Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature

Organizational Behavior: A Management Challenge

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 159-200

  Colquitt, Jason A ^a   Greenberg, Jerald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85122226115     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (145)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic.
2. Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth. New York: The Free Press.
3. Alexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1, 177-198.
4. Ambrose, M.L., & Hess, R.L., Jr. (2001, September). Individuals responses to fairness: A consideration of management and marketing models. Paper presented at the International Roundtable on Innovations in Organizational Justice Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
5. Ball G.A., Trevino, L.K., & Sims, H.P., Jr. (1993). Justice and organizational punishment: Attitudinal outcomes of disciplinary events. Social Justice Research, 6, 39-67.
6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
7. Bargh, J.A., & Ferguson, M.J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945.
8. Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
9. Bies, R.J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R.Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J.Lewicki, B.H.Sheppard, & M.H.Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
11. Bobocel, D.R., & Holmvall, C.M. (2001). Are interactional justice and procedural justice different? Framing the debate. In S.Gilliland, D.Steiner, & D.Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 85-110). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
12. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M.J., Francesco, A.M., Chen, Z. X., Leung, K., Bierbauer, G., Gomez, C., Kirkman, B.L., & Shapiro, D. (2001). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 300-315.
13. Brockner, J., & Adsit, L. (1986). The moderating impact of sex on the equity-satisfaction relationship: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 585-590.
14. Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In. J.Carroll (Ed.), Advances in applied social psychology: Business settings (pp. 45-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B.M. (1986). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
16. Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B.M., & Martin, C.L. (1995). Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivors' reactions to job layoffs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 59-68.
17. Brockner, J., Wiesenfeld, B.M., Reed, T., Grover, S., & Martin, C. (1993). Interactive effect of job content and context on reactions of layoff survivors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 187-197.
18. Byrne, Z.S., & Cropanzano, R. (2000, April). To which source do I attribute this fairness? Differential effects of multi-foci justice on organizational work behaviors. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
19. Byrne, Z.S., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). The history of organizational justice: The founders speak. In R.Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Vol. 2. From theory to practice (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Cohen, R.L. (1986). Justice: Views from the social sciences. New York: Plenum.
22. Cohen, R.L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In J. Greenberg & R.L.Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 1-41). New York: Academic.
23. Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice; A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
24. Colquitt, J.A., & Chertkoff, J. (2002). Explaining injustice: The interactive effect of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation. Journal of Management 28, 591-610.
25. Colquitt J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O. L.H., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analysis of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
26. Colquitt J.A., Noe, R.A., & Jackson, C.L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences in procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83-109.
27. Conlon, D.E., & Ross, W.H. (1993). The effects of partisan third parties on negotiator behavior and outcome perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 280-290.
28. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M.L. (2001). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R.Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119-151). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z.S., Bobocel, D.R., & Rupp, D.E. (2001a). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
30. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z.S., Bobocel, D.R., & Rupp, D.E. (2001b). Self- enhancement biases, laboratory experiments, George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and the increasingly crowded world of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 260-272.
31. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C.L.Cooper & I T.Roberson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). Chichester, England: Wiley.
32. Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C.A., & Chen, P.Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Organization Managment 27, 324-351.
33. Daly, J.P., & Geyer, P.D. (1994). The role of fairness in implementing large-scale change: Employee evaluations of process and outcome in seven facility relocations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 623-638.
34. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
35. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
36. Folger, R. (1986a). A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J.M.Olson, C.P.Herman, & M.P.Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4, pp. 33-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Folger, R. (1986b). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H.W. Bierhoff, R.L.Cohen, & J.Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
38. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J.C.Masters & W.P.Smith (Eds.), Social comparison Justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives (pp. 183-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In K.Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161-183). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40. Folger, R., & Bies, R.J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79-89.
41. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R.Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K.Rowland & G.Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
44. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy ofManagement Journal, 32, 115-130
45. Forehand, B., & Gilmer, B. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 62, 361-382.
46. Gilliland, S.W. (1993), The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy ofManagementReview, 18, 694-734.
47. Gilliland, S.W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributivejustice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691-701.
48. Gilliland, S.W., Groth, M., Baker, R.C., & Dew, A.F. (2001). Improving applicants' reactions to rejection letters: An application of fairness theory. Personnel Psychology, 54, 669-703.
49. Gordon, M.E., & Fryxell, G.E. (1989). Voluntariness of association as a moderator of the importance of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 993-1009.
50. Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247
51. Greenberg, J. (1979). Protestant ethic endorsement and the fairness of equity inputs. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 81-90.
52. Greenberg, J. (1986a). The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations. In H.W.Bierhoff, R.L.Cohen, & J.Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 337-351). New York: Plenum.
53. Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? In R.J.Lewicki, B.H.Sheppard, & M.H.Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 25-41). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
54. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
55. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
56. Greenberg, J. (1993a). The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice: You've come a long way, maybe. Social Justice Research, 6, 135-148.
57. Greenberg, J. (1993b). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R.Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
59. Greenberg, J. (1996). The quest for justice on the job. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Greenberg, J. (1998). The cognitive geometry of employee theft: Negotiating "the line" between taking and theft. In R.W.Griffin, A. O'Leary-Keily, & J.Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Vol. 2. Nonviolent behaviors in organizations (pp. 147-193). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
61. Greenberg, J. (2000). Promote procedural justice to enhance acceptance of work outcomes. In E.A.Locke (Ed.), A handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 191-195), Oxford, England: Blackwell.
62. Greenberg, J. (in press). Who stole what, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
63. Greenberg, J., & Alge, B. (1998). Aggressive reactions to workplace injustice. In R.W. Griffin, A. O'Leary-Kelly, & J.Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Vol. 1. Violent behavior in organizations (pp. 119-145). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64. Greenberg, J., Eskew, D., & Miles, J.A. (1991, August). Adherence to participatory norms as a moderator of the fair process effect: When voice does not enhance procedural justice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami Beach, FL.
65. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P.Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
66. Greenberg, J., & Lind, E.A. (2000). The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application. In C.L.Cooper & E.A.Locke (Eds.), I/O psychology: What we know about theory and practice (pp. 72-108). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
67. Greenberg, J., & McCarty, C. (1990). Comparable worth: A matter of justice. In G.R. Ferris & K.M.Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 8, pp. 265-301). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
68. Grienberger, I.V., Rutte, C.G., & Van Knippenberg, A.F.M. (1997). Influence of social comparisons of outcomes and procedures on fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 913-919.
69. Hagedoorn, M., Buunk, B.P., & Vande Vliert (1998). Opening the black box between justice and reactions to unfavorable outcomes in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 11, 41-57.
70. Holbrook, R.L., & Kulik, C.T. (2001). Customer perceptions of justice in service transactions: The effects of strong and weak ties. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 743-757.
71. Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behaviour: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
72. House, R.J., & Aditya, R.N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal ofManagement, 23, 409-473.
73. Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D., & Miles, E.W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
74. Joy, V.L., & Witt, L.A. (1992). Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice-distributive justice relationship. Group and Organization Management, 17, 297-308.
75. Kanfer, R. (1991). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M.D.Dunnette & L.M.Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
76. Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (1995). Leadership and empowerment: A social exchange perspective. Human Relations, 48, 127-146.
77. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J.M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
78. Kidder, L.H., & Miller, S. (1991). What is "fair" in Japan? In H.Steensma & R. Vermunt (Eds.), Social justice in human relations: Vol. 2. Societal and psychological consequences of justice and injustice (pp. 139-154). New York: Plenum.
79. Kidwell, R.E., & Bennett, N. (1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems: The role of procedural fairness. Group and Organization Management, 19, 203-218.
80. Kim, W.C., & Mauborgne, R.A. (1993). Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals' corporate strategy decisions. Academy ofManagement Journal, 36, 502-526.
81. King, W.C., Jr., Miles, E.W., & Day, D.D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.
82. Konovsky, M.A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
83. Konovsky, M.A., & Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 630-650.
84. Konovsky, M.A., Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1987). Relative effects of procedural and distributive justice on employee attitudes. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 15-24.
85. Korsgaard, M.A., Roberson, L., & Rymph, R.D. (1998). What motivates fairness? The role of subordinate assertive behavior on managers' interactional fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 731-744.
86. Kouzes, J.M., Posner, B.Z., & Peters, T. (1996). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Leung, K., & Tong, K.K. (2001, September). Toward a normative model of justice. Paper presented at the International Roundtable on Innovations in Organizational Justice Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
88. Leventhal, G.S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L.Berkowitz & W.Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic.
89. Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K.Gergen, M.Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
90. Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W.R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G.Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
91. Lind, E.A. (2001a). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
92. Lind, E.A. (2001b). Thinking critically about justice judgments. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 220-226.
