Chapter 1 Using Robots to Understand Animal Behavior

Advances in the Study of Behavior

Volumn 38, Issue , 2008, Pages 1-58

  Webb, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 48849101836     PISSN: 00653454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)00001-6     Document Type: Review

References (284)

1. Arbas E.A., Willis M.A., and Kanzaki R. Organization of goal-oriented locomotion: Pheromone-modulated flight behavior of moths. In: Beer R., Ritzmann R., and McKenna I. (Eds). Biological Neural Networks in Invertebrate Neuroethology and Robotics (1993), Academic, New York 159-198
2. Arbib M.A. Rana computatrix: An evolving model of visuo-motor coordination in frog and toad. In: Hayes J.E., Michie D., and Pao Y.H. (Eds). Machine Intelligence Vol. 10 (1982), Ellis Horwood, New York 501-517
3. Arbib M.A. Levels of modeling of visually guided behavior. Behav. Brain Sci. 10 (1987) 407-465
4. Arbib M.A., and Liaw J. Sensorimotor transformations in the worlds of frogs and robots. Artif. Intell. 72 (1995) 53-79
5. Argyrakis P., Cheung R., Hamilton A., Zhang Y., Webb B., and Gonos T. Fabrication and characterization of a biomorphic wind sensor for integration with a neuron circuit. Microelectronic Eng. 84 (2007) 1749-1753
6. Atkins G., Ligman S., Burghardt F., and Stout F.J. Changes in phonotaxis by the female cricket Acheta domesticus L. after killing identified acoustic interneurons. J. Comp. Physiol. A 754 (1984) 795-804
7. Atkins G., Atkins S., Schoun D., and Stout J.F. Scototaxis and shape discrimination in the female cricket Acheta domesticus in an arena and on a compensatory treadmill. Physiol. Entomol. 12 (1987) 125-133
8. Autrum H. Über Lautäusserungen und Schallwahrnehmung bei Arthropoden. II. Das Richtungshören von Locusta und Versuch einer Hörtheorie für Tympanalorgane vom Locustidentyp. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 28 (1941) 326-352
9. Ayers J., and Witting J. Biomimetic approaches to the control of underwater walking machines. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 365 (2007) 273-295
10. Ayers J., Davis J.L., and Rudolph R. Neurotechnology for Biomimetic Robots (2002), Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA
11. Baba Y., Hirota K., and Yamaguchi T. Morphology and response properties of wind-sensitive non-giant interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of crickets. Zool. Sci. 8 (1991) 437-445
12. Baba Y., Hirota K., Shimozawa T., and Yamaguchi T. Differing afferent connections of spiking and nonspiking wind-sensitive local interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 176 (1995) 17-30
13. Bacon J.P., and Murphey R.K. Receptive fields of cricket (Acheta domesticus) are determined by their dendritic structure. J. Physiol. 352 (1984) 601-613
14. Balch T., Dellaert F., Feldman A., Guillory A., Isbell C., Khan Z., Pratt S., Stein A., and Wilde H. How multirobot systems research will accelerate our understanding of social animal behavior. Proc. IEEE 94 (2006) 1445-1463
15. Bar-Cohen Y. Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies (2006), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
16. Beer R.D., Quinn R.D., Chiel H.J., and Ritzmann R.E. Biologically inspired approaches to robotics. Commun. ACM 40 (1997) 31-33
17. Bennett-Clark H.C. Songs and the physics of sound production. In: Huber F., Moore T.E., and Loher W. (Eds). Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology (1989), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 227-261
18. Berry R.P., Warrant E., and Stange G. Form vision in the insect dorsal ocelli: An anatomical and optical analysis of the Locust Ocelli. Vision Res. 47 (2007) 1382-1393
19. Beugnon G., and Campan R. Homing in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. J. Insect Behav. 2 (1989) 187-198
20. Blanchard M., Rind F.C., and Verschure P.F.M.J. Collision avoidance using a model of the locust LGMD neuron. Robot. Auton. Syst. 30 (2000) 17-38
21. Blauert J. Spatial Hearing. The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
22. Böhm H., Schildberger K., and Huber F. Visual and acoustic course control in the cricket Gryllus-bimaculatus. J. Exp. Biol. 159 (1991) 235-248
23. Borst A., and Haag J. Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188 (2002) 419-437
24. Boyd P., and Lewis B. Peripheral auditory directionality in the cricket (Gryllus campestris L., Teleogryllus oceanicus Le Guillou). J. Comp. Physiol. A 153 (1983) 523-532
25. Bozkurt A., Gilmour R., Stern D., and Lal A. MEMS based bio-electronic neuro-muscle interfaces for insect flight control. "Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems" Tucson Arizona, January 13-17 (2008)
26. Braitenberg V. Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
27. Brunner D., and Labhart T. Behavioural evidence for polarization vision in crickets. Physiol. Entomol. 12 (1987) 1-10
28. Bryson J. Mechanisms of action selection. Adapt. Behav. 15 (2007) 5-8
29. Burdohan J., and Comer C. Cellular organization of an antennal mechanosensory pathway in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 5830-5843
30. Camhi J.M., and Johnson E.N. High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: Antennal wall-following in the cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 202 (1999) 631-643
31. Cartwright B.A., and Collett T.S. Landmark learning in bees. J. Comp. Physiol. A 151 (1983) 521-543
32. Cassenaer S., and Laurent G. Hebbian STDP in mushroom bodies facilitates the synchronous flow of olfactory information in locusts. Nature 448 (2007) 709-713
33. Chahl J., Thakoor S., Bouffant N.L., Stange G., Srinivasan M.V., and Hine B. Bioinspired engineering of exploration systems: A horizon sensor/attitude reference system based on the dragonfly ocelli for Mars exploration applications. J. Robotic Syst. 20 (2003) 35-42
34. Chapman T.P. Morphological and Neural Modelling of the Orthopteran Escape Response (2001), University of Edinburgh Ph. D. Thesis
35. Chapman T.P., and Webb B. A model of antennal wall-following and escape in the cockroach. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192 (2006) 949-969
36. Chappell R.L., and DeVoe R.D. Action spectra and chromatic mechanisms of cells in the median ocelli of dragonflies. J. Gen. Physiol. 65 (1975) 399-419
37. Collett T. Angular tracking and the optomotor response: An analysis of visual reflex interaction in a hoverfly. J. Comp. Physiol. A 140 (1980) 145-158
38. Collett T.S., and Udin S.B. Frogs use retinal elevation as a cue to distance. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163 (1988) 677-683
39. Collett T.S., Dillmann E., Giger A., and Wehner R. Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants. J. Comp. Physiol. A 170 (1992) 435-442
40. Corbacho F., Nishikawa K.C., Weerasuriya A., Liaw J.-S., and Arbib M.A. Schema-based learning of adaptable and flexible prey-catching in anurans I. The basic architecture. Biol. Cybern. 93 (2005) 391-409
41. Cordeschi R. The Discovery of the Artificial (2002), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
42. Cowan N.J., Lee J., and Full R.J. Task level control of rapid wall following in the American cockroach. J. Exp. Biol. 209 (2006) 1617-1629
43. Cruse H. Coordination of leg movement in walking animals. In: Meyer J.A., and Wilson S. (Eds). Simulation of adaptive behavior: From Animals to Animats (1991), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 105-119.
