Designing finance structures to satisfy equity and adequacy goals

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 13, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-28

  King, Richard A ^a,d   Swanson, Austin D ^b   Sweetland, Scott R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14744306330     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v13n15.2005     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Abbott v. Burke, 477 A.2d 1278 (1984); 495 A.2d.376 (1985); 575 A.2d.359 (N.J. 1990); 643 A.2d 575 (N.J. 1994); 693 A.2d 417 (1997); 710 A.2d.450 (N.J. 1998).
2. Augenblick, J. (1997). Recommendations for a base figure and pupil-weighted adjustments to the base figure for use in a new school finance system in Ohio. Columbus, OH: School Funding Task Force, Ohio Department of Education.
3. Augenblick, J., Alexander, K., & Guthrie, J. W. (1995). Report of the panel of experts: Proposals for the elimination of wealth based disparities in education Columbus, OH: Ohio State Education Department.
4. Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological, and empirical dimensions. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Board of Education v. Walter, 390 N.E.2d 813 (Ohio 1979); cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1015 (1980).
6. Burtless, G. (1996). Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
7. Campbell County School District v. State, 907 P.2d 1238 (Wyo. 1995).
8. Chambers, J. G., & Parrish, T. (1994). State level education finance. In H.J. Walberg and W. S. Barnett (Eds.), Cost analysis for education decisions: Methods and examples. Advances in educational productivity, Volume 4. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
9. Coalition for Adequacy and Fairness in School Funding v. Chiles, 680 So.2d 400 (Fla 1996).
10. Consortium on Renewing Education. (1998). 20/ 20 vision: A strategy for doubling America's academic achievement by the year 2020. Nashville, TN: Peabody Center for Education Policy, Vanderbilt University.
11. DeRolph v. State, 677 N.E. 733 (Ohio 1997); 728 N.E.2d 993 (Ohio 2000).
12. Duncombe, W., Ruggerio, J., & Yinger, J. (1996). Alternative approaches to measuring the cost of education. In H. F. Ladd, Ed., Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: Brookings.
13. Duncombe, W. D., & Yinger, J. M. (1999). Performance standards and educational cost indexes: You can't have one without the other. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. S. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 260-297). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Duncombe, W. D., & Yinger, J. M. (1997). Why is it so hard to help central city schools? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 1, 85-113.
15. Education Writers Association. (1989). Wolves at the schoolhouse door: An investigation of the condition of public school buildings. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Elmore, R. F. (1994). Thoughts on program equity: Productivity and Incentives for performance in education. Educational Policy, 8, 453-459.
17. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-498.
18. Ferguson, R. F. & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265-298). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
19. Goertz, M., & Edwards, M. (1999). The search for excellence for all: the courts and New Jersey school finance reform Journal of Education Finance, 25, 5-31.
20. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1994). When reinventing the wheel is not necessary: A case study in the use of meta-analysis in education finance. Journal of Education Finance, 20, 1-20.
21. Grissmer, D. (2001). Research directions for understanding the relationship of educational resources to educational outcomes. In S. Chaikind & W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Eds.), Education finance in the new millennium: AEFA 2001 Yearbook. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, pp.139-155.
22. Guthrie, J. W. (1997). School finance: Fifty years of expansion. The Future of Children, 7, 24-38.
23. Guthrie, J. W., Hayward, G. C., Smith, J. R., Rothstein, R., Bennett, R. W., Koppich, J. E., Bowman, E., DeLapp, L., Brandes, B., & Clark, S. (1997). A proposed cost-based block grant model for Wyoming school finance. Sacramento, CA: Management Analyst & Planning Associates, L.L.C.
24. Guthrie, J. W., & Rothstein, R. (2001). A new millennium and a likely new era of education finance. In S. Chaikind & W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Eds.). Education finance in the new millennium (pp. 99-119). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
25. Guthrie, J. W., & Rothstein, R. (1999). Enabling "adequacy" to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finance distribution arrangements. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. S. Hansen (Eds.). Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 209-259). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
27. Hanushek, E. A. (1991). When school finance "reform" may not be good policy. Harvard Journal on Education, 28, 423-456.
