Exploring the changing face of adequacy

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 81-103

  Alexander, Nicola A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645685028     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje7903_5     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alexander, N. A. (1998). The impact of curriculum standards on student performance: The case of New York State. Unpublished empirical analysis, University at Albany, State University of New York.
2. Alexander, N. A. (2002). Race, poverty, and the student curriculum: Implications for standards policy. American Education Research Journal, 39, 675–693.
3. Alexander, N. A. (2003). Considering equity and adequacy: An examination of the distribution of student class time as an educational resource in New York State, 1975–1995. Journal of Education Finance, 28, 357–381.
4. Allgood, W., & Rice, J. K. (2002). The adequacy of urban education: Focusing on teacher quality. In C. R. & J. K. Rice (Eds.), Fiscal policy in urban education (pp. 155–180). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
5. Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Betts, J. R., & Grogger, J. (2003). The impact of grading standards on student achievement, educational attainment, and entry-level earnings. Economics of Education Review, 22, 343–352.
7. Bishop, J. (1996). Incentives to study and the organization of secondary instruction. In W. E. Becker & W. J. Baumol (Eds.), Assessing educational practices: The contribution of economics (pp. 99–160). New York: Russell Sage.
8. Campaign for Fiscal Equity Inc. (2000). Reforming New York State’s flawed school finance system. In evidence: Policy reports from the CFE Trial. Volume 2. New York: Author.
9. Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. the State of New York et al. (State Supreme Court Appellate Division, 1993).
10. Carnoy, M. (1983). Educational adequacy: Alternative perspectives and their implications for educational finance. Journal of Education Finance, 8, 286–299.
11. Chambers, J. G. (1995). Public school teacher cost differences across the United States: Introduction to a teacher cost index (TCI). In W. Fowler (Ed.), Developments in school finance (pp. 21–32). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
12. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1997). Politics, markets, and the organization of schools. In E. Cohn (Ed.), Market approaches to education: Vouchers and school choice (pp. 275–303). New York: Elsevier Science.
13. Clune, W. H. (1994). The shift from equity to adequacy in school finance. Educational Policy, 8, 376–394.
14. Coleman, P. (1986). The good school district: A critical examination of the adequacy of student achievement and per pupil expenditures as measures of school district effectiveness. Journal of Education Finance, 12, 71–96.
15. Coons, J. E. (1978). Can education be equal and excellent? Journal of Education Finance, 4, 147–157.
16. Coons, J., Clune, W., & Sugarman, S. (1970). Private wealth and public education. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press/Harvard University Press.
17. Cuban, L. (1994). How can a “national” strategy miss a third of our schools? Education Digest, 59(5), 12–16.
18. Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Education Review, 58, 280–298.
19. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 5–24.
20. Edmonds, R. (1982). Programs of school improvement: An overview. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 4–11.
21. Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
22. Firestone, W. A. (1989). Educational policy as an ecology of games. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 18–24.
23. Garms, W. I. (1979). Measuring the equity of school finance systems. Journal of Education Finance, 4, 415–435.
24. Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25. Greene, M. (1982). Educational adequacy: A philosophical approach. New York: Not available separately; see EA 015 442.
26. Guthrie, J. W. (1983). Funding an “adequate” education. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 471–476.
27. Haller, E. J., Monk, D. H., Bear, A. S., Griffith, J., & Moss, P. (1990). School size and program comprehensiveness: Evidence from high school and beyond. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 109–120.
28. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.
29. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141–164.
30. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5–14.
31. Herrington, C. D., & Weider, V. (2001). Equity, adequacy and vouchers: Past and present school finance litigation in Florida. Journal of Education Finance, 21, 517–534.
32. Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
33. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.
34. Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1988). Curriculum tracking as mediating the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 61, 78–94.
35. Levin, H. M. (1991). Accelerating the progress of all students (Rep. No. 31). Albany, NY: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.
36. Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Malen, B. (1994). Enacting site based management: A political utilities analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 249–267.
38. Merriam-Webster, Inc. (1991). Webster’s ninth new collegiate dictionary (9th ed.). Springfield, MA: Author.
39. Miner, J. (1983). Estimates of adequate school spending by state based on national average service levels. Journal of Education Finance, 8, 316–342.
40. Moe, T. M. (1995). The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. In O. E. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond (2nd ed., pp. 116–153). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Moe, T. M. (1997). The positive theory of public bureaucracy. In D. C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice: A handbook (pp. 455–480). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Monk, D. (1992). Educational productivity research: An update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 307–332.
43. Monk, D. H. (1990). Educational finance: An economic approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Monk, D. H., & Haller, E. J. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offerings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 3–21.
45. Murphy, J., Beck, L. G., Crawford, M., Hodges, A., & McGaughy, C. L. (2001). The productive high school: Creating personalized academic communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
46. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
47. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education: A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American People. Washington, DC: Author.
48. National Research Council. (1999). Making money matter: Financing America’s schools. Committee on Education Finance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C.S. § 6301 et seq. (2003).
50. Oakes, J. (1990). Lost talent: The underparticipation of women, minorities, and disabled persons in science. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
51. Odden, A. (2000). The new school finance: Providing adequacy and improving equity. Journal of Education Finance, 25, 467–487.
52. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
53. Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy of School Funding. (2003, August). Briefs and decisions in DeRolph v. State of Ohio School Funding. Retrieved September 15, 2003, from the World Wide Web: Http://www.bricker.com/legalservices/practice/education/schoolfund/derolph3.asp
54. Reschovsky, A., & Imazeki, J. (2001). Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 26, 373–396.
55. Rose v. Council for Better Education, 790 S.W. 2d 186 (Ky. Supreme Court, 1989).
56. Ruling on school [Internet]. (2002). Retrieved from http://1010wins.com/StoryFolder/story_181631662_html/index.html
57. Sadovnik, A. R., Peter, W., Cookson, J., & Semel, S. F. (Eds.). (2001). Exploring education: An introduction to the foundations of education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
58. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
59. Strayer, G., & Haig, R. (1923). Financing of education in the State of New York. New York: Macmillan.
60. Stevens, J. B. (1993). The economics of collective choice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
61. Ward, J. G. (1991). Why educational adequacy remains an elusive goal. School Administrator, 48, 13–15.
62. Wise, A. E. (1983). Educational adequacy: A concept in search of meaning. Journal of Education Finance, 8, 300–315.