44. Cruse H., Bartling C., Dean J., Kindermann T., Schmitz J., Schumm M., and Wagner H. Coordination in a six-legged walking system: Simple solutions to complex problems by exploiting physical properties. In: Maes P., Mataric M.J., Meyer J.A., Pollack, J., and Wilson S.W. (Eds). From Animals to Animats 4 (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 84-93
45. Cruse H., Dürr V., and Schmitz J. Insect walking is based on a decentralized architecture revealing a simple and robust controller. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365 (2007) 221-250
46. Dangles O., Ory N., Steinmann T., Christides J.-P., and Casas J. Spider's attack versus cricket's escape: Velocity modes determine success. Anim. Behav. 72 (2006) 603-610
47. DARPA. DARPA Grand Challenge 2005 (2004), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 3701 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203-1714
48. DARPA. DARPA Urban Challenge: Program Announcement and Application Process (2007), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, 3701 North Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 1714
49. Datteri E., and Tamburrini G. Biorobotic experiments for the discovery of biological mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 74 (2007) 409-430
50. Delcomyn F. Factors regulating insect walking. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 30 (1985) 239-256
51. Delcomyn F. Insect walking and robotics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49 (2004) 51-70
52. Doherty J.A. Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J. Comp. Physiol. A 156 (1985) 787-801
53. Dürr V., and Krause A. The stick insect antenna as a biological paragon for an actively moved tactile probe for obstacle detection. In: Berns K., and Dillmann R. (Eds). Climbing and Walking Robots-From Biology to Industrial Applications. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR 2001) (2001), Professional Engineering Publishing, Bury St. Edmunds, London 87-96
54. Dürr V., Krause A.F., Neitzel M., Lange O., and Reimann B. Bionic tactile sensor for near-range search, localisation and material classification. In: Berns K., and Luksch T. (Eds). Autonome Mobile Systeme 2007 (2007), Springer, Heidelberg 240-246
55. Edwards J.S., and Palka J. The cerci and abdominal giant fibres of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus. I. Anatomy and physiology of normal adults. Proc. R. Soc. B 185 (1974) 83-103
56. Egelhaaf M., Kern R., Krapp H.G., Kretzberg J., Kurtz R., and Warzecha A.-K. Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant visual motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci. 25 (2002) 96-102
57. Ellington C.P. The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: Applications to micro-air vehicles. J. Exp. Biol. 202 (1999) 3439-3448
58. Esch H., Huber F., and Wohlers D.W. Primary auditory interneurons in crickets: Physiology and central projections. J. Comp. Physiol. A 137 (1980) 27-38
59. Espenschied K.S., Quinn R.D., Chiel H.J., and Beer R.D. Biologically-based distributed control and local reflexes improve rough terrain locomotion in a hexapod robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 18 (1996) 59-64
60. Ezrachi E.A. Computational model of the cockroach escape behavior: Winners and losers in a population code. Biol. Cybern. 88 (2003) 33-45
61. Fahrbach S. Structure of the mushroom bodies of the insect brain. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51 (2006) 209-232
62. Faurier K., and Campan R. Do solitary bees Osmia cornuta Latr. and Osmia lignaria cresson use proximal visual cues to localize their nest. J. Insect Behav. 11 (2004) 649-669
63. Feree T., and Lockery S. Computational rules for chemotaxis in the nematode C. elegans. J. Comp. Neurosci. 6 (1999) 263-277
64. Fermi G., and Reichardt W. Optomotorische Reaktionen der Fliege Musca domestica. Kybernetik 2 (1963) 15-28
65. Ferrell C. A comparison of three insect-inspired locomotion controllers. Robot. Auton. Syst. 16 (1995) 135-159
66. Floreano D., Mitri S., Magnenat S., and Keller L. Evolutionary conditions for the emergence of communication in robots. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 514-519
67. Franceschini N., Pichon J.M., Blanes C., and Brady J.M. From insect vision to robot vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 337 (1992) 283-294
68. Franceschini N., Ruffier F., and Serres J. A bio-inspired flying robot sheds light on insect piloting abilities. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 329-335
69. Franz M.O., Schölkopf B., Mallot H.A., and Bülthoff H.H. Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching. Biol. Cybern. 79 (1998) 191-202
70. Franz M.O., Chahl J., and Krapp H.G. Insect-inspired estimation of egomotion. Neural Comput. 16 (2004) 2245-2260
71. Gabbiani F., Krapp H.G., and Laurent G. Computation of object approach by a wide-field, motion-sensitive neuron. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1122-1141
72. Gabbiani F., Krapp H.G., Koch C., and Laurent G. Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420 (2002) 320-324
73. Garber D. Descartes, mechanics, and the mechanical philosophy. Midwest Studies Philos. 26 (2002) 185-204
74. Gerber B., Tanimoto H., and Heisenberg M. An engram found? Evaluating the evidence from fruit flies. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 (2004) 737-744
75. Giurfa M. Cognitive neuroethology: Dissecting non-elemental learning in a honeybee. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (2003) 726-735
76. Gnatzy W. Digger wasp vs cricket: Neuroethology of a predator-prey interaction. In: Lindauer M. (Ed). Information Processing in Animals Vol. 10 (1996), Fisher-Verlag, Stuttgart 1-92
