No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 417-456

  Hopmann, Stefan Thomas ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Accountability; Curriculum; No Child Left Behind; PISA; School change; Standards based reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949087343     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220270801989818     Document Type: Article

References (193)

1. Abbott, A. (1988) University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1
2. Ahearn, E. M. (2000) National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Alexandria, VA
3. Aikin, W. M. (1942) Harper & Brothers, New York
4. Åakerstrøm Andersen, N. (2003) Hans Reitzels Forlag, Copenhagen
5. Aktionsrat Bildung (2007) Verlag Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany
6. Alexander, L., James, H. T. and Glaser, R. (1987) National Academy of Education, Stanford, CA
7. Allerup, P. (2005) PISA præstationer-målinger med skaelig;ve målestokke? [PISA performances-measurements with imprecise scales]. 53:1, pp. 68-81.
8. Allerup, P. (2006) Rockwool Fondens Forskningsenhed og Syddansk Universitets forlag, Odense, Denmark
9. Allerup, P. (2007) Identification of group differences using PISA scales: Considering effects of inhomogeneous items. pp. 175-203. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
10. (1994) Ad notam Gyldendal, Oslo
11. Amrein, A. L. and Berliner, D. C. (2002) High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. 10:18
12. Apple, M. W. (2007) Ideological success, educational failure? On the politics of No Child Left Behind. 58:2, pp. 108-116.
13. Bachmann, K. and Sivesind, K. (2008) Regn med meg! Evaluering og ansvarligjøring i skolen [Count on me! Assessment and accountability in school]. Cappelen, Oslo
14. Bachmann, K., Sivesind, K. and Hopmann, S. T. (2004) Høyskoleforlag, Kristiansand, Norway
15. (1998) Policy Press, Bristol, UK
16. (2006) Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, Germany
17. Beck, U. (2007) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
18. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (2007) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
19. Benner, D. (2002) Die Struktur der Allgemeinbildung im Kerncurriculum moderner Bildungssysteme: Ein Vorschlag zur bildungstheoretischen Rahmung von PISA. 48:1, pp. 68-90.
20. Benoit, W. L. (1995) State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
21. Berliner, D. C. (2005) Our impoverished view of educational reform. 106:6, pp. 949-995.
22. Birkeland, N. (2008) Ansvarlig, jeg? Accountability på norsk [What, am I accountable?]. Cappelen, Oslo
23. Birman, B., Le Floch, K. C., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, M., Taylor, J., Walters, K., Wayne, A., Yoon, K. -S., Vernez, G., Garet, M. and O'Day, J. (2007) Rand, Santa Monica, CA
24. Bishop, J. H. and Woessmann, L. (2004) Institutional effects in a simple model of educational production. 12:1, pp. 17-38.
25. (1956) David McKay, New York
26. Bodin, A. (2007) What does PISA really assess? What it does it not? A French view. pp. 21-56. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
27. (1996) Nova Science Publishers, Hauppage, NY
28. Bozkurt, D., Retzl, M. and Brinek, G. (2007) PISA in Osterreich: Mediale Reaktionen, offentliche Bewertungen und politische Konsequenzen. pp. 321-362. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
29. Bracey, G. W. (2005) Research: Put out over PISA. 86:10, p. 797.
30. Braun, H. (2004) Reconsidering the impact of high-stakes testing. 12:1
31. Breuer, S. (1991)Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany
32. Brockling, U., Krasmann, S. and Lemke, T. (2005) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
33. (1994) Paul Haupt, Bern
34. Cannell, J. J. (1988) Nationally normed elementary achievement testing in America's public schools: How all 50 states are above the national average. 7:1, pp. 5-9.
35. Caswell, H. L. (1929) Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
36. (2005) Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
37. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D. and York, R. L. (1966) US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, Washington, DC
38. Conant, J. B. (1959) McGraw-Hill, New York
39. Cook, T. D. (1997) Lessons learned in evaluation over the past 25 years. pp. 30-52. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
40. (2007) Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD
41. Dohn, N. B. (2007) Knowledge and skills for PISA: Assessing the assessment. 41:1, pp. 1-16.
42. Dolin, J. (2007) PISA: An example of the use and misuse of large-scale comparative tests. pp. 93-126. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
43. Dorn, S. (1998) The political legacy of school accountability systems. 6:1
44. Dubnick, M. J. (2005) Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. 28:3, pp. 376-417.
45. Eberts, R., Hollenbeck, L. and Stone, J. (2002) Teacher performance incentives and student outcomes. 37:4, pp. 913-927.
