Toward an integrative science of the person

Annual Review of Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-22

  Mischel, Walter ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Personality; Personality dynamics; Personality paradox; Personality processes; Personality signatures; Role of situation; Social cognitive theory

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CONTROL;

HUMANS; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL;

EID: 1842590403     PISSN: 00664308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Allport GW. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
2. Allport GW. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
3. Andersen SM, Chen S. 2002. The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychol. Rev. 109:619-45
4. Anderson JR, Lebiere C. 1998. The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
5. Ayduk O, Downey G, Testa A, Yen Y, Shoda Y. 1999. Does rejection sensitivity elicit hostility in rejection-sensitive women? Soc. Cogn. 17:245-71
6. Ayduk O, Mendoza-Denton R, Mischel W, Downey G, Peake PK, Rodriguez M. 2000. Regulating the interpersonal self: strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 79:776-92
7. Ayduk O, Mischel W, Downey G. 2002. Attentional mechanisms linking rejection to hostile reactivity: the role of "hot" vs. "cool" focus. Psychol. Sci. 13:443-48
8. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, eds. 2004. Handbook of Self-Regulation Research. New York: Guilford
9. Bem DJ. 1983. Constructing a theory of triple typology: some (second) thoughts on nomothetic and idiographic approaches to personality. J. Personal. 51:566-77
10. Cantor N, Kihlstrom JE 1987. Personality and Social Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum
11. Cantor N, Mischel W, Schwartz J. 1982. A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cogn. Psychol. 14:45-77
12. Cervone D. 2003. The architecture of personality. Psychol. Rev. In press
13. Cervone D, Mischel W. 2002. Personality science. In Advances in Personality Science, ed. D Cervone, W Mischel, pp. 1-26. New York: Guilford
14. Cervone D, Shoda Y. 1999. Social cognitive theories and the coherence of personality. In The Coherence of Personality: Social-Cognitive Bases of Consistency, Variability, and Organization, ed. D Cervone, Y Shoda, pp. 155-81. New York: Guilford
15. Chen S. 2003. Psychological state theories about significant others: Implications for the content and structure of significant-other representations. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. In press
16. Chen-Idson L, Mischel W. 2001. The personality of familiar and significant people: the lay perceiver as a social cognitive theorist. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 80:585-96
17. Cheng C. 2001. Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: a multi-method approach. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 80:814-33
18. Cheng C. 2003. Cognitive and motivational processes underlying coping flexibility: a dual-process model. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 84:425-38
19. Chiu C, Hong Y, Mischel W, Shoda Y. 1995. Discriminative facility in social competence: conditional versus dispositional encoding and monitoring-blunting of information. Soc. Cogn. 13:49-70
20. Cronbach LJ. 1957. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am. Psychol. 12:671-84
21. Derryberry D. 2002. Attention and voluntary self-control. Self Identity 1:105-11
22. Downey G, Feldman S, Ayduk O. 2000. Rejection sensitivity and male violence in romantic relationships. Pers. Relat. 7:45-61
23. Epstein S. 1979. The stability of behavior: I. on predicting most of the people much of the time. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37:1097-126
24. Epstein S. 1980. The stability of behavior: II. implications for psychological research. Am. Psychol. 35:790-806
25. Feldman SI, Downey G. 1994. Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the impact of childhood exposure to family violence on adult attachment behavior. Dev. Psychopathol. 6:231-47
26. Fleeson W. 2001. Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distribution of states. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 80:1011-27
27. Hartshorne H, May A. 1928. Studies in the Nature of Character: Studies in Deceit. New York: Macmillan
28. Higgins ET. 1990. Personality, social psychology, and person-situation relations: standards and knowledge activation as a common language. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, ed. LA Pervin, pp. 301-38. New York: Guilford
29. Higgins ET. 1996. Ideals, oughts, & regulatory focus: affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. In The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior, ed. PM Gollwitzer, JA Bargh, pp. 91-114. New York: Guilford
30. Kagan J. 2003. Biology, context, and developmental inquiry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:1-23
31. Kashima Y, Kerekes ARZ. 1994. A distributed memory model of averaging phenomena in personal impression formation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30:407-55
32. Kelley HH, Holmes JG, Kerr NL, Reis HT, Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM. 2003. An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
33. Kelly GA. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton
34. Krahe B. 1990. Situation Cognition and Coherence in Personality: An Individual-Centered Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
35. Kunda Z. 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
36. Kunda Z, Thagard P. 1996. Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: a parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychol. Rev. 103:284-308
37. LeDoux J. 1996. The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon & Schuster
38. LeeTiernan S. 2002. Modeling and predicting stable response variation across situations. Unpublished doc. diss. thesis. Univ. Wash., Seattle
39. Lewin K. 1946. Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In Manual of Child Psychology, ed. L Carmichael, pp. 791-802. New York: Wiley
40. Magnusson D. 2000, The individual as the organizing principle in psychological inquiry. In Developmental Sciences and the Holistic Approach, ed. LR Bergman, RB Cairns, LG Nilsson, L Nystedt, pp. 33-47. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
41. Magnusson D, Endler NS. 1977. Interactional psychology: present status and future prospects. In Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology, ed. D Magnusson, NS Endler, pp. 3-31. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