77. Gonos T., and Webb B. Using homeostatic neurons for sensor self-calibration. To appear in "Proceedings: Biological Approached for Engineering," Southhampton, March 17-19 (2008)
78. Goodman L.J. The role of certain optomotor reactions in regulating stability in the rolling plane during flight in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. J. Exp. Biol. 42 (1965) 385-407
79. Goodman L.J. Organisation and physiology of the insect dorsal ocellar system. In: Autrum H. (Ed). Handbook of Sensory Physiology Vol. VII/6C (1981), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
80. Götz K.G. The optomotor equilibrium of the Drosophila navigation system. J. Comp. Physiol. 99 (1975) 187-210
81. Graham D. Pattern and control of walking in insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 18 (1985) 31-140
82. Gras H., and Hörner M. Wind-evoked escape running of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. I. Behavioural analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 171 (1992) 189-214
83. Grasso F., Consi T., Mountain D., and Atema J. Behavior of purely chemotactic robot lobster reveals different odor plume patterns in the jet region and the patch field of a turbulent plume. Biol. Bull. 191 (1996) 312-313
84. Gurney K., Humphries M., Wood R., Prescott T.J., and Redgrave P. Testing computational hypotheses of brain systems function: A case study with the basal ganglia. Netw. Comp. Neural 15 (2004) 263-290
85. Halloy J., Sempo G., Caprari G., Rivault C., Asadpour M., Tâche F., Saïd I., Durier V., Canonge S., Amé J.M., Detrain C., Correll N., et al. Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices. Science 318 (2007) 1155-1158
86. Harrison R.R., and Koch C. A robust analog VLSI motion sensor. Auton. Robots 7 (1999) 211-224
87. Harrison R.R., and Koch C. A silicon implementation of the fly's optomotor control system. Neural Comp. 12 (2000) 2291-2304
88. Hedrick A.V. Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: An empirical study. Am. Nat. 132 (1988) 267-276
89. Hedwig B., and Poulet J.F.A. Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering. Nature 430 (2004) 781-785
90. Hedwig B., and Poulet J.F.A. Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system. J. Exp. Biol. 208 (2005) 915-927
91. Heinze S., and Homberg U. Maplike representation of celestial e-vector orientations in the brain of an insect. Science 315 (2007) 995-997
92. Heisenberg M. Central brain function in insects: Genetic studies on the mushroom bodies and central complex in Drosophila. In: Schildberger K., and Elsner N. (Eds). Neural Basis of Behavioural Adaptations (1994), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart 61-79
93. Higgins C.M. Sensory architectures for biologically-inspired autonomous robotics. Biol. Bull. 200 (2001) 235-242
94. Homberg U. Multisensory processing in the insect brain. In: Christensen T.A. (Ed). Methods in Insect Sensory Neuroscience (2005), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 3-26
95. Hong J., Tan X., Pinette B., Weiss R., and Riseman E.M. Image-based homing. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA (1991) 620-625
96. Horchler A., Reeve R., Webb B., and Quinn R. Robot phonotaxis in the wild: A biologically inspired approach to outdoor sound localization. Adv. Robotics 18 (2004) 801-816
97. Horn E., and Wehner R. The mechanism of visual pattern fixation in the walking fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. A 101 (1975) 39-56
98. Hörner M. Wind-evoked escape running of the cricket Gryllus Bimaculatus: II. Neurophysiological analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 171 (1992) 215-245
99. Horridge A. The spatial resolutions of the apposition compound eye and its neuro-sensory feature detectors: Observation versus theory. J. Insect Physiol. 51 (2005) 243-266
100. Horseman G., and Huber F. Sound localisation in crickets. I. Contralateral inhibition of an ascending auditory interneuron (AN1) in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 174 (1994) 389-398
101. Huber F., and Thorson J. Cricket auditory communication. Sci. Am. 253 (1985) 47-54
102. Huber F., Moore T.E., and Loher W. Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology (1989), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
103. Hull C.L. The Principles of Behaviour (1943), Appleton Century, New York
104. Imaizumi K., and Pollack G.S. Neural coding of sound frequency by cricket auditory receptors. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1508-1516
105. Jacobs G.A. Detection and analysis of air currents by crickets. BioScience 45 (1995) 776-785
106. Jacobs G.A., and Theunissen F.E. Extraction of sensory parameters from a neural map by primary sensory interneurons. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000) 2934-2943
107. Judge S.J., and Rind F.C. The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories. J. Exp. Biol. 200 (1997) 2209-2216
108. Kaneko M., Kanayma N., and Tsuji T. Active antenna for contact sensing. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 14 (1998) 278-291
109. Kanou M. Directionality of cricket giant interneurons to escape eliciting unidirectional air current. Zoo1. Sci. 13 (1996) 35-46
110. Kanou M., and Kondoh K. Compensation of escape direction in unilaterally cercus-ablated crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus, is associated with the distance walked during recovery period. Zool. Sci. 21 (2004) 933-939
111. Kanou M., Ohshima M., and Inoue J. The air-puff evoked escape behavior of the cricket Gryllus Bimaculatus and its compensational recovery after cercal ablations. Zool. Sci. 16 (1999) 71-79
112. Kanou M., Teshima N., and Nagami T. Rearing conditions required for behavioral compensation after unilateral cercal ablation in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool. Sci. 19 (2002) 403-409
