Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 2484-2493

  Nabatiyan, A ^a   Poulet, J F A ^a   De Polavieja, G G ^b   Hedwig, B ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c Dept of Zoology ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; COMPULSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRYLLUS BIMACULATUS; INSECT; MATING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOTAXIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND; SPIKE WAVE; STEREOTYPY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; NEURONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0142122291     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00259.2003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Atkins G, Ligman S, Burghardt F, and Stout JF. Changes in phonotaxis by the female cricket Acheta domesticus L. after killing identified acoustic interneurons. J Comp Physiol [A] 154: 795-804, 1984.
2. Atkins G and Pollack GS. Response properties of prothoracic interganglionic, sound-activated interneurons in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. J Comp Physiol [A] 161: 681-693, 1987.
3. Ball EE, Oldfield BP, and Michel-Rudolph K. Auditory organ structure, development, and function. In: Cricket Behaviour and Neurobiology, edited by Huber F, Moore TE, and Loher W. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1989, p. 391-422.
4. Cade WH. Effect of male deprivation on female phonotaxis in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae; Gryllus), Can Ent 111: 741-744, 1979.
5. Casaday GB and Hoy RR. Auditory interneurons in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: physiological and anatomical properties. J Comp Physiol [A] 121: 1-13, 1977.
6. Condon CJ, Chang S-H, and Feng AS. Processing of behaviourally relevant temporal parameters of acoustic stimuli by single neurons in the superior olivary nucleus of the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol [A] 168: 709-725, 1991.
7. Doherty JA. Temperature coupling and "trade-off" phenomena in the acoustic communication system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer (Gryllidae). J Exp Biol 114: 17-35, 1985a.
8. Doherty JA. Trade-off phenomenoa in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol [A] 156: 787-801, 1985b.
9. Doolan JM and Pollack GS. Phonotactic specificity of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus. J Comp Physiol [A] 157: 223-233, 1985.
10. Eggermont JJ. Temporal modulation transfer function in cat primary auditory cortex: separating stimulus effects from neural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 87: 305-321, 2001.
11. Esch H, Huber F, and Wohlers DW. Primary auditory neurons in crickets: physiology and central projections. J Comp Physiol [A] 137: 27-38, 1980.
12. Grothe B, Covey E, and Casseday JH. Medial superior olive of the big brown bat: neuronal responses to pure tones, amplitude modulations and pulse trains. J Neurophysiol 86: 2219-2230, 2001.
13. Grothe B, Park TJ, and Schuller G. Medial superior olive in the free tailed bat: response to pure tones and amplitude-modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 71: 1553-1565, 1997.
14. Hedwig B and Knepper M. NEUROLAB, a comprehensive program for the analysis of neurophysiological and behavioral data. J Neurosci Methods 45: 135-148, 1992.
15. Huber F. Neural correlates of orthopteran and cicada phonotaxis. In: Neuroethology and Behavioural Physiology, edited by Huber F and Markl H. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1983, p.108-135.
16. Janiszewski J and Otto D. Response and song pattern copying of Omega-type I-neurons in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, at different prothoracic temperatures. J Comp Physiol [A] 164: 443-450, 1989.
17. Koch C. Biophysics of Computation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1999.
18. Kohne R, Atkin S, Stout J, and Atkins G. Enhanced calling song syllable period discrimination during one-eared phonotaxis by the female cricket (Acheta domesticus) J Comp Physiol [A] 170: 357-362, 1992.
19. Kuwada S and Batra K. Coding of sound envelopes by inhibitory rebound in neurons of the superior olivary complex in the unaesthetized rabbit. J Neurosci 19: 2273-2287, 1999.
20. Langner G and Schreiner CE. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 60: 1799-1822, 1988.
21. Loher W, Weber T, and Huber F. The effect of mating on phonotactic behaviour in Gryllus bimaculatus (DeGeer). Physiol Entomol 18: 57-66, 1993.
22. Loher W, Weber T, Rembold H, and Huber F. Persistence of phonotaxis in females of four species of crickets following allatectomy. J Comp Physiol [A] 171: 325-341, 1992.
23. Machens CK, Schütze H, Franz A, Kolesnikova O, Stemmler MB, Ronacher B, and Herz AVM. Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals. Nature Neuroscience 6: 341-342, 2003.
24. Meyer J and Hedwig B. The influence of tracheal pressure changes on the responses of the tympanal membrane and auditory receptors in the locust Locusta migratoria L. J Exp Biol 198: 1327-1339, 1995.
25. Michelsen A. The tuned cricket. New Physiol Sci 13: 32-38, 1998.
26. Nocke H. Physiological aspects of sound communication in crickets (Gryllus campestris L.) J Comp Physiol [A] 80: 141-162, 1972.
27. Nolen TG and Hoy RR. Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioural context. Science 226: 992-994, 1984.
28. Penna M, Lin W-Y, and Feng AS. Temporal sensitivity for complex signals by single neurons in the toros semicircularis of Pleurodema thaul (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae). J Comp Physiol [A] 180: 313-328, 1997.
29. Pollack GS. Discrimination of calling song models by the cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus: the influence of sound direction on neural encoding of the stimulus temporal pattern and on phonotactic behaviour. J Comp Physiol [A] 158: 549-561, 1986.
