational analyses of high-throughput protein-protein interaction date. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2003, 4, 159-181.
12. Zhou, H. X. Improving the understanding of human genetic diseases through predictions of protein structures and protein-protein interaction sites. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 539-549.
13. Shi, T. L.; Li, Y. X.; Cai, Y. D.; Chou, K. C. Computational methods for protein-protein interaction and their application. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2005, 6, 443-449.
14. Chen, F.; Hancock, C. N.; Macias, A. T.; Joh, J.; Still, K.; Zhong, S.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Shapiro, P. Characterization of ATP-independent ERK inhibitors identified through in silico analysis of the active ERK2 structure. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 6281-6287.
15. Hancock, C. N.; Macias, A.; Lee, E. K.; Yu, S. Y.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Shapiro, P. Identification of novel extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4586-4595.
16. Cosgrove, D. A.; Bayada, D. M.; Johnson, A. P. A novel method of aligning molecules by local surface shape similarity. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 573-591.
17. Tsodikov, O. V.; Record, M. T., Jr.; Sergeev, Y. V. Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature. J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 600-609.
18. Coleman, R. G.; Burr, M. A.; Souvaine, D. L.; Cheng, A. C. An intuitive approach to measuring protein surface curvature. Proteins 2005, 61, 1068-1074.
19. Neuvirth, H.; Raz, R.; Schreiber, G. ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identify the location of protein-protein binding sites. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338, 181-199.
20. Yang, A. Y.; Kallblad, P.; Mancera, R. L. Molecular modelling prediction of ligand binding site flexibility. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2004, 18, 235-250.
21. Nayal, M.; Honig, B. On the nature of cavities on protein surfaces: application to the identification of drug-binding sites. Proteins 2006, 63, 892-906.
22. Liang, S.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S.; Zhou, Y. Protein binding site prediction using an empirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 3698-3707.
23. Connolly, M. Analytical molecular surface calculation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 548-558.
24. Connolly, M. L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science 1983, 221, 709-713.
25. Sotriffer, C.; Klebe, G. Identification and mapping of small-molecule binding sites in proteins: computational tools for structure-based drug design. Farmaco 2002, 57, 243-251.
26. Campbell, S. J.; Gold, N. D.; Jackson, R. M.; Westhead, D. R. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003, 13, 389-395.
27. Laurie, A. T.; Jackson, R. M. Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2006, 7, 395-406.
28. Yang, Z. R.; Wang, L.; Young, N.; Trudgian, D.; Chou, K. C. Pattern recognition methods for protein functional site prediction. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2005, 6, 479-491.
29. Laurie, A. T.; Jackson, R. M. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 1908-1916.
30. An, J.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2005, 4, 752-761.
31. Roche, O.; Kiyama, R.; Brooks, C. L., III. Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3592-3598.
32. Ewing, T. J.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
33. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242.
34. Brooks, B. R.; Bruccoleri, R. E.; Olafson, B. D.; States, D. J.; Swaminathan, S.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 187-217.
35. MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Bashford, D.; Bellott, M.; Dunbrack, R. L.; Evanseck, J. D.; Field, M. J.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Guo, H.; Ha, S.; Joseph-McCarthy, D.; Kuchnir, L.; Kuczera, K.; Lau, F. T. K.; Mattos, C.; Michnick, S.; Ngo, T.; Nguyen, D. T.; Prodhom, B.; Reiher, W. E.; Roux, B.; Schlenkrich, M.; Smith, J. C.; Stote, R.; Straub, J.; Watanabe, M.; Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J.; Yin, D.; Karplus, M. Allatom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3586-3616.
36. MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1584-1604.
37. Ferrin, T. E.; Huang, C. C.; Jarvis, L. E.; Langridge, R. The MIDAS display system. J. Mol. Graphics 1988, 6, 13-27.
38. Pettersen, E. F.; Goddard, T. D.; Huang, C. C.; Couch, G. S.; Greenblatt, D. M.; Meng, E. C.; Ferrin, T. E. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605-1612.
39. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
40. Carpenter, G. A.; Grossberg, S. Self-organization of stable category recognition codes for analog input patterns. Appl. Optics 1987, 26, 4919-4930.
41. Pao, Y.-H. Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks; Addison-Wesley: New York, 1989; Vol. 61.
42. Karpen, M. E.; Tobias, D. J.; Brooks, C. L., III, Statistical clustering techniques for the analysis of long molecular dynamics trajectories: analysis of 2.2-ns trajectories of YPGDV. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 412-420.
43. Hetenyi, C.; van der Spoel, D. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 1729-1737.
44. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halhday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
45. Laskowski, R. A.; Luscombe, N. M.; Swindells, M. B.; Thornton, J. M. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci. 1996, 5, 2438-2452.
46. Huang, N.; Nagarsekar, A.; Xia, G.; Hayashi, J.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Identification of non-phosphate-containing small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase p56 Lck SH2 domain via in silico screening against the pY + 3 binding site. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3502-3511.
47. Hancock, C. N.; Macias, A.; MacKerell, J. A. D.; Shapiro, P. Mitogen Activated Protein (MAP) Kinases: Development of ATP and Non-ATP Dependent Inhibitors. Med. Chem. 2006, 2, 213-222.
48. Markowitz, J.; Chen, I.; Gitti, R.; Baldisseri, D. M.; Pan, Y.; Udan, R.; Carrier, F.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.; Weber, D. J. Identification and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the calcium-dependent S100B-p53 tumor suppressor interaction. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5085-5093.
49. Pan, Y.; Huang, N.; Cho, S.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 267-272.
50. SiTSIX, version 7.3; Tripos, Inc.: St. Louis, MO, 2006.
51. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), version 20Q7.05; Chemical Computing Group Inc.: Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2007.
52. Chambers, C. C.; Hawkins, G. D.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Model for aqueous solvation based on class IV atomic charges and first solvation shell effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16385-16398.
53. Li, J.; Zhu, T.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. New class IV charges model for extracting accurate partial charges from wave functions. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1820-1831.
54. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
55. Oprea, T. I.; Davis, A. M.; Teague, S. J.; Leeson, P. D. Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A historical perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308-1315.
56. Tanimoto, T. IBM Internal Report 1957, Nov.
57. Godden, J. W.; Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Combinatorial preferences affect molecular similarity/diversity calculations using binary fingerprints and Tanimoto coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 163-166.
58. Durant, J. L.; Leland, B. A.; Henry, D. R.; Nourse, J. G. Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1273-1280.
59. Alex MacKerell. http://www.pharmacy.umaryland.edu/faculty/amackere/ (accessed July 24, 2007).
60. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38; 27-38.
61. Chen, I. J.; Neamati, N.; Nicklaus, M. C.; Orr, A.; Anderson, L.; Barchi, J. J.; Kelley, J. A.; Pommier, Y.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr.Identification of HIV-I integrase inhibitors via three-dimensional database searching using ASV and HIV-1 integrases as targets. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 2385-2398.
62. Sperl, S.; Jacob, U.; Arroyo de Prada, N.; Sturzebecher, J.; Wilhelm, O. G.; Bode, W.; Magdolen, V.; Huber, R.; Moroder, L. (4-aminomethyl) phenylguanidine derivatives as nonpeptidic highly selective inhibitors of human urokinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 5113-5118.
63. Ferrara, P.; Gohlke, H.; Price, D. J.; Klebe, G.; Brooks, C. L., III. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3032-3047.