113. Katsman I., and Rivlin E. The mantis head camera (why the praying mantis is so good at catching its prey). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing (2003) 612-617
114. Kern R., van Hateren J.H., Michaelis C., Lindemann J.P., and Egelhaaf M. Function of a fly motion-sensitive neuron matches eye movements during free flight. PLoS Biol. 3 6 (2005) e171
115. Kindermann T. Behavior and adaptability of a six-legged walking system with highly distributed control. Adapt. Behav. 9 (2001) 16-41
116. Kohstall-Schnell D., and Gras H. Activity of giant interneurones and other wind-sensitive elements of the terminal ganglion in the walking cricket. J. Exp. Biol. 193 (1994) 157-181
117. Kornbluh R., Full R.J., Meijer K., Pelrine R., and Shastri S.V. Engineering a muscle: An approach to artificial muscle based on field-activated electroactive polymers. In: Ayers J., Davis J.L., and Rudolph A. (Eds). Neurotechnology for Biomimetic Robots (2002), Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA 137-172
118. Kral K. Side-to-side head movements to obtain motion depth cues: A short review of research on the praying mantis. Behav. Processes 43 (1998) 71-77
119. Krapp H.G. Neuronal matched filters for optic flow processing in flying insects. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 44 (2000) 93-120
120. Krapp H.G., and Hengstenberg R. Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons. Nature 384 (1996) 463-466
121. Krijnen G.J.M., Dijkstra M., van Baar J.J., Shankar S.S., Kuipers W.J., de Boer R.J.H., Altpeter D., Lammerink T.S.J., and Wiegerink R. MEMS based hair flow-sensors as model systems for acoustic perception studies. Nanotechnology 17 (2006) S84-S89
122. K-Team. Koala User's Manual (Version 2.0) (2001), K-Team S. A, Lausanne, Switzerland
123. Kubow T.M., and Full R.J. The role of the mechanical system in control: A hypothesis of self-stabilization in hexapedal runners. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354 (1999) 849-861
124. Kuwana Y., Nagasawa S., Shimoyama I., and Kanzaki R. Synthesis of the pheromone-oriented behaviour of silkworm moths by a mobile robot with moth antennae as pheromone sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 14 (1999) 195-202
125. Labhart T. Polarization-opponent interneurons in the insect visual system. Nature 331 (1988) 435-437
126. Labhart T. How polarization-sensitive interneurones of crickets see the polarization pattern of the sky: A field study with an opto-electronic model neurone. J. Exp. Biol. 202 (1999) 757-770
127. Labhart T., and Meyer E. Detectors for polarized skylight in insects: A survey of ommatidial specializations in the dorsal rim area of the compound eye. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47 (1999) 368-379
128. Labhart T., Petzold J., and Helbling H. Spatial integration in polarization-sensitive interneurones of crickets: A survey of evidence, mechanisms and benefits. J. Exp. Biol. 204 (2001) 2423-2430
129. Lambrinos D., Maris M., Kobayashi H., Labhart T., Pfeifer R., and Wehner R. An autonomous agent navigating with a polarized light compass. Adapt. Behav. 6 (1997) 131-161
130. Lambrinos D., Möller R., Labhart T., Pfeifer R., and Wehner R. A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation. Robot. Auton. Syst. 30 (2000) 39-64
131. Land M.F., and Collett T.S. Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). A description and analysis. J. Comp. Physiol. 89 (1974) 331-357
132. Land M.F., and Collett T.S. A survey of active vision in invertebrates. In: Srinivasan M.V., and Venkatesh S. (Eds). From Living Eyes to Seeing Machines (1997), Oxford University Press, Oxford 16-36
133. Landolfa M.A., and Jacobs G.A. Direction sensitivity of the filiform hair population of the cricket cercal system. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177 (1995) 759-766
134. Larsen O.N., and Michelsen A. Biophysics of the ensiferan ear. III. The cricket ear as a four-input system. J. Comp. Physiol. 123 (1978) 219-227
135. Laughlin S.B., de Ruyter van Steveninck R.R., and Anderson J.C. The metabolic cost of neural information. Nat. Neurosci. 1 (1998) 36-41
136. Lee J., Sponberg S., Loh O., Lamperski A., Full R., and Cowan N. Templates and anchors for antenna-based wall following in cockroaches and robots. IEEE T. Robotic. Autom. (Special Issue on Bio-Robotics) 24 1 (2008) 130-143
137. Lehrer M., Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., and Horridge G.A. Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension. Nature 332 (1988) 356-357
138. Liu L., Wolf R., Ernst R., and Heisenberg M. Context generalisation in Drosophila visual learning requires the mushroom bodies. Nature 400 (1999) 753-756
139. Liu S.C., and Usseglio-Viretta A. Fly-like visuo-motor responses of a robot using aVLSI motion-sensitive chips. Biol. Cybern. 85 (2001) 449-457
140. Loeb J. Forced Movements, Tropisms and Animal Conduct (1918/1973), Dover, New York
141. Lund H.H., Webb B., and Hallam J. A robot attracted to the cricket species Gryllus Bimaculatus. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
142. Machamer P.K., Darden L., and Craver C.F. Thinking about mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 57 (2000) 1-25
143. Martin J., Ernst R., and Heisenberg M. Mushroom bodies suppress locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Learn. Memory 5 (1998) 179-191
144. Masaki S. Significance of ovipositor length in life cycle adaptations of crickets. In: Taylor F., and Karbin R. (Eds). Insect Life Cycles (1986), Springer, Berlin 20-34
145. Mason A.C., and Faure P.A. The physiology of insect auditory afferents. Microsc. Res. Tech. 63 (2004) 338-350