42. Mendoza-Denton R, Ayduk O, Mischel W, Shoda Y, Testa A. 2001. Person situation interactionism in self-encoding (I am ... when ...): implications for affect regulation and social information processing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 80:533-44
43. Mendoza-Denton R, Downey G, Purdie VJ, Davis A, Pietrzak J. 2002. Sensitivity to status-based rejection: implications for African-American students' college experience. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83:896-918
44. Metcalfe J, Mischel W. 1999. A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychol. Rev. 106:3-19
45. Miller GA. 1999. On knowing a word. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50:1-19
46. Mischel W. 1968. Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley
47. Mischel W. 1973. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychol. Rev. 80:252-83
48. Mischel W, Morf CC. 2003. The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: a meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology. In Handbook of Self and Identity, ed. M Leary, J Tangney, pp. 15-43. New York: Guilford
49. Mischel W, Peake PK. 1982. In search of consistency: measure for measure. In Consistency in Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium, ed. MP Zanna, ET Higgins, CP Herman, pp. 187-207. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
50. Mischel W, Shoda Y. 1995. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychol. Rev. 102:246-68
51. Mischel W, Shoda Y. 1998. Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:229-58
52. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Mendoza-Denton R. 2002. Situation-behavior profiles as a locus of consistency in personality. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11:50-54
53. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M.1989. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933-38
54. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Smith RE. 2004. Introduction to Personality: Toward an Integration. New York: Wiley
55. Morf CC, Rhodewalt F. 2001. Expanding the dynamic self-regulatory processing model of narcissism: research directions for the future. Psychol. Inq. 12:243-51
56. Moskowitz DS. 1982. Coherence and cross-situational generality in personality: a new analysis of old problems. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 43:754-68
57. Moskowitz DS. 1994. Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 66:921-33
58. Newcombe TM. 1929. Consistency of Certain Extrovert-Introvert Behavior Patterns in 51 Problem Boys. New York: Columbia Univ., Teachers College, Bur. Publ.
59. Nisbett RE, Ross LD. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
60. Ochsner KM, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JD. 2002. Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14:1215-29
61. Pervin LA. 1994. A critical analysis of trait theory. Psychol. Inq. 5:103-13
62. Peterson DR. 1968. The Clinical Study of Social Behavior. New York: Appleton
63. Plaks JE, Shafer JL, Shoda Y. 2003. Perceiving individuals and groups as coherent: How do perceivers make sense of variable behavior? Soc. Cogn. In press
64. Posner MI, Rothbart MK. 2000. Developing mechanisms of self-regulation. Dev. Psychopathol. 12:427-41
65. Read SJ, Miller LC. 1998. On the dynamic construction of meaning: an interactive activation and competition model of social perception. In Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior, ed. S J Read, LC Miller, pp. 27-68. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
66. Ross L, Nisbett RE. 1991. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill
67. Sethi A, Mischel W, Aber L, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M. 2000. The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: predicting preschoolers' delay of gratification from mother-toddler interactions. Dev. Psychol. 36:767-77
68. Shoda Y. 2003. Individual differences in social psychology: Understanding situations to understand people, understanding people to understand situations. In Handbook of Methods in Psychology, ed. C Sansone, C Morf, A Panter. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. In press
69. Shoda Y, LeeTiernan SJ. 2002. What remains invariant? Finding order within a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors across situations. See Cervone & Mischel 2002, pp. 241-70
70. Shoda Y, LeeTiernan SJ, Mischel W. 2002. Personality as a dynamical system: emergence of stability and consistency in intra- and interpersonal interactions. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6:316-25
71. Shoda Y, Mischel W. 1998. Personality as a stable cognitive-affective activation network: characteristic patterns of behavior variation emerge from a stable personality structure. See Read & Miller 1998, pp. 175-208
72. Shoda Y, Mischel W. 2000. Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. Eur. J. Personal. 14:407-28
73. Shoda Y, Mischel W, Wright JC. 1989. Intuitive interactionism in person perception: effects of situation-behavior relations on dispositional judgments. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 56:41-53
74. Shoda Y, Mischel W, Wright JC. 1993a. Links between personality judgments and contextualized behavior patterns: situation-behavior profiles of personality prototypes. Soc. Cogn. 4:399-429
75. Shoda Y, Mischel W, Wright JC. 1993b. The role of situational demands and cognitive competencies in behavior organization and personality coherence. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 65:1023-35
76. Shoda Y, Mischel W, Wright JC. 1994. Intra individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: incorporating psychological situations into the ideographic analysis of personality. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 67:674-87
77. Shweder RA. 1999. Humans really are different. Science 283:798-99
78. Smith ER, DeCoster J. 1998. Person perception and stereotyping: simulation using distributed representations in a recurrent connectionist network. See Read & Miller 1998, pp. 111-40
79. Trope Y. 1986. Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychol. Rev. 93:239-57
80. Vansteelandt K, Van Mechelen I. 1998. Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: a triple typology model. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 75:751-65
81. Vernon PE. 1964. Personality Assessment: A Critical Survey. New York: Wiley
82. Vonk R. 1998. The slime effect: suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 74:849-64
83. Wright JC, Mischel W. 1987. A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 53:1159-77
84. Wright JC, Mischel W. 1988. Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 55:454-69
85. Zayas V, Shoda Y, Ayduk O. 2002. Personality in context: an interpersonal systems perspective. J. Personal. 70:851-98