46. Education Commission of the States (ECS) (2002) Educational Commission of the States, Denver, CO
47. Elmore, R. F. (2004) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Elstad, E. (2008) Hvordan forholder skoler seg til ansvarliggjøring av skolens bidrag til elevenes læringsresultater? [What is the school's position regarding accountability towards their contribution to pupil' learning outcomes?]. Cappelen, Oslo
49. Elstad, E. and Langfeldt, G. (2008) Hvordan forholder skoler seg til målinger av kvalitetsaspekter ved lærernes undervisning og elevenes læringsprosesser? [What is the school's position regarding assessments of qualitative aspects of teachers' instruction and pupils' learning outcomes?]. Cappelen, Oslo
50. Engeland, Ø., Langfeldt, G. and Roald, K. (2008) Kommunalt handlingsrom: Hvordan møter norske kommuner ansvarsstyring i skolen? [Municipal freedom of movement: How do Norwegian municipalities deal with responsibility allocation in schools?]. Cappelen, Oslo
51. (1996) Sage, London
52. Fertig, M. (2004) Rheinisch-Westfalisches Institut fur Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen, Germany
53. Foucault, M. (2006) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
54. Fuchs, H. -W. (2003) Auf dem Wege zu einem neune Weltcurriculum? Zum Grundbildungskonzept von PISA und der Aufgabenzuweisung an die Schule. 49:2, pp. 161-179.
55. (2001) University of Chicago Press, Chicago
56. Fukuyama, F. (1992) Free Press, New York
57. Goodlad, J. I. (1983) McGraw-Hill, New York
58. Gorard, S. (2006) Value-added is little value. 21:2, pp. 235-243.
59. Gottweis, H., Hable, W., Prasack, B. and Wyndra, D. (2004) Bohlau, Vienna
60. (1990) Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London
61. Gundem, B. B. (1992) Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
62. Gundem, B. B. (1993) Ad notam Gyldendal, Oslo
63. Gundem, B. B. (1997) Universitetet i Oslo, Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt, Oslo
64. (2002) Peter Lang, New York
65. (1990) Falmer, London
66. Haney, W. (2000) The myth of the Texas miracle in education. 8:41 8:41
67. Haney, W. (2002) Lake Wobeguaranteed: Misuse of test scores in Massachusetts, Part 1. 10:24
68. Hanushek, E. A. (2002) National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
69. Hanushek, E. A. (2003) The failure of input-based schooling policies. 113:485, pp. 64-98.
70. Hanushek, E. A. (2006) Alternative school policies and the benefits of general cognitive skills. 25:4, pp. 447-462.
71. Hanushek, E. A. and Raymond, M. E. (2003) Lessons about the design of state accountability systems. pp. 127-151. Brookings, Washington, DC
72. Hanushek, E. A. and Raymond, M. E. (2005) Does school accountability lead to improved student performance?. 24:2, pp. 297-327.
73. Hargreaves, A. (2003) Teachers College Press, New York
74. (2002) Abstrakt, Oslo
75. (2005) Blackwell, Malden, MA
76. Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all seasons. 69:1, pp. 3-20.
77. Hood, C. (1995) Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm?.10:2, pp. 104-117.
78. Hood, C. (2004) Institutions, blame avoidance and negativity bias: Where public management reform meets the 'blame culture'. Paper presented at the CMPO Conference on Public Organisation and the New Public Management Bristol.
79. Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2004) Oxford University Press, Oxford
80. Hopmann, S. T. (1988) IPN, Kiel, Germany
81. Hopmann, S. T. (2000) Lehrplan des Abendlandes: Am Ende seiner Geschichte? Geschichte der Lehrplanarbeit und des Lehrplans seit 1900. pp. 377-400. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, Baltmannsweiler, Germany
82. Hopmann, S. T. (2001) Von der gutburgerlichen Kuche zu McDonald's: Beabsichtigte und unbeabsichtigte Folgen der Internationalisierung der Erwartungen an Schule und Unterricht. pp. 207-224. Beltz, Weinheim, Germany
83. Hopmann, S. T. (2003) On the evaluation of curriculum reforms. 35:4, pp. 459-478.
84. Hopmann, S. T. (2006) Im Durchschnitt Pisa oder: Alles bleibt schlechter. pp. 149-172. H.e.p., Bern
85. Hopmann, S. T. (2007) Keine Ausnahme fur Hottentotten: Methoden der vergleichenden Bildungswissenschaften fur die heilpadagogische Forschung. pp. 76-98. Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn, Germany
86. Hopmann, S. T. and Brinek, G. (2007) Introduction: PISA according to PISA: Does PISA keep what it promises. pp. 9-20. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