93. Lind, E.A., Greenberg, J., Scott, K.S., & Welchans, D. (2000). The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful termination claims. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 557-590.
94. Lind, E.A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions for fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 189-210.
95. Lind, E.A., Kulik, C., Ambrose, M., & de Vera Park, M. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 224-251.
96. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
97. Lind, E.A., Tyler, T.R., & Huo, Y.J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variation in antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
98. Major, B., & Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg & R.L.Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 43-76). New York: Academic.
99. Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
100. Masterson, S.S., Bartol, K.M., & Moye, N. (2000, April). Interactional and procedural justice: Type versus source of fairness. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
101. Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M., & Taylor, M.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy ofManagement Journal, 43, 738-748.
102. McFarlin, D.B., Frone, M., Major, D.B., & Konar, E. (1989). Predicting career-entry pay expectations: The role of gender-based comparisons. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 331-340.
103. McFarlin, D.B., & Sweeney, P.D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
104. Mikula, G. (1993). Exploring the experience of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4, 223-244.
105. Moorman, R.H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
106. Mossholder, K.W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C.L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131-141.
107. Naumann, S.E., & Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881-889
108. Niehoff, B.P., & Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
109. Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A.J., & Tamkins, M.M. (in press). Organizational culture and climate. In W.C.Borman, D.R.Ilgen, & R.J.Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.
110. Parker, C.P., Baltes, B.B., & Christiansen, N.D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 376-389.
111. Porter, L.W., & Lawler, E.E., III. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
112. Quinones, M.A. (1995). Pretraining context effects: Training assignment as feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 226-238.
113. Reichers, A.E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: Life cycles of constructs. In B.Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
114. Scandura, T.A. (1997). Mentoring and organizational justice: An empirical investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 58-69.
115. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M.L., & Cropanzano, R.S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 294-304.
116. Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI). Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 3-20.
117. Skarlicki, D.P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
118. Skarlicki, D.P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal 42, 100-108.
119. Skarlicki, D.P., & Latham, G.P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 161-169.
120. Skarlicki, D.R., & Latham, G.P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology, 50, 617-633.
121. Steiner, D.D. (2001). Cultural influences on perceptions of distributive and procedural justice. In S.Gilliland, D.Steiner, & D.Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 111-138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
122. Sweeney, P.D., & McFarlin, D.B. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40.
123. Sweeney, P.D., & McFarlin, D.B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
124. Sweeney, P.D., McFarlin, D.B., & Cotton, J.L. (1991). Locus of control as a moderator of the relationship between perceived influence and procedural justice. Human Relations, 44, 333-342.
125. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
126. Tyler, T.R. (1986). When does procedural justice matter in organizational settings? In R. J.Lewicki, B.H.Sheppard, & M.H.Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 7-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
127. Tyler, T.R. (1990). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
128. Tyler, T.R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. In B.M.Staw & R.Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 201-246). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
129. Tyler, T., & Bies, R.J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J.Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings (pp. 77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
130. Tyler, T.R., & Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
131. Tyler, T.R., & Lind, E.A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic.
132. Van den Bos, K. (2001a). Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D.Steiner, & D.Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 63-84). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
133. Van den Bos, K. (2001b). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, 931-941.
134. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046.
135. Van den Bos, K., Lind, E.A., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In R.Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Vol. 2. From theory to practice (pp. 49-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
136. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H.A.M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 95-104.
137. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H.A.M., & Lind, E.A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.
138. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H.A.M., Lind, E.A., & Vermunt, R. (1998). Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1493-1503.
139. Van Prooijen, J.W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H.A.M. (2001, September). A group dynamics focus model ofprocedural justice. Presented at the International Roundtable on Organizational Justice, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
140. Vecchio, R.P. Griffeth, R.W., & Horn, P.W. (1986). The predictive utility of the vertical dyad linkage approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 617-625.
141. Vroom, H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
142. Welbourne, T.M., Balkin, D.B., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (1995). Gainsharing and mutual monitoring: A combined agency-organizational justice interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 881-899.
143. Whetten, D.A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490-95.
144. White, M.M., Tarvsky, J.A., & Baik, K. (1995). Linking culture and perceptions of justice: A comparison of students in Virginia and South Korea. Psychological Reports, 77, 1103-1112.
145. Yukl, G., & Van Fleet, D.D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M.D.Dunnette & L.M.Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 147-197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.