146. Matsumoto S.G., and Hildebrand J.G. Olfactory mechanisms in the moth Manduca sexta: Response characteristics and morphology of central neurons in the antennal lobes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 213 (1981) 249-277
147. Mead C.A. Analog VLSI and Neural Systems (1989), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
148. Melhuish C., Welsby J., and Edwards C. Using templates for defensive wall building with autonomous mobile ant-like robots. Proceedings of TIMR99 Towards Intelligent Mobile Robots. Technical Report Series (1999), Department of Computer Science, Manchester University
149. Mendenhall B., and Murphey R.K. The morphology of cricket giant interneurons. J. Neurobiol. 5 (1974) 565-580
150. Menzel R. Searching for the memory trace in a mini-brain, the honeybee. Learn. Memory 8 (2001) 53-62
151. Meyer J.A., Guillot A., Girard B., Khamassi M., Pirim P., and Berthoz A. The Psikharpax project: Towards building an artificial rat. Robot. Auton. Syst. 50 (2005) 211-223
152. Michelsen A., and Löhe G. Tuned directionality in cricket ears. Nature 375 (1995) 639
153. Michelsen A., Popov A.V., and Lewis B. Physics of directional hearing in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175 (1994) 153-164
154. Miller J.P., and Jacobs G.A. Relationships between neuronal structure and function. J. Exp. Biol. 112 (1984) 129-145
155. Mizunami M., Okada R., Li Y., and Strausfeld N. Mushroom bodies of the cockroach: Activity and identities of neurons recorded in freely moving animals. J. Comp. Neurol. 402 (1998) 501-519
156. Mizunami M., Weibrecht J.M., and Strausfeld N.J. Mushroom bodies of the cockroach: Their participation in place memory. J. Comp. Neurol. 402 (1998) 520-537
157. Mobbs P. The brain and the honeybee Apis mellifera: I. The connections and spatial organization of the mushroom bodies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 298 (1982) 309-354
158. Möller R. Insect visual homing strategies in a robot with analog processing. Biol. Cybern. 83 (2000) 231-243
159. Mondada F., Franzi E., and Ienne P. In: Yoshikawa T., and Miyazaki F. (Eds). Mobile robot miniaturisation: A tool for investigation in control algorithms. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (1994), Springer Verlag, London
160. Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 11 (1984) 47-60
161. Murphey R.K., and Zaretsky M.D. Orientation to calling song by female crickets, Scasipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J. Exp. Biol. 56 (1972) 335-352
162. Nabatiyan A., Poulet J.F.A., de Polavieja G.G., and Hedwig B. Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system. J. Neurophysiol. 90 (2003) 2484-2493
163. Nishikawa M., Nishino H., Mizunami M., and Yokohari F. Function-specific distribution patterns of axon terminals of input neurons in the calyces of the mushroom body of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Neurosci. Lett. 245 (1998) 33-36
164. Niven J.E., Anderson J.C., and Laughlin S.B. Fly photoreceptors demonstrate energy-information trade-offs in neural coding. PLoS Biol. 5 (2007) e116
165. Nolen T.G., and Hoy R.R. Initiation of behavior by single neurons: The role of behavioral context. Science 226 (1984) 992-994
166. Nolfi S., and Floreano D. Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines. 2nd ed. (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
167. Nowotny T., Huerta R., Abarbanel H., and Rabinovich M. Self-organization in the olfactory system: One shot odor recognition in insects. Biol. Cybern. 93 (2005) 436-446
168. Okada R., Ikeda J., and Mizunami M. Sensory responses and movement-related activities in extrinsic neurons of the cockroach mushroom bodies. J. Comp. Physiol. A 185 (1999) 115-129
169. Oldfield B.P. Accuracy of orientation in female crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus (Gryllidae): Dependence on song spectrum. J. Comp. Physiol. A 141 (1980) 93-99
170. Oldfield B.P., Kleindienst H.U., and Huber F. Physiology and tonotopic organization of auditory receptors in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer. J. Comp. Physiol. A 159 (1986) 457-464
171. Olshausen B., and Field D. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14 (2004) 481-487
172. Parsons M.M., Krapp H.G., and Laughlin S.B. A motion-sensitive neurone responds to signals from the two visual systems of the blowfly, the compound eyes and ocelli. J. Exp. Biol. 209 (2006) 4464-4474
173. Paulson L.D. Biomimetic robots. Computer 37 (2004) 48-53
174. Paydar S., Doan C.A., and Jacobs G.A. Neural mapping of direction and frequency in the cricket cercal sensory system. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999) 1771-1781
175. Pfeifer R., Lungarella M., and Iida F. Self-organization, embodiment, and biologically inspired robotics. Science 318 (2007) 1088-1093
176. Pollack G.S. Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: The influence of sound direction on neural encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behaviour. J. Comp. Physiol. A 158 (1986) 549-561
177. Pollack G.S. Analysis of temporal patterns of communication signals. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11 (2001) 734-738
178. Pollack G.S., and Hoy R. Phonotaxis to individual components of a complex cricket calling song. J. Comp. Physiol. A 144 (1981) 367-373
179. Popov A.V., and Shuvalov V.F. Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J. Comp. Physiol. A 119 (1977) 111-126
180. Poulet J.F.A., and Hedwig B. Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (2005) 15665-15669
181. Poulet J.F.A., and Hedwig B. New insights into corollary discharges mediated by identified neural pathways. Trends Neurosci. 30 (2007) 14-21
