Identification of protein kinase substrates by proteomic approaches

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 497-505

  Hattori, Seisuke ^a,b,c   Iida, Naoyuki ^a   Kosako, Hidetaka ^b,d  

^a KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c IREIIMS Institute   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

Author keywords

2D DIGE; IMAC; KESTREL; Kinase; LC MS; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Phosphoproteome; Prefractionation; SILAC

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; PROTEIN KINASE;

ENZYME SUBSTRATE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STOICHIOMETRY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEOMICS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 45749153039     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.5.3.497     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Hunter T. Signaling - 2000 and beyond. Cell 100, 113-127 (2000).
2. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R et al. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298, 1912-1934 (2002).
3. Johnson SA, Hunter T. Kinomics: methods for deciphering the kinome. Nat. Methods 2, 17-25 (2005).
4. Ptacek J, Snyder M. Charging it up: global analysis of protein phosphorylation. Trends Genet. 22, 545-554 (2006). •• Excellent review on experimental systems for the identification of kinase substrates.
5. Witze ES, Old WM, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 798-806 (2007).
6. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648 (2006). •• Describes the identification of 6600 phosphorylation sites in HeLa cells and analyzes temporal changes of the phosphorylation after EGF stimulation.
7. Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1488-1493 (2007).
8. Gorg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 4, 3665-3685 (2004).
9. Steinberg TH, Agnew BJ, Gee KR et al. Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using multiplexed proteomics technology. Proteomics 3, 1128-1144 (2003).
10. Inagaki N, Katsuta K. Large gel two-dimensional electrophoresis: improving recovery of cellular proteome. Current Proteomics 1, 35-39 (2004).
11. Righetti PG, Castagna A, Herbert B et al. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3, 1397-1407 (2003).
12. Stasyk T, Huber LA. Zooming in: fractionation strategies in proteomics. Proteomics 4, 3704-3716 (2004).
13. Lewis TS, Hunt JB, Aveline LD et al. Identification of novel MAP kinase pathway signaling targets by functional proteomics and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell 6, 1343-1345 (2000).
14. Roberts EC, Hammond K, Traish AM et al. Identification of G2/M targets for the MAP kinase pathway by functional proteomics. Proteomics 6, 4541-4553 (2006).
15. Ueda K, Kosako H, Fukui Y, Hattori S. Proteomic identification of Bcl2-associated athanogene 2 as a novel MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 41815-41821 (2004). •• Demonstrates the efficacy of the system consisting of phosphoprotein purification followed by 2D-DIGE.
16. Baud V, Karin M. Mammalian MAP kinase signaling cascades. Nature 410, 37-40 (2001).
17. Machida M, Kosako H, Shirakabe K et al. Purification of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and its application to phosphoproteome analysis. FEBS J. 274, 1576-1587 (2007).
18. Oda Y, Huang K, Cross FR et al. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6591-6596 (1999). • First study describing the usefulness of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) in quantitative study by liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS).
19. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002).
20. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3, 1154-1169 (2004).
21. Blagoev B, Ong SE, Kratchmarova I, Mann M. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1139-1145 (2004). •• Beautiful study on the tyrosine kinase signaling pathway in HeLa cells analyzed by LC-MS with SILAC.
22. Amanchy R, Kalume DE, Iwahori A et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of HeLa cells using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). J. Proteome Res. 4, 1661-1671 (2005).
23. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 310-327 (2005).
24. Munton RP, Tweedie-Cullen R, Livingstone-Zatchej M et al. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of protein phosphorylation in naive and stimulated mouse synaptosomal preparations. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6, 283-293 (2007). • Describes a method for absolute quantitation of a cell-derived phosphopeptide by LC-MS.
25. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
26. Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2193-2198 (2007).
27. Molina H, Horn DM, Tang N et al. Global proteomic profiling of phosphopeptides using electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2199-2220 (2007).
28. Oda Y, Nagasu T, Chait BT. Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 379-382 (2001).
