Perceived fairness of web-based applicant screening procedures: Weighing the rules of justice and the role of individual differences

Human Resource Management

Volumn 43, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 127-145

  Dineen, Brian R ^a   Noe, Raymond A ^b   Wang, Chongwei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544319984     PISSN: 00904848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20011     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Arvey, R. D., Gordon, M. E., Massengill, D. P., & Mussio, S. J. (1975). Differential dropout rates of minority and majority job candidates due to "time-lags" between selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 28, 175-180.
3. Arvey, R. D., & Sackett, P. R. (1993). Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 171-202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296-304.
5. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
6. Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2001). Relational agents: A model and implementation of building user trust. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, pp. 396-403.
7. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Bowen, D. E., Gilliland, S. W., & Folger, R. (1999, Winter). HRM and service fairness: How being fair with employees spills over to customers. Organizational Dynamics, 7-23.
9. Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58-76.
10. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.
11. Cappelli, P. (2001, March). Making the most of online recruiting. Harvard Business Review, 139-146.
12. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
14. Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational Justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). London: Wiley.
17. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2003). Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 7-39.
18. Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction: Person-organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 723-734.
19. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51-90.
20. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694-734.
21. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
22. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
23. Greenberg, J., & Lind, E. A. (2000). The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application. In C.L. Cooper & E.A. Locke (Eds.), I/O psychology: Linking theory with practice (pp. 72-108). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
24. Grienberger, I., Rutte, C., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Influence of social comparisons of out-comes and procedures on fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 913-919.
25. Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. (1977). Statistical methods for social scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc.
26. Heilman, M. E., Martell, R. F., & Simon, R. (1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicants. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 98-110.
27. Hertzum, M., Andersen, H. H. K., Andersen, V., & Hansen, C. B. (2002). Trust in information sources: Seeking information from people, documents, and virtual agents. Interacting with Computers, 14, 575-599.
28. Jones, A. J. I. (2002). On the concept of trust. Decision Support Systems, 33, 225-232.
29. Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D., Jr. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 261-271.
30. Karren, R., & Barringer, M. (2000). An analysis of the policy-capturing method: Issues and suggestions. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
31. Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (2002). The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 906-924.
32. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
33. Leonard, B. (2000, August). Online and over-whelmed, HR Magazine, 37-42.
34. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
35. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167-218). Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber Publishers.
36. Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748.
37. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64, 50-64.
38. Muir, B. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1905-1922.
39. Murphy, K., Thornton, G., III, & Reynolds, D. (1990). College students' attitudes towards employee drug testing programs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 615-631.
40. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3-16.
41. Reynolds, D. H., & Lin, L. F. (2003). An unfair platform? Subgroup reactions to Internet selection techniques. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychologists, Orlando, FL.
42. Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counter-productive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66-80.
43. Ryan, A. M., Greguras, G., & Ployhart, R. E. (1996). Perceived job relatedness of physical ability testing for firefighters: Exploring variations in reactions. Human Performance, 9, 219-240.
44. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants' perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565-606.
45. Rynes, S. (1993). Who's selecting whom? Effects of selection practices on applicant attitudes and behaviors. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 240-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., Jr., & Gerhart, B. (1991). The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487-521.
47. Rynes, S. L., Weber, C. L., & Milkovich, G. T. (1989). Effects of market survey rates, job evaluation, and job gender on job pay. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 114-123.
48. Sheppard, B., & Lewicki, R. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161-176.
49. Shirley, G. (1999). Explanations from intelligent systems: Theoretical foundations and implications for practice. MIS Quarterly, 23, 497-329.
50. Sinar, E., Reynolds, D., & Paquet, S. (2003). Nothing but 'Net? Corporate image and Web-based testing. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 150-157.
51. Smither, J. W. Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., Pearlman, K., & Stoffey, R. W. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49-75.
52. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
53. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
54. Tan, Y., & Thoen, W. (2002). Formal aspects of a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems, 33, 233-246.
55. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Timberlake, C. (2001, October 30). Corporate websites increasingly offer chances to apply for open jobs online. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
57. Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30, 165-187.
58. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
59. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
60. Tyler, T. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 333-344.
61. Tyler, T., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of out-come and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
62. Tyler, T., & Lind, E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, p. 115-191). San Diego: Academic Press.
63. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Fundamental research by means of laboratory experiments is essential for a better understanding of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 254-259.
64. Veroff, J. (1977). Process vs. impact of men's and women's achievement motivation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 283-293.
65. Wiechmann, D., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Reactions to computerized testing in selection contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 215-229.
66. Zhou, J., & Martocchio, J. (2001). Chinese and American managers' compensation award decisions: A comparative policy-capturing study. Personnel Psychology, 54, 115-146.