182. Prescott T.J., Montes-Gonzalez F., Gurney K., Humphries M.D., and Redgrave P. A robot model of the basal ganglia: Behavior and intrinsic processing. Neural Netw. 19 (2006) 31-61
183. Prescott T.J., Bryson J.J., and Seth A.K. Introduction to special issue. Modelling natural action selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 362 (2007) 1521-1529
184. Pudas M., Viollet S., Ruffier F., Kruusing A., Amic S., Leppävuori S., and Franceschini N. A miniature bio-inspired optic flow sensor based on low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) technology. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 133 (2007) 88-95
185. Pyk P., Bermúdez i Badia S., Bernardet U., Knüsel P., Carlsson M., Gu J., Chanie E., Hansson B.S., Pearce T.C., and Verschure P.F.M.J. An artificial moth: Chemical source localization using a robot based neuronal model of moth optomotor anemotactic search. Auton. Robots 20 (2006) 197-213
186. Quinn R.D., Nelson G.M., Bachmann R.J., Kingsley D.A., Offi J., and Ritzmann R.E. Insect designs for improved robot mobility. In: Berns K., and Dillmann R. (Eds). Proceedings of Climbing and Walking Robots Conference (CLAWAR01) (2001), Professional Engineering Publications, Karlsruhe 69-76
187. Reeve R., and Webb B. New neural circuits for robot phonotaxis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361 (2002) 2245-2266
188. Reeve R., Webb B., Horchler A., Indiveri G., and Quinn R. New technologies for testing a model of cricket phonotaxis on an outdoor robot platform. Robot. Auton. Syst. 51 1 (2005) 41-54
189. Reichardt W. Optomotor reactions of the beetle Chlorophanus, housefly Musca and the fruitfly Drosophila. NRP Bull. 3 (1965) 48-54
190. Reiser M.B., and Dickinson M.H. A test bed for insect-inspired robotic control. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361 (2003) 2267-2285
191. Rind F.C., and Simmons P.J. Signalling of object approach by the DCMD neuron of the locust. J. Neurophysiol. 77 (1997) 1029-1033
192. Ritzmann R. The neural organization of cockroach escape and its role in context-dependent orientation. In: Beer R., Ritzmann R., and McKenna T. (Eds). Biological Neural Networks in Invertebrate Neuroethology and Robotics (1993), Academic, New York 113-137
193. Ritzmann R.E., Pollack A.J., Hudson S.E., and Hyvonen A. Convergence of multi-modal sensory signals at thoracic interneurons of the escape system of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Brain Res. 563 1-2 (1991) 175-183
194. Robert D. Visual steering under closed-loop conditions by flying locusts: Flexibility of optomotor response and mechanisms of correctional steering. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164 (1988) 15-24
195. Robert D., and Rowell C.H.F. Locust flight steering II. Acoustic avoidance maneuvers and associated head movements, compared with correctional steering. J. Comp. Physiol. A 171 (1992) 53-62
196. Rosano H., and Webb B. The control of turning in real and simulated stick insects. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4095 (2006) 150-161
197. Rosano H., and Webb B. A dynamic model of thoracic differentiation for the control of turning in the stick insect. Biol. Cybern. 97 (2007) 229-246
198. Ross T. Machines that think. A further statement. Psych. Rev. 42 (1935) 387-393
199. Russo P., Webb B., Reeve R., Arena P., and Patane L.A. Cricket-inspired neural network for feedforward compensation and multisensory integration. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (2005)
200. Sakura M., and Labhart T. Polarization-sensitive neurons in the central complex of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Neuroforum Suppl (2005) 154B
201. Sanes J.R., and Hildebrand J.G. Origin and morphogenesis of sensory neurons in an insect antenna. Dev. Biol. 51 (1976) 300-319
202. Saranli U., Buehler M., and Koditschek D.E. RHex: A simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. Int. J. Robotics Res. 20 (2001) 616-631
203. Sarpeshkar R. Analog versus digital: Extrapolating from electronics to neurobiology. Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 1601-1638
204. Sato H., Berry C.W., Casey B.E., Lavella G., Yao Y., and Maharbiz M.M. A Cyborg beetle: Insect flight control through an implantable, tetherless microsystem. "Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems" Tucson Arizona January 13-17 (2008)
205. Schildberger K. Temporal selectivity of identified auditory interneurons in the cricket brain. J. Comp. Physiol. A 155 (1984) 171-185
206. Schildberger K. Multimodal interneurons in the cricket brain: Properties of identified extrinsic mushroom body cells. J. Comp. Physiol. A 154 (1984) 71-79
207. Schildberger K., Milde J.J., and Horner M. The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis. I. Influence of hyperpolarization of identified neurons on sound localization. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163 (1988) 621-631
208. Schildberger K., Milde J.J., and Horner M. The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis II. Modulation of auditory responses during locomotion. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163 (1988) 633-640
209. Schildberger K., Huber F., and Wohlers D.W. Central auditory pathway: Neuronal correlates of phonotactic behavior. In: Huber F., Moore T.E., and Loher W. (Eds). Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology (1989), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 423-458
210. Schmitz B., Scharstein H., and Wendler G. Phonotaxis in Gryllus campestris L. I. Mechanism of acoustic orientation in intact female cricket. J. Comp. Physiol. A 148 (1982) 431-444
211. Schneider A., Cruse H., and Schmitz J. Decentralized control of elastic limbs in closed kinematic chains. Int. J. Robotics Res. 25 (2006) 913-930