87. Hopmann, S. and Wulff, R. (1993) Bohlau Verlag, Cologne, Germany R.
88. (2007) Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
89. Hormann, B. (2007) Disappearing students: PISA and students with disabilities. pp. 157-174. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
90. Hovdenak, S. S. (2000) Gyldendal akademisk, Oslo
91. Huisken, F. (2005) VSA-Verlag, Hamburg, Germany
92. Ingersoll, R. M. (2003) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
93. Irons, J. E. and Harris, S. (2007) Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD
94. Jahnke, T. (2007) Deutsche Pisa-Folgen. pp. 305-320. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
95. Karlsen, G. E. (1993) Ad notam, Oslo
96. Karlsen, G. E. (1994) Tano, Oslo
97. Kirk-, Utdannings- og Forskningsdepartementet (KUF) (1994)KUF, Oslo
98. Kirk-, Utdannings- og Forskningsdepartementet (KUF) (1997) KUF, Oslo
99. Kivirauma, J., Klemala, K. and Rinne, R. (2006) Segregation, integration, inclusion: The ideology and reality in Finland. 21:2, pp. 117-133.
100. Klatt, B., Murphy, S. and Irvine, D. (2007) Bow River, Calgary, Canada
101. Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Dobrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., Reiss, K., Riquarts, K., Rost, J., Tenorth, H. E. and Vollmer, H. J. (2003) Bundesministerium fur Bilding und Forschung, Berlin
102. Koretz, D. M. (2002) Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators' productivity. 37:4, pp. 752-777.
103. Koritzinsky, T. (2000) Universitetsforlaget, Oslo
104. Korsgaard, O. (2004)Gyldendal, Copenhagen
105. (1998) Rugger, Zurich
106. Kvale, G. (2008) 'Det er ditt val!'-om fritt skuleval i to norske kommunar. [It's your choice! On free school choice in two Norwegian municipalities]. Cappelen, Oslo
107. Ladd, H. E. and Walsh, R. P. (2002) Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness. 21:1, pp. 1-17.
108. Ladenthin, V. (2004) Bildung als Aufgabe der Gesellschaft. 34:7172, pp. 305-319.
109. (2003) Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
110. (2004) Leske + Budrich, Opladen, Germany
111. Langfeldt, G. (2007) PISA-undressing the truth or dressing up a will to govern?. pp. 225-240. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
112. Langfeldt, G. (2008) Resultatstyring som verktøy og ideologi. Statlige styringsstrategier i utdanningssektoren. [Result management as tool and ideology. Nationalized management strategies in the education sector]. Cappelen, Oslo
113. (2008) Cappelen, Oslo
114. Le Floch, K. C., Martinez, J. F., O'Day, J., Stecher, B. M., Cook, A., Vernez, G., Birman, B. and Garet, M. (2007) Rand, Santa Monica, CA
115. Leibfried, S. and Zurn, M. (2006) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
116. Lie, S., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Ibsen, E. and Turmo, A. (2005) Universitetet i Oslo, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Oslo
117. Lindblad, S., Johannesson, I. A. and Simola, H. (2003) Education governance in transition: An introduction. 46:1, pp. 237-245.
118. Linn, R. L. (2000) Assessments and accountability. 29:2, pp. 4-16.
119. Linn, R. L. (2005) Issues in the design of accountability systems. pp. 78-98. Blackwell, Malden, MA
120. Linn, R. L. (2006) University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing [CRESST]), Los Angeles, CA
121. Linn, R. L. and Haug, C. (2002) Stability of school building accountability scores and gains. 24:1, pp. 29-36.
122. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L. and Betebenner, D. W. (2002) Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 31:6, pp. 3-16.
123. Lohmann, I. (2007)
124. Loveless, T. (2006) Brookings, Washington, DC
125. Luhmann, N. (1998) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
126. Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F. and Hamilton, L. S. (2006) RAND, Santa Monica, CA
127. Martineau, J. A. (2006) Distorting value-added: The use of longitudinal, vertically-scale student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability. 31:1, pp. 35-62.
