District fiscal policy and student achievement: Evidence from combined NAEP-CCD data

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 10, Issue , 2002, Pages

  Huang, Gary G ^a   Yu, Binbing ^a  

^a Synectics for Mgmt Decisions Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042537235     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Admundson, K. J. (1993). Restructuring Reform and Reality: What School Districts Are Really Doing. NSBA Best Practices Series 1993. Alexandria VA: National School Boards Association ERIC Document No. ED360699.
2. Allen, N. L., Kline, D. L., & Zelenak, C. A. (1997). The NAEP 1994 Technical Report. NCES 97-897. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
3. Arnold, C. L. (1995). Using HLM and NAEP Data to Explore School Correlates of 1990 Mathematics and Geometry Achievement in Grades 4 8 12: Methodology and Results. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
4. Brent, B. O., Roellke, C. F., & Monk, D. H. (1997). Understanding Teacher Resource Allocation in New York State Secondary Schools: A Case Study Approach. Journal of Education Finance 23 2 207-33.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.
6. Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. T. (1996). Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L Programs. Chicago IL: Scientific Software International.
7. Chambers, J., & Fowler, W. J., Jr. (1995). Public School Teacher Cost Differences Across the United States: An Analysis to Develop a Teacher Cost Index (TCI). Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
8. Childs, T. S., & Shakeshaft, C. (1986). A Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship between Educational Expenditures and Student Achievement. Journal of Education Finance 12 2 249-63.
9. Clune, W. H. (1993). Systemic educational policy: a conceptual framework. In Furhman S. H. (Ed.). Designing coherent education policy. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
10. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques third edition. New York: John Wiley.
11. Cohen, M. P., & Huang, G.G. (2000). Analyzing Survey Data by Complete-Case and Available-Case Methods: Alternatives to Imputation. Paper presented at the American Statistical Association Annual Conference Indianapolis IN.
12. Conn, W. L. (1995). Funding fundamentals: the cost/quality debate in school reform. West's Education Law Quarterly 4 1 123-139.
13. Deville, J. C., & Sarndal, C. E. (1992). Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 87 376-382.
14. Deville, J. C., Sarndal, C. E., & Sautory, O. (1993). Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 1013-1020.
15. DeYoung, A. (1990). Introduction. In A. DeYoung (Ed.). Rural education: Issues and practice. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
16. Doyle, D., & Finn, C. (1984). American schools and the future of local control. Public Interest 77 77-95.
17. Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (1998). School Finance Reform: Aid Formulas and Equity Objectives. National Tax Journal 51 2 239-62.
18. Elmore, R. F. (1994). Thoughts on program equity: productivity and incentives for performance in education. Educational Policy 8 4 453-459.
19. Elmore, R. F. (1993). The role of local school districts in instructional improvement. Furhman S. H. (Ed.). Designing coherent education policy. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
20. Fay, R. E. (1995). VPLX. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
21. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Racial Patterns in How School and Teacher Quality Affect Achievement and Earnings. Challenge 2 1 1-35.
22. Forsyth, R., Hambleton, R., Linn, R., Mislevy, R., & Yen, W. (1996). Design/Feasibility Team Report to the National Assessment Governing Board. NAGB web site.
23. Fowler, W. J., Jr., & Monk, D. H. (2001). A Primer for Making Cost Adjustments in Education NCES 2001-323 Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics.
24. Fuhrman, S. H., & Elmore, R. F. (1995). Ruling Out Rules: The Evolution of Deregulation in State Education Policy. New Brunswick NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education ERIC Document No. ED383057.
25. Fuhrman, S. H., & Elmore, R. F. (1990). Understanding local control in the wake of state educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis 12 82-96.
26. General Accounting Office. (1998). School Finance: State and Federal Efforts To Target Poor Students. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/HEHS-98-36. General Accounting Office Washington DC.
27. Guskey, T. R. (1993). Policy Issues and Options When States Take Over Local School Districts. International Journal of Educational Reform 2 1 68-71.
28. Hajek, J. (1981). Sampling from a Finite Population. New York: Marcel Dekker.
29. Hannaway, J. (1993). Political Pressure and Decentralization in Institutional Organizations: The Case of School Districts. Sociology of Education 66 3 147-63.
30. Hannaway, J. (1992). School Districts: The Missing Link in Education Reform. New Brunswick NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. ERIC Document No. ED359644.
31. Hanushek, E. A. (1996). School resources and student performance. In Burtless G. (Ed.). Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
32. Hanushek, E. A. (1994). A Jaundiced view of "adequacy" in school finance reform. Educational Policy 8 4 460-469.
33. Hedges, L. V., & Greenwald, R. (1996). Have times changed? The Relation between school resources and student performance. In Burtless G. (Ed.). Does Money Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
34. Hough, J. R. (1993). Educational Finance Issues in North America. Education Economics 1 1 35-42.
35. Hussar, W., & Sonnenberg, W. (1999). Trends in disparities in school district level expenditures per pupil. NCES 1999-017. Washington DC: NCES.
36. Iannaccone, L., & Lutz, F. W. (1994). The Crucible of Democracy: The Local Arena. Journal of Education Policy 9 5&6 39-52.
37. Johnson, E. G. (1989). Considerations and Techniques for the Analysis of NAEP Data. Journal of Educational Statistics 14 303-334.
38. Johnson, E. G., & Allen, N. L. (1992). The NAEP 1990 Technical Report. NCES 92-067. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
39. Johnson, E. G., Mazzeo, J., & Kline, D. L. (1994). Technical Report of the NAEP 1992 Trial State Assessment Program in Reading. NCES 94-472. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
