Personality and technology acceptance: Personal innovativeness in IT, openness and resistance to change

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Nov, Oded ^a   Ye, Chen ^b  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS; PERSONALITY TRAITS;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 51449088878     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.348     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. "A Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology," Information Systems Research (9:2), 1998, pp. 204-215.
2. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. "Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?" Decision Sciences (30:2), 1999, pp. 361-391.
3. Ajzen, I. "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), 1991, pp. 179-211.
4. Anthony, L. M. Clarke, M. C. and Anderson, S. J. (2000). "Technophobia and personality subtypes in a sample of South African university students" Computers in Human Behavior, (16:1), 31, 2000, pp.31-44.
5. Ashkanasy, N., Bowen, P., Rohde, F., Wu, C. and Yueh, A. "The Effects of User Characteristics on Query Performance in the Presence of Information Request Ambiguity," Journal of Information Systems, (21:1), 2007 pp.53-82.
6. Benter, P. M. and Chou, C. P. "Practical Issues in Structural Modeling," Sociological Methods and Research, 16(1), 1987, pp. 78-117.
7. Chin, W. "The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling," in Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1998.
8. Colquitt, J. Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D. LePine, J. and Sheppard, L. "Computer-Assisted Communication and Team Decision-Making Performance: The Moderating Effect of Openness to Experience". Journal of Applied Psychology, (87:2), April 2002, pp. 402-410
9. Cooper, R. and Zmud, R. "Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach," Management Science (36:2), 1990, pp. 123-139.
10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Davis, F. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-340.
12. Davis, F.D. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts," International Journal of Man Machine Studies (38:3), September 1993, pp 475-487.
13. Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. "Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?" Management Science (49:3), March 2003, pp 273-289.
14. Devito Da Cunha, A and Greathead, D. "Does personality matter? an analysis of code-review ability," Communications of the ACM (50:5), 2007, pp. 109-112.
15. Digman, J. "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model," Annual Review of Psychology (41), 1990, pp. 417-440.
16. Eunjung Cha, A. "Employers Relying On Personality Tests To Screen Applicants," The Washington Post: A01.
17. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
18. Fornell, C. and Larker, D. "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research (18), 1981, pp. 39-50.
19. Gallivan, M. "Examining IT Professionals' Adaptation to Technological Change: The Influence of Gender and Personal Attributes," Database for Advances in Information Systems (35:3), 2004 pp.28-49.
20. Hong, K. and Kim, Y. "The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective," Information & Management (40:1), 2002, pp. 25-40.
21. Hong, W., Wong, W., Thong, J., and Tam, K. "Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics," Journal of Management Information Systems (18:3), 2002, pp. 97-124.
22. Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., and Cooed, C. D. "Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness," Human Communication Research (4) 1977, pp. 58-65.
23. Ilies, R., Scott, B., and Judge, T. "The Interactive Effects of Personal Traits and Experienced States on Intraindividual Patterns of Citizenship Behavior," Academy of Management Journal (49:3), 2006, pp. 561-575.
24. Jiang, J., Muhanna, W., and Klein, G. "User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types," Information & Management (37:1), 2000, pp. 25-36.
25. John, O. P., and Srivastava, S. The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, edited by L. A. Pervin and O. P. John. New York: Guilford Press, (1999): pp.102-138.
26. Jones, M., Reynolds, K., Weun, S., and Beatty, S. "The product-specific nature of impulse buying tendency," Journal of Business Research (56:7), 2003, pp. 505-511.
27. Karahanna, E. Ahuja, M., Srite, M., and Galvin, J. 2002 "Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS," Decision Support Systems, 32 4, 2002, pp.327-341
28. Klein, K. Beng-Chong, L. Saltz, J. and Mayer, D. "How do they get there? an examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks," Academy of Management Journal, (47:6), 2004 pp. 952-963
29. Korukonda, A. "Differences that do matter: A dialectic analysis of individual characteristics and personality dimensions contributing to computer anxiety," Computers in Human Behavior, (23:4), 2007, 1921-1942.
30. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., and Larsen, K.R.T. "The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (12:50), December 2003, pp 752-780.
31. Leonard-Barton, D. and Deschamps, I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology, Management Science (34:10), 1988 pp. 1252-1265.
32. Li, Y. Tan, C; Hock-Hai, T; Tan, B.C.Y. "Innovative Usage of Information Technology in Singapore Organizations: Do CIO Characteristics Make a Difference?" IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (53:2), 2006, pp. 177-190.
33. Manzoni, J. and Angehrn, A. "Understanding organization dynamics of IT-enabled change: A multimedia simulation approach," Journal of Management Information Systems (14:3), Winter 1997/1998, pp. 109-141.
34. Moldovan, S. and Goldenberg, J. "Cellular automata modeling of resistance to innovations: Effects and solutions." Technological Forecasting & Social Change (71), 2004, pp. 425-442.
35. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research (2:3), September 1991, pp. 192-222.
36. Mischel. W. "Toward an Integrative Science of the Person," Annual Review of Psychology (55), 2004, pp. 1-22.
37. Oreg, S. "Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure," Journal of Applied Psychology (88:4), 2003, pp. 587-604.
38. Oreg, S., Goldenberg, J., and Frankel, R. "Dispositional resistance to the adoption of innovations". Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey, 2005.
39. Oreg, S. "Personality, Context and Resistance to Organizational Change," European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (15:1), 2006, pp. 73-101.
40. Pratt, R. and Chudoba, K. "Is Extraversion the Next Predictor of System Adoption? Effects of Personality Traits on System Acceptance", in Proceedings of the Academy of Management Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2006.
41. Pulford, B and Sohal, H. "The influence of personality on HE students' confidence in their academic abilities," Personality and Individual Differences (41:8), 2006, pp. 1409-1419
42. Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York, 1995.
43. Rosenthal, S. and Pittinsky, T. "Narcissistic leadership," The Leadership Quarterly (17:6), 2006, pp. 617-633.
44. Schneider, R., Hough, L., and Dunnette, M. "Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less," Journal of Organizational Behavior (17:6), 1996, pp. 639-655.
45. Smither, R.D. The Psychology of Work and Human Performance, 3rd Edition. Longman, New York, 1998..
46. Srite, M. and Karahanna, E. "National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance," MIS Quarterly (30:3), 2006, pp. 679-704
47. Straub, D., Boudreau, M., and Gefen, D. "Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research," Communications of the AIS (13), 2004, pp. 380-427.
48. Thatcher, J. and Perrewé, P. "An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy," MIS Quarterly (26:4), 2002, pp. 381-399.
49. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G and Ackerman, P. L. "A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (83,1), 2000, pp.33-60.
50. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F. "User Acceptance of Information Technology - Toward A Unified View," MIS Quarterly (27:3), 2003, pp. 425-478.
51. Venkatramen, P. "The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption," Journal of Retailing {67.1) 1991, pp. 51-67.
52. Zweig, D. and Webster, J. "Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance," Computers in Human Behavior (19:4), 2003, pp. 479-493.