128. McNeil, L. M. (2000) Routledge, New York
129. Mehrens, W. A. (1996) Consequences of assessment: What is the evidence?. 6:13
130. (2006) Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen
131. Melton, J. V. H. (1988) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
132. Meyer, J. W. (2005) Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Germany
133. Meyerhofer, W. (2007) Testfahigkeit: Was ist das?. pp. 57-92. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
134. Micklewright, J. and Schnepf, S. S. (2004) IZA, Bonn, Germany
135. Micklewright, J. and Schnepf, S. S. (2006) IZA, Bonn, Germany
136. Mintrop, H. (2003) The limit of sanctions in low-performing schools: A study of Maryland and Kentucky schools on probation. 11:3
137. Møller, J. (2003) Coping with accountability: A tension between reason and emotion. pp. 89-103. RoutledgeFalmer, London
138. Muir Grey, J. A. (1997) Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
139. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
140. (2002) Cappelen, Oslo
141. Neuwirth, E. (2006) OECD, Paris
142. NOU 1988:22
143. NOU 2003:16
144. Olsen, R. V. (2005)
145. Olsen, R. V. (2007) Large-scale international comparative achievement studies in education: Their primary purposes and beyond. pp. 265-294. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
146. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007) OECD, Paris
147. (2003) Brookings, Washington, DC
148. Picht, G. (1964) Walter-Verlag, Olten, Germany
149. Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2004) Oxford University Press, Oxford
150. Power, M. (1997) Oxford University Press, Oxford
151. Prahl, A. and Olsen, C. B. (1997) Nordisk Ministerråd, Copenhagen
152. Rasmussen, J. (2004) Hans Reitzel, Copenhagen
153. Rauin, U. (2004) Die Padagogik im Bann empirischer Mythen: Wie aus empirischen Vermutungen scheinbare padagogische Gewissheit wird. 32:1, pp. 39-49.
154. Rickover, H. G. (1963) Dutton, New York
155. Rindermann, H. (2006) Was messen internationale Schulleistungsstudien? Schulleistungen, Schulerfahigkeiten, kognitive Fahigkeiten, Wissen oder allgemeine Intelligenz?. 57:1, pp. 69-86.
156. Saunders, L. (1999) A brief history of educational 'value-added': How did we get to where we are?. 10:2, pp. 233-256.
157. (2000) Oxford University Press, Oxford
158. (2000) Oxford University Press, Oxford
159. Sedikides, C., Herbst, K. C., Hardin, D. P. and Dardis, G. J. (2002) Accountability as a deterrent to self-enhancement: The search for mechanisms. 83:3, pp. 592-605.
160. (1993) Westview, Boulder, CO
161. Simola, H. (2005) The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. 41:4, pp. 455-470.
162. Sivesind, K. Universitetet i Oslo, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Oslo
163. Sivesind, K., Bachmann, K. and Afzar, A. (2003) Læringssenteret, Oslo
164. Sivesind, K., Langfeldt, G. and Skedsmo, G. (2006) Cappelen akademisk, Oslo
165. Sjøberg, S. (2007) PISA and 'real life challenges': Mission impossible?.pp. 203-224. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
166. (2006) Unge Pædagoger, Copenhagen
167. Slagstad, R. (1998) Oslo Pax Forlag, Oslo
168. Slavin, R. E. (2007) Allyn & Bacon, Boston
169. Stack, M. (2006) Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. 29:1, pp. 49-69.
170. STM 29 (1994)
171. STM 30 (2003)
172. STM 37 (1990)
173. STM 47 (1995)
174. Sutherland, D. and Price, R. (2007) OECD, Paris
175. Swanson, C. B. and Stevenson, D. L. (2002) Standards-based reform in practice: Evidence on state policy and classroom instruction from the NAEP state assessments. 24:1, pp. 1-27.
176. Telhaug, A. O. (2005) Cappelen Akademisk, Oslo
177. Telhaug, A. O. (2006) Didakta, Oslo
178. Telhaug, A. O. and Mediås, O. A. (2003) Abstrakt, Oslo
179. Turmo, A. and Lie, S. (2004) Universitetet i Oslo, Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, Oslo S.
180. Tyler, R. W. (1949) University of Chicago Press, Chicago
181. Uljens, M. (2007) The hidden curriculum of PISA: The promotion of neo-liberal policy by educational assessment. pp. 295-304. Lit Verlag, Vienna and Berlin
182. US Department of Education (2007) US Department of Education, Washington, DC
183. Wallerstein, I. M. (2004) Duke University Press, Durham, NC
184. Watermann, R., Stanat, P., Kunter, M., Klieme, E. and Baumert, J. (2003) Schulruckmeldungen im Rahmen von Schulleistungsuntersuchungen: Das Disseminationskonzept von PISA-2000. 49:1, pp. 92-111.
185. Watson, S. and Supovitz, J. (2001) Autonomy and accountability in the context of standards-based reform. 9:32
186. Weigel, T. M. (2004)
187. Werler, T. (2004) Schneider Verlag, Baltmannsweiler, Germany
188. (2000) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
189. Whitford, B. L. and Jones, K. (2000) State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
190. Woessmann, L. and Fuchs, T. (2004)
191. Yrjola, P. (2005) Accountability policies and curriculum change: The case of Finland.
192. Zimmer, R., Gill, B., Razquin, Booker, K. and Lockwood, J. R. (2007) Rand, Santa Monica, CA
193. Zweigert, K. and Koetz, H. (1998) Oxford University Press, Oxford