212. Schuermann F.-W. Bemerkungen zur Funktion der Corpora pedunculata im Gehirn der Insekten aus morphologischer Sicht. Exp. Brain Res. 19 (1974) 406-432
213. Seelinger G., and Tobin T.R. Sense organs. In: Bell W.J., and Adiyodi K.G. (Eds). The American Cockroach (1981), Chapman & Hall, London 217-245
214. Shimozawa T., Murakami J., and Kumagai T. Cricket and wind receptors: Thermal noise for the highest sensitivity known. In: Barth F.G., Humphry J.A.C., and Secomb T.W. (Eds). Sensors and Sensing in Biology and Engineering (2003), Springer, Vienna
215. Smith L., Philippides A., Graham P., Baddeley B., and Husbands P. Linked local navigation for visual route guidance. Adapt. Behav. 15 (2007) 257-271
216. Spagna J.C., Goldman D.I., Lin P.-C., Koditschek D.E., and Full R.J. Distributed mechanical feedback in arthropods and robots simplifies control of rapid running on challenging terrain. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2 (2007) 9-18
217. Sponberg S., and Full R.J. Neuromechanical response of musculo-skeletal structures in cockroaches during rapid running on rough terrain. J. Exp. Biol. 211 (2008) 433-446
218. Srinivasan M.S., and Bernard G.D. The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response. J. Comp. Physiol. A 115 (1977) 101-117
219. Srinivasan M.V., and Zhang S.W. Visual control of honeybee flight. In: Lehrer M. (Ed). Orientation and Communication in Arthropods (1997), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel 95-113
220. Srinivasan M.V., Lehrer M., Kirchner W., and Zhang S.W. Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees. Vis. Neurosci. 6 (1991) 519-535
221. Srinivasan M.V., Chahl J.S., Weber K.S., Venkatesh S., Nagle M.G., and Zhang S.W. Robot navigation inspired by principles of insect vision. Robot. Auton. Syst. 26 (1999) 203-216
222. Stabel J., and Wendler G. Cricket phonotaxis: Localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern. J. Comp. Physiol. A 165 (1989) 165-177
223. Stange G. The ocellar component of flight equilibrium control in dragonflies. J. Comp. Physiol. 141 (1981) 335-347
224. Staudacher E.M. Sensory responses of descending brain neurons in the walking cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187 (2001) 1-17
225. Staudacher E.M., and Schildberger K. Gating of sensory responses of descending brain neurones during walking in crickets. J. Exp. Biol. 201 (1998) 559-572
226. Stout J.F., and McGhee R. Attractiveness of the male Acheta domestica calling song to females II. The relative importance of syllable period, intensity and chirp rate. J. Comp. Physiol. A 164 (1988) 277-287
227. Stout J.F., DeHaan C.H., and McGhee R. Attractiveness of the male Acheta domestica calling song to females. J. Comp. Physiol. A 153 (1983) 509-521
228. Strausfeld N., Hansen L., Li Y., Gomez R., and Ito K. Evolution, discovery, and interpretations of arthropod mushroom bodies. Learn. Memory 5 (1998) 11-37
229. Sutton R., and Barto A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
230. Szenher M. Visual Homing in Indoor Environments (2007), University of Edinburgh Ph.D. Thesis
231. Tammero L.F., and Dickinson M.H. Collision-avoidance and landing responses are mediated by separate pathways in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 205 (2002) 2785-2798
232. Tauber E., and Camhi J. The wind-evoked escape behavior of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus: Integration of behavioral elements. J. Exp. Biol. 198 (1995) 1895-1907
233. Taylor C.P. Contribution of compound eyes and ocelli to steering of locusts in flight. I. Behavioural analysis. J. Exp. Biol. 93 (1981) 1-18
234. Thakoor S., Morookian J.M., Chahl J., Hine B., and Zornetzer S. BEES: Exploring Mars with bioinspired technologies. Computer 37 (2004) 38-47
235. Thorson J., Weber T., and Huber F. Auditory behaviour of the cricket II simplicity of calling-song recognition in Gryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J. Comp. Physiol. A 146 (1982) 361-378
236. Tinbergen N. On aims and methods in ethology. Z. Tierpsychol. 20 (1963) 410-433
237. Tinbergen N., and Kruyt W. On the orientation of the digger wasp, Philanthus triangulum Fabr, III. Selective learning of landmarks. In: Tinbergen N. (Ed). The Animal and Its World (1938), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
238. Torben-Nielsen B., Webb B., and Reeve R. New ears for a robot cricket. Lec. Notes Comp. Sci. 3696 (2005) 297-304
239. van Hateren J.H., and Snippe H.P. Phototransduction in primate cones and blowfly photoreceptors: Different mechanisms, different algorithms, similar response. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192 (2006) 187-197
240. van Helversen D., and Wendler G. Coupling of visual to auditory cues during phonotactic approach in the phaneropterine bushcricket Poecilimon affinis. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186 (2000) 729-736
241. Vardy A., and Möller R. Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optical flow techniques. Connect. Sci. 17 (2005) 47-89
242. von Holst E., and Mittelstaedt H. Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften 37 (1950) 464-476
243. Wallace G.K. Visual perception and behaviour in the desert locust. Anim. Behav. 6 (1958) 242-243
244. Wallach H. The role of head movements and vestibular and visual cues in sound localization. J. Exp. Psychol. 27 (1940) 339-368
245. Walter W.G. An imitation of life. Sci. Am. 182 (1950) 42-45
246. Warzecha A.-K., and Egelhaaf M. Intrinsic properties of biological motion detectors prevent the optomotor control system from getting unstable. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351 (1996) 1579-1591