28. Hanushek, E. A. (1996a). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (Ed), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
29. Hanushek, E. A. (1996b). Outcomes, costs, and incentives in schools. In E. A. Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America's Schools: The role of incentives (pp. 29-52). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (1998). Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement (Working Paper 6691). Cambridge, MA National Bureau of Economic Research.
31. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994a). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
32. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994b). Money does matter somewhere: A reply to Hanushek Educational Researcher, 23, 9-10.
33. Hull v. Albrecht, 950 P.2d 1141 (Ariz. 1997); 960 P.2d 634 (Ariz. 1998).
34. King, J. A. (1994). Meeting the educational needs of at-risk students: A cost analysis of three models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 1-19.
35. rd edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Koski, W. S., & Levin, H. M. (2000). Twenty-five years after Rodriguez: What have we learned? Teachers Colley Record, 102, 480-513.
37. Ladd, H. F. (Ed). (1996). Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
38. Levin, H. M. (1994). The necessary and sufficient conditions for achieving educational equity. In R. Berne & L. O. Picus (Eds.), Outcome equity in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39. Miles, K. H. (1995). Freeing resources for improving schools: A case study of teacher allocation in Boston Public Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 476-493.
40. Miles, K. H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high performing schools. In W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Ed), Developments in school finance, 1997. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
41. Mnorini, P. A., & Sugarman, S. D. (1999). Educational adequacy and the courts: The promise and problems of moving to a new paradigm. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, and J. S. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 175-208). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. McDaniel v. Thomas, 285 S.E.2d 156 (Ga 1981).
43. McDuffy v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Education, 615 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 1993).
44. Moran, M. (1999). Standards and assessments: The new measure of adequacy in school finance litigation. Journal of Education Finance, 25, 33-80.
45. Morris, W. (Ed). (1969). The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin.
46. Morrison, H. C. (1943). American schools: A critical study of our school system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, 1999). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
48. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York Author.
49. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
50. National Research Council. (1999). Making money matter: Financing America's schools. Committee on Education Finance, H. F. Ladd and J. S. Hansen, editors. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. New American Schools. (2000). Tool kit for engaging a design-based assistance prouder: Guidelines for ensuring the quality of national design-based assistance providers. Arlington, VA Author.
52. No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). (2001). 20 USC 6301.
53. Odden, A. (1996). Incentives, school organization, and teacher compensation. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 226-256). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin.
55. nd edition). New York McGraw-Hill.
56. Osin, L., & Lesgold, A. (1996). A proposal for re-engineering of the educational system. Review of Educational Research, 66, 621-656.
57. Pautucket v. Sundlun, 662 A.2d 40 (R.I. 1995).
58. Reid Scott v. Commonwealth, 443 S.E.2d 138 (Va 1994).
59. Reschovsky A., & Imazeki, J. (2001). Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 373-396.
60. Robinson v. Cahill, 303 A.2d 273 (N.J. 1973).
61. Roosevelt Elementary School District v. Bishop, 877 P.2d 806 (Ariz. 1994).
62. Rose v. Council for Better Education, 790 S.W.2d 186 (Ky. 1989).
63. Skeen v. State, 505 N.W.2d 299 (Mnn. 1993).
64. Tennessee Small School Systems v. McWerter, 851 S.W.2d 139 (Tenn. 1993); 894 S.W.2d 734 (Tenn. 1995).
65. Underwood, J. K. (1989, Winter). Changing equal protection analyses in finance equity litigation. Journal of Education Finance, 14, 413-425.
66. Underwood, J. K. (1994, Fall). School finance litigation: Legal theories, judicial activism, and social neglect. Journal of Education Finance, 20, 143-162.
67. Underwood, J. (1995). School finance adequacy as vertical equity. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 28, 493-519.
68. st century. GAO/HEHS-95-95. Washington, DC: Author.
69. Veenman, S. (1995). Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 319-381.
70. Vincent v. Voight, 614 N.W.2d 388 (Wis. 2000).