30. Pollack GS. Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron. J Neurosci 8: 2635-2639, 1988.
31. Pollack GS. Neural processing of acoustic signals. In: Comparative Hearing: Insects, edited by Hoy RR, Popper AN, and Fay RR. New York; Springer, 1998, p. 139-196.
32. Pollack GS. Who, what, where? Recognition and localization of acoustic signals by insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 763-767, 2000.
33. Pollack GS. Analysis of temporal patterns of communication signals. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 734-738, 2001.
34. Pollack GS and Hoy RR. Temporal pattern as a cue for species-specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204: 429-432, 1979.
35. Popov AV and Markovich AM. Auditory interneurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. II. A high-frequency ascending neuron (HF1AN). J Comp Physiol [A] 146: 351-359, 1982.
36. Popov AV, Markovich AM, and Andjan AS. Auditory interneurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus deGeer. I. The large segmental auditory neuron (LSAN). J Comp Physiol [A] 126: 183-192, 1978.
37. Popov AV and Shuvalov VF. Phonotactic behaviour of crickets. J Comp Physiol [A] 119: 111-126, 1977.
38. Reich DS, Mechler F, Purpura KP, and Victor JD. Interspike intervals, receptive fields, and information encoding in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 20: 1964-1974, 2000.
39. Rheinlaender J, Kalmring K, Popov AV, and Rehbein H. Brain projections and information processing of biologically significant sounds by two large ventral-cord neurons of Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). J Comp Physiol [A] 110: 251-269, 1976.
40. Roeder KD. Aspects of the noctuid tympanic nerve response having significance in ther avoidance of bats. J Insect Physiol 10: 529-546, 1964.
41. Rose GJ and Capranica RR. Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system. J Neurophysiol 53: 446-465, 1985.
42. Schildberger K. Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain. J Comp Physiol [A] 155: 171-185, 1984.
43. Schildberger K. Recognition of temporal patterns by identified auditory neurons in the brain. In: Acoustic and Vibrational Communication in Insects, edited by Kalmring K and Elsner N. Berlin, Germany: Parey, 1985, p. 41-50.
44. Schildberger K and Hörner M. The function of auditory interneurons in cricket phonotaxis. I. Influence of hyperpolarisation of identified neurons on sound localization. J Comp Physiol [A] 163: 621-631, 1988.
45. Schildberger K, Huber F, and Wohlers DW. Central auditory pathway: neuronal correlates of phonotactic behavior. In: Cricket Behaviour and Neurobiology, edited by Huber F, Moore TE, and Loher W. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press, 1989, p. 423-458.
46. Schildberger K, Milde JJ, and Hörner M. The function of auditory interneurons in cricket phonotaxis. II. Modulation of auditory responses during locomotion. J Comp Physiol [A] 163: 633-640, 1988.
47. Selverston A, Kleindienst HU, and Huber F. Synaptic connectivity between cricket auditory interneurons as studies by selective photoablation. J Neurosci 5: 1283-1292, 1985.
48. Sergejeva MV and Popov AV. Ontogeny of positive phonotaxis in female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus de Geer: dynamics of sensitivity, frequency-intensity domain, and selectivity to temporal pattern of the male calling song. J Comp Physiol [A] 174: 381-389, 1994.
49. 2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neurone: an example of chemical computation. Science 263: 823-826, 1994.
50. Stabel J, Wendler G, and Scharstein H. Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern. J Comp Physiol [A] 165: 165-177, 1989.
51. Stout J, Atkins G, and Zacharias D. Regulation of cricket phonotaxis through hormonal control of th threshold of an identified auditory neuron. J Comp Physiol [A] 169: 765-772, 1991.
52. Stout JF, DeHaan CH, and McGhee RW. Attractiveness of the male Acheta domesticus calling song of females. I. Dependence on each of the calling song features. J Comp Physiol [A] 153: 509-521, 1983.
53. Stout J and McGhee R. Attractiveness of the male Acheta domestica calling song to females. II. The relative importance of syllable period, intensity, and chirp rate. J Comp Physiol [A] 164: 277-287, 1988.
54. Surlykke A, Larsen OL, and Michelsen A. Temporal coding in the auditory receptor of the moth ear. J Comp Physiol [A] 162: 367-374, 1988.
55. Thorson J, Weber T, and Huber F. Auditory behaviour of the cricket. II. Simplicity of the calling-song recognition in Gryllus, and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol [A] 146: 361-378, 1982.
56. Tschuch G. The influence of synthetic songs on female Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer (Part2). Zool Jb Physiol 81: 360-372, 1977.
57. Webb B and Scutt T. A simple latency-dependent spiking-neuron model of cricket phonotaxis. Biol Cybern 82: 247-269, 2000.
58. Weber T, Thorson J, and Huber F. Auditory behaviour of the cricket. I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol [A] 141: 215-232, 1981.
59. Wessel R, Koch K, and Gabbiani F. Coding of time-varying electric field amplitude modulation in a wave-type electric fish. J Neurophysiol 75: 2280-2293, 1996.
60. Wiese K and Eilts K. Evidence for matched frequency dependence of bilateral inhibition in the auditory pathway of Gryllus bimaculatus. Zool Jb Physiol 89: 181-201, 1985.
61. Wohlers D and Huber F. Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneuyrons (Gryllus campestris L, Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer). J Comp Physiol [A] 127: 11-28, 1978.
62. Wohlers D and Huber F. Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. J Comp Physiol [A] 146: 161-173, 1982.