247. Watson J.T., Ritzmann R.E., Zill S.N., and Pollack A.J. Control of obstacle climbing in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis I. Kinematics. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 188 (2002) 39-53
248. Webb B. Using robots to model animals: A cricket test. Robot. Auton. Syst. 16 (1995) 117-134
249. Webb B. What does robotics offer animal behaviour?. Anim. Behav. 60 (2000) 545-558
250. Webb B. Can robots make good models of biological behaviour. Behav. Brain Sci. 24 (2001) 1033-1050
251. Webb B. Neural mechanisms for prediction: Do insects have forward models. Trends Neurosci. 27 (2004) 278-282
252. Webb B. Transformation, encoding and representation. Curr. Biol. 6 (2006) R184-R185
253. Webb B. Validating biorobotic models. J. Neural Eng. 3 (2006) R25-R35
254. Webb B., and Harrison R. Integrating sensorimotor systems in a robot model of cricket behaviour. In: McKee G.T., and Schenker P.S. (Eds). Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems III. Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)4196 (2000) 113-124
255. Webb B., and Reeve R. Reafferent or redundant: How should a robot cricket use an optomotor reflex. Adapt. Behav. 11 (2003) 137-158
256. Webb B., and Scutt T. A simple latency dependent spiking neuron model of cricket phonotaxis. Biol. Cybern. 82 (2000) 247-269
257. Webb B., Wessnitzer J., Bush S., Schul J., Buchli J., and Ijspeert A. Resonant neurons and bushcricket behaviour. J. Comp. Physiol. A 193 (2007) 285-288
258. Weber T. Phonotaxis and visual orientation in Gryllus campestris L: Behavioural experiments. In: Gribakin F.G., Wiese K., and Popov A.V. (Eds). Sensory Systems and Communication in Arthropods (1990), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel 377-386
259. Weber T., and Thorson J. Auditory behaviour in the cricket IV. Interaction of direction of tracking with perceived temporal pattern in split-song paradigms. J. Comp. Physiol. A 163 (1988) 13-22
260. Weber T., Thorson J., and Huber F. Auditory behaviour of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J. Comp. Physiol. A 141 (1981) 215-232
261. Weber K., Venkatesh S., and Srinivasan M. Insect-inspired robotic homing. Adapt. Behav. 7 (1999) 65-97
262. Wehner R. Matched filters-neural models of the external world. J. Comp. Physiol. A 161 (1987) 511-531
263. Wehner R. Arthropods. In: Papi F. (Ed). Animal Homing (1992), Chapman and Hall, London 45-144
264. Wehner R. The polarization-vision project: Championing organismic biology. In: Schildberger K., and Elsner N. (Eds). Neural Basis of Behavioural Adaptation (1994), Fischer, Stuttgart 103-143
265. Weidemann H.-J., Pfeiffer F., and Eltze J. The six-legged TUM walking robot. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems '94. Advanced Robotic Systems and the Real World (1994) 1026-1033
266. Weitzenfeld A. A multilevel approach to biomimetic robots: From schemas to neural networks. Tech. Rep. ITAM (2004)
267. Wendler G. Pattern recognition and localization in cricket phonotaxis. In: Gribakin F.G., Wiese K., and Popov A.V. (Eds). Sensory Systems and Communication in Arthropods (1990), Birkhauser Verlag, Basel 387-394
268. Wessnitzer J., and Webb B. Multimodal sensory integration in insects-Towards insect brain control architectures. Bioinspir. Biomim. 1 (2006) 63-75
269. Wessnitzer J., and Webb B. A neural model of cross-modal association in insects. In: Verleysen M. (Ed). Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (2007), D-side, Bruges 415-421
270. Wessnitzer J., Webb B., and Smith D. A model of non-elemental associative learning in the Mushroom body neuropil of the insect brain. Proceedings of the International Conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms (2007) LNCS 4431, 4432
271. Wessnitzer J., Mangan M., and Webb B. Place memory in crickets. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275 (2008) 915-921
272. Willis M.A., Belanger J., and Jouse W.C. Olfactory orientation in animals: Hypothesis testing with a mobile robot. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 28 (2002) 465.5
273. Wilson D. Insect walking. Annu. Rev. Entemol. 11 (1966) 103-122
274. Wilson M. The functional organization of locust ocelli. J. Comp. Physiol. 124 (1978) 297-316
275. Wohlers D.W., and Huber F. Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. J. Comp. Physiol. A 146 (1981) 161-173
276. Wörgötter F., and Porr B. Temporal sequence learning, prediction and control-A review of different models and their relation to biological mechanisms. Neural Comput. 17 (2005) 245-319
277. Yack J.E. The structure and function of auditory chordotonal organs in insects. Microsc. Res. Tech. 63 (2004) 315-337
278. Yakovleff A., Abbott D., Nguyen X.T., Eshraghian K., Cantoni V., Lombardi L., Mosconi M., Savini M., and Setti A. Obstacle avoidance and motion-induced navigation. Computer Architectures for Machine Perception (CAMP'95) (1995) 384
279. Ye S., and Comer C. Correspondance of escape-turning behavior with activity of decending mechanosensory interneurons in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J. Neurosci. 16 (1996) 5844-5853
280. Yue S., and Rind F.C.A. Collision detection in complex dynamic scenes using an LGMD-based visual neural network with feature enhancement. IEEE T. Neural Netw. 17 (2006) 705-716
281. Zampoglou M., Szenher M., and Webb B. Adaptation of controllers for image-based homing. Adapt. Behav. 14 (2006) 381-399
282. Zeil J., and Hemmi J.M. The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. J. Comp. Physiol. A 192 (2006) 1-25
283. Zeil J., Hoffmann M.I., and Chahl J.S. Catchment areas of panoramic images in outdoor scenes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20 (2003) 450-469
284. Zufferey J.-C., and Floreano D. Fly-inspired visual steering of an ultralight indoor aircraft. IEEE T. Robot. 22 (2006) 137-146