Newspapers as policy actors in urban school systems: The Chicago story

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 210-246

  Wong, Kenneth K ^a   Jain, Pushpam ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDIA INDUSTRY;

EID: 0032750485     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/10780879922184365     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baumgartner, F., and B. Jones. 1993. Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
2. Chaffee, S., and S. Frank. 1996. How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:48-58.
3. Chicago journal: Image gleams in a booming economy and real estate market. 1997. New York Times, 15 July.
4. Clark, T., and L. Ferguson. 1983. City money: Political processes, fiscal strain, and retrenchment. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
5. Dahl, R. 1961. Who governs? New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
6. Education Writers Association (EWA). 1997. Good news, bad news. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Goldenberg, E. 1984. Prerequisites for access to the press. In Media power in politics, edited by D. Graber, 231-38. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
8. Graber, D. 1980. Mass media and American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
9. Grimshaw, W. 1979. Union rule in the schools: Big-city politics in transformation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
10. Henig, J. 1994. Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
11. Herbst, S. 1996. Public expression outside the mainstream. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:120-31.
12. Iyengar, S. 1992. The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. In The mass media in liberal democratic societies, edited by S. Rothman, 85-102. New York: Paragon.
13. Iyengar, S., M. Peters, and D. Kinder. 1984. Experimental demonstrations of the "not-so-minimal" consequences of television news programs. In Media power in politics, edited by D. Graber, 54-60. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
14. Janowitz, M. 1978. The last half-century: Societal change and politics in America. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
15. Jones, B., and L. Hill. 1998. Strategies and tactics in subsystem protection: The politics of education reform in Montgomery County, Maryland. In Changing urban education, edited by C. Stone. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
16. Kepplinger, H. 1992. Put in the public spotlight - Instrumental actualization of actors, events, and aspects in the coverage of Nicaragua. In The mass media in liberal democratic societies, edited by S. Rothman, 201-20. New York: Paragon.
17. Kerbel, M. 1995. Remote and controlled. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18. Lazarsfield, P., B. Berelson, and H. Gaudet. 1944. The people's choice. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
19. Lippmann, W. 1984. Newspapers. In Media power in politics, edited by D. Graber, 73-80. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
20. Lipsky, M. 1970. Protest in city politics: Rent strikes, housing, and the power of the poor. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21. McKersie, W. 1996. Reforming Chicago's public schools: Philanthropic persistence, 1987-1993. In Advances in educational policy: Vol. 2. Rethinking school reform in Chicago, edited by K. Wong, 141-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
22. McQuail, D. 1984. The influence and effects of mass media. In Media power in politics, edited by D. Graber, 36-53. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
23. Mirel, J. 1993. The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907-81. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
24. New media may excite, while old media may attract. 1997. Chicago Tribune, 28 July, 2.
25. Noelle-Neumann, E. 1992. The contribution of spiral of silence theory to an understanding of mass media. In The mass media in liberal democratic societies, edited by S. Rothman, 75-84. New York: Paragon.
26. Page, B. 1996. Who deliberates? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
27. Paletz, D., and R. Entmann. 1984. Accepting the system. In Media power in politics, edited by D. Graber, 81-88. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
28. Patterson, T. 1996. Bad news, bad governance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:97-108.
29. Peterson, P. 1976. School politics, Chicago style. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
30. _. 1981. City limits. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
31. _. 1995. When federalism works. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32. Ravitch, D. 1974. The great school wars: A history of the New York City public schools. New York: Basic Books.
33. Royko, M. 1971. Boss: Richard J. Daley of Chicago. New York: Dutton.
34. Schneider, M., P. Teske, M. Marschall, M. Mintrom, and C. Roch. 1997. Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review 91 (1): 82-93.
35. Smith, K., and K. Meier. 1995. The case against school choice. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
36. Stone, C. 1998. Introduction: Urban education in political context. In Changing urban education, edited by C. Stone, 1-22. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
37. Wong, K. 1990. City choices: Education and housing. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
38. Wong, K., R. Dreeben, L. Lynn, and G. Sunderman. 1997. Integrated governance as a reform strategy in the Chicago public schools. Report from the Department of Education and Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
39. Wong, K., and G. Sunderman. 1996. Redesigning accountability at the systemwide level: The politics of school reform in Chicago. In Advances in educational policy: Vol. 2. Rethinking school reform in Chicago, edited by K. Wong, 3-30. Greenwich, CT: JAI.