Revisiting field education standards

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 173-188

  Raskin, Miriam S ^a   Wayne, Julianne ^b   Bogo, Marion ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46449130334     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600142     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alperin, D. E. (1996). Empirical research on student assessment in field education: What have we learned?The Clinical Supervisor,14(1), 149-161.
2. Bennett, L., & Coe, S. (1998). Social work field instructor satisfaction with faculty field liaison. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 345-352.
3. Bogo, M., & Globerman, J. (1999). Inter-organizational relationships between schools of social work and field agencies: Testing a framework for analysis. Journal of Social Work Education, 35,265-274.
4. Bogo, M. (2005). Field instruction in social work: A review of the research literature, 1999-2005. The Clinical Supervisor,24(1/2), 163-193.
5. Bogo, M., Raskin, M., & Wayne, J. (2002). Thinking out of the box: Developing new approaches for field education.New York: Field Consortium.
6. Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Woodford, M., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006). Beyond competencies: Field instructors' descriptions of student performance. Journal of Social Work Education, 42,579-593.
7. Bonwell, C. C., & Eisen, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1.Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
8. Brownstein, C., Smith, H. Y., & Faria, G. (1991). The liaison role: A three phase study of the schools, the field, the faculty. In D. Schneck, B. Grossman, & U. Glass-man (Eds.), Field education in social work: Contemporary issues and trends (pp. 237-248). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
9. Bruner, J. S. (1976). Towards a theory of instruction.New York: Norton.
10. Burke, S. G., Condon, S., & Wickell, B. (1999). The field liaison role in schools of social work: A break with the past. The Clinical Supervisor,18(1), 203-210.
11. Council on Social Work Education. (1965). Curriculum policy statement. New York: Author.
12. Council on Social Work Education. (1965). Manual of accrediting standards for graduate professional schools of social work. New York: Author.
13. Council on Social Work Education. (1967). Undergraduate programs in social welfare: A guide to objectives, content, field experience, and organization.New York: Author.
14. Council on Social Work Education. (1982). Curriculum policy for the master's degree and baccalaureate degree programs in social work education. New York: Author.
15. Council on Social Work Education. (1984, Revised). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures. New York: Author.
16. Council on Social Work Education. (1991, Revised). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures.Alexandria, VA: Author.
17. Council on Social Work Education. (1994). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures. Alexandria, VA: Author.
18. Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
19. Damron-Rodriguez, J. (2006). Moving ahead: Developing geriatric social work competencies. In B. Berkman et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Work in Health and Aging (pp. 1051-1068). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
21. Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287,226-235.
22. Faria, F., Brownstein, C., & Smith, H. Y. (1988). A survey of field instructors' perceptions of the liaison role. Journal of Social Work Education, 24,135-144.
23. Fortune, A. E., & Abramson, J. S. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor,11(1), 95-110.
24. Fortune, A. E., Feathers, C. E., Rook, S. R., Scrimenti, R. M., Smollen, P., Stemerman, P., et al. (1985). Student satisfaction with field placement. Journal of Social Work Education,21(3), 92-104.
25. Fortune, A. E., Miller, J., Rosenblum, A. F., Sanchez, B. M., Smith, C., & Reid, W. J. (1995). Further explorations of the liaison role: A view from the field. In G. Rogers (Ed.), Social work field education: Views and visions (pp. 273-293). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
26. Frumkin, M. (1980). Social work education and the professional commitment fallacy: A practical guide to field-school relations. Journal of Education for Social Work,16(2), 91-99.
27. Gambrill, E. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards: Do they work for clients?Journal of Social Work Education, 37,226-239.
28. Gingerich, W. J., Kaye, K. M., & Bailey, D. (1999). Assessing quality in social work education: Focus on diversity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,24(2), 119-129.
29. Globerman, J., & Bogo, M. (2003). Changing times: Understanding Social Workers' Motivation to be Field Instructors. Social Work, 48,65-73.
30. Hatcher, R. L., & Lassiter, K. D. (2007). Initial training in professional psychology: The practicum competencies outlined. Training and Education in Professional Psychology,1(1), 49-63.
31. Ivry, J., Lawrance, F. R., Damron-Rodriguez, J., & Robbins, V. C. (2005). Fieldwork rotation: A model for educating social work students for geriatric social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 407-425.
32. Jarman-Rhode, L., McFall, J., Kolar, P., & Strom, G. (1997). The changing context of social work practice: Implications and recommendations for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 29-46.
33. Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins Jr., F.L., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., Nelson, P. D., et al. (2004). Competencies conference: Future directions in education and cre-dentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60,699-712.
35. Kelly, J., & Horder, W. (2001). The how and the why: Competencies and holistic practice. Social Work Education, 20, 689-699.
36. Kendall, K. A. (2000). Social work education: Its origins in Europe. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
37. Kilpatrick, A. C., Turner, J., & Holland, T. P. (1994). Quality control in field education: Monitoring students' performance. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,9(1/2), 107-120.
38. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Lager, P. B., & Robbins, V. C. (2004). Field education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 3-11.
40. Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Miller, I. (1977). Supervision in social work. In Encyclopedia of Social Work (17th ed., pp. 1544-1551). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
42. Raphael, F. B., & Rosenblum, A. F. (1987). An operational guide to the faculty field liaison role. Social Casework, 68(3),156-163.
43. Raskin, M. (1983). A Delphi study in field instruction: Identification of issues and research priorities by experts. Arete,8(2), 38-48.
44. Raskin, M. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30,75-88.
45. Reisch, M. (2006). Workforce study falls short. Social Work,51(4), 291-293.
46. Renner, P. (1999). The art of teaching adults. Vancouver, BC: Training Associates, Ltd.
47. Robinson, V. (1936). Supervision in social casework.Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
48. Rogers, G. (Ed.). (1995). Social work field education: Views and visions.Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
49. Rosenblum, A. F., & Raphael, F. B. (1983). The role and function of the faculty field liaison. Journal of Education for Social Work, 19(7), 67-73.
50. Royce, D. (2001). Teaching tips for college and university instructors.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
51. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Sheafor, B. W., & Jenkins, L. E. (Eds.). (1982). Quality field instruction in social work. New York: Longman.
53. Shein, E. H. (1972). Professional education: Some new directions.New York: McGraw-Hill.
54. Showers, N. (1990). Hospital graduate social work field programs: A study in New York City. Health and Social Work,15(2), 55-63.
55. Skinner, K., & Whyte, B. (2004). Going beyond training: Theory and practice in managing learning. Social Work Education,23(4), 365-381.
56. Smith, H. Y., Faria, G., & Brownstein, C. (1986). Social work faculty in the role of liaison: A field study. Journal of Social Work Education, 22(3), 68-78.
57. Unger, J. M. (2003). Supporting agency field instructors in Forgotonia: Challenges faced by rural BSW programs. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,23(1/2), 105-121.
58. Valentine, D. (2004). Access to higher education: A challenge to social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 179-183.
59. Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2006). The need for radical change in field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 42,161-169.