40. Johnson, E. G., & Rust, K. F. (1992). Population Inferences and Variance Estimation for NAEP Data. Journal of Educational Statistics 17 175-190.
41. Kazal-Thresher, D. M. (1993). Educational expenditures and school achievement: When and how money can make a difference. Educational Researcher 22 2 30-32.
42. Keedy, J. L. (1994). The Twin Engines of School Reform for the 1990s: The School Sites and National Coalitions. Journal of School Leadership 4 1 94-111.
43. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1995). Another look at high school restructuring. More evidence that it improves student achievement and more insight into why. Issues in Restructuring Schools. No. 9.
44. Levine, R., & Christenson, B. (1998). Public School Districts in the United States: A Statistical Profile 1987-88 to 1993-94. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES-98-203. Washington DC: American Institutes for Research.
45. Little, J. A. (1993). Post-Stratification: A Modeler's Perspective. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 1001-1012.
46. Little, J. A., & Wu, M.-M. (1991). Models for Contingency Tables with Known Margins When Target and Sampled Populations Differ. Journal of the American Statistical Association 86 87-95.
47. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.
48. Lockwood, A. T. (1994). The Future of school finance. Focus in Change no.13. Madison WI: Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
49. Marsh, D. D. (1997). School Reform and Decentralization in the United States: The National Alliance Experience. ED409606. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago IL March 24-28 1997).
50. Monk, D. H., & Hussain, S. (2000). Structural influences on the internal allocation of school district resources: Evidence from New York State. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 1 1-26.
51. Murphy, J. (1994). Principles of School-Based Management. Chapel Hill NC: North Carolina Educational Policy Research Center. ERIC Document No. ED373414.
52. Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1988). Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. Journal of Educational Research 81 175-181.
53. Nachtigal, P. (1982). Education in rural America: an overview. In P. Nachtigal (Ed.). Rural education: In search of a better way. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
54. National Assessment Governing Board. (1999). The National Assessment of Educational Progress: Design 2000-2010. Adopted Unanimously by The National Assessment Governing Board June 23 1999. Washington DC: NAGB.
55. National Center for Education Statistics. (1995). Common Core of Data (CCD). Includes Data From 1987/88-1992/93. Installation Guide. Washington DC: the author.
56. National Center for Education Statistics (1996). The Condition of Education 1996. Washington DC: the author.
57. New York State Education Department. (1992). Study on the Generation of Revenues for Education. New York State Board of Regents. Final Report. ERIC ACCESSION No. ED383106.
58. Newmann, F. M., & Wahlage, G. G. (1995). Successful School Restructuring: A Report to the Public and Educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
59. Payne, K. J., & Biddle, R. J. (1999). Poor school funding child poverty and mathematics achievement. Educational Researcher 28 6 4-13.
60. Pellegrino, J. W., Jones, L. R., & Mitchell, K. J. (Eds.). (1999). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Evaluating NAEP and Transforming the Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
61. Porter, A. C. (1994). National equity and school autonomy. Educational Policy 8 4 489-500.
62. Protheroe, N. (1997). ERS-Local School Budget Profile Study. School Business Affairs 6310 42-29.
63. Rasbash, J., & Woodhouse, G. (1995). MLn Command Reference Version 1.0. London UK: University of London.
64. Raudenbush, S. W., Kidchanapanish, S., & Kang, S. J. (1991). The effects of pre-primary access and quality on educational achievement in Thailand. Comparative Education Review, 35, 255-273.
65. Reese, C. M., Miller, K. E., Mazzeo, J., & Dossey, J. A. (1997). NAEP 1996 Mathematics Report Card for the Nation and the States.Washington DC: NCES.
66. Rust, K., Burke, J., Fahimi, M., & Wallace, L. (1992). 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress Sampling and Weighting Procedures Part 2- National Assessment. Rockville MD: Westat Inc.
67. Shao, J., & Tu, D. (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap. New York: Springer-Verlag.
68. Sharp, W. L. (1993). School Spending: Is There a Relationship between Spending and Student Achievement? A Correlation Study of Illinois Schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Finance Association (Albuquerque NM March 1993). ERIC Document No. ED357503.
69. Strang, D. (1987). The Administrative transformation of American education: school district consolidation 1938-1980. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 352-366.
70. Wainer, H. (1993). Does Spending Money on Education Help? A Reaction to the Heritage Foundation and the "Wall Street Journal." Educational Researcher 22 9 22-24.
71. Walberg, H. J., & Walberg, H. J. III. (1994). Losing local control. Educational Researcher 23 6 19-26.
72. Wallace, L., & Rust, K. (1994). 1992 National Assessment of Educational Progress Sampling and Weighting Procedures Final Report. Rockville MD: Westat Inc.
73. Weng, S. S., Zhang, F., & Cohen, M. P. (1995). Variance Estimates Comparison by Statistical Software. ASA 1995 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria VA: American Statistical Association.
74. Wenglinsky, H. (1997). How money matters: the effect of school district spending on academic achievement. Sociology of Education 70 3221-237.
75. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Finance equalization and within-school equity: the relationship between education spending and the social distribution of achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 20 4 269-283.
76. Westat Inc. (1998). ESSI Work Task 1.2.76.1 1990 Through 1990 NAEP Samples: NCES Identifiers. (Contract report and memorandum to NCES). Rockville MD: Westat.
77. Westat Inc. (1996). A User's Guide to WesVar PC Version 2.0. Rockville MD.
78. Wolter, K. M. (1985) Introduction to Variance Estimation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
79. Woodhouse, G. (ed.) (1995). A Guide to MLn for New Users. London UK: Institute of Education University of London.