29. Tao WA, Wollscheid B, O'Brien R et al. Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis using a dendrimer conjugation chemistry and tandem mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2, 591-598 (2005).
30. Neville DC, Rozanas CR, Price EM et al. Evidence for phosphorylation of serine 753 in CFTR using a novel metal-ion affinity resin and matrix-assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 6, 2436-2445 (1997).
31. Posewitz MC, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem. 71, 2883-2892 (1999).
32. Sano A, Nakamura H. Titania as a chemoaffinity support for the column-switching HPLC analysis of phosphopeptides: application to the characterization of phosphorylation sites in proteins by combination with protease digestion and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Sci. 20, 861-864 (2004).
33. Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON et al. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 873-886 (2005).
34. Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12130-12135 (2004)
35. Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 301-305 (2002).
36. Collins MO, Yu L, Coba MP et al. Proteomic analysis of in vivo phosphorylated synaptic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5972-5982 (2005).
37. Reinders J, Sickmann A. State-of-the-art in phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 5, 4052-4061 (2005).
38. Kokubu M, Ishihama Y, Sato T et al. Specificity of immobilized metal affinity-based IMAC/C18 tip enrichment of phosphopeptides for protein phosphorylation analysis. Anal. Chem. 77, 5144-5154 (2005).
39. Kinoshita E, Yamada A, Takeda H et al. Novel immobilized zinc (II) affinity chromatography for phosphopeptides and phosphorylated proteins. J. Sep. Sci. 28, 155-162 (2005).
40. Sugiyama N, Masuda T, Shinoda K et al. Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxy acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LC-MS/MS in proteomics applications. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6, 1103-1109 (2007).
41. Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M et al. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods 4, 231-237 (2007).
42. Steen H, Jebanathirajah JA, Rush J et al. Phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry: myths, facts, and the consequences for qualitative and quantitative measurements. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 172-181 (2006).
43. Zhang H, Zha X, Tan Y et al. Phosphoprotein analysis using antibodies broadly reactive against phosphorylated motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39379-39387 (2002).
44. Ubersax JA, Ferrell JE Jr. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 530-541 (2007).
45. Kane S, Sano H, Liu SC et al. A method to identify serine kinase substrates. Akt phosphorylates a novel adipocyte protein with a Rab GTPase-activating protein (GAP) domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22115-22118 (2002).
46. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007). • Analyzes the substrates of ATM/ATR kinases by immunoprecipitation with motif-specific antibodies followed by quantitative phosphopeptide identification by LC-MS.
47. Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ. The use of in vitro peptide-library screens in the analysis of phosphoserine/threonine-binding domain structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 225-244 (2004).
48. Lowery DM, Clauser KR, Hjerrild M et al. Proteomic screen defines the Polo-box domain interactome and identifies Rock2 as a Plk1 substrate. EMBO J. 26, 2262-2273 (2007).
49. Fukunaga R, Hunter T. Identification of MAPK substrates by expression screening with solid-phase phosphorylation. Methods Mol. Biol. 250, 211-236 (2004).
50. Cohen P, Knebel A. KESTREL: a powerful method for identifying the physiological substrates of protein kinases. Biochem. J. 393(Pt 1), 1-6 (2006).
51. Eblen ST, Kumar NV, Shah K et al. Identification of novel ERK2 substrates through use of an engineered kinase and ATP analogs. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 14926-14935 (2003).
52. Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 438, 679-684 (2005). •• Describes the results of in vitro identification of kinase substrates using a protein chip and in vivo validation of the candidate substrates.
53. MacBeath G, Schreiber SL. Related printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760-1763 (2000).
54. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293, 2101-2105 (2001).
55. Dephoure N, Howson RW, Blethrow JD et al. Combining chemical genetics and proteomics to identify protein kinase substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17940-17945 (2005). • Describes the high-throughput screening system of the kinase substrates using a protein chip and a genetically engineered kinase.
56. Phospho.ELM database http://phospho.elm.eu.org (Accessed July 2007)
57. PhosphoSite® protein database www.phosphosite.org