Fundamental research by means of laboratory experiments is essential for a better understanding of organizational justice

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 254-259

  Van den Bos, Kees ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035314998     PISSN: 00018791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1797     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (in press). How do I know that's fair? A categorization approach to fairness judgments. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki Eds., Research in social issues in management (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT, Information Age Publishing.
2. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P.1996. Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice: The role of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler Eds., Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390-413). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
3. Cronbach L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist. 12:1957;671-684.
4. Cropanzano R., Byrne Z. S., Bobocel D. R., Rupp D. E. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 58:2001;164-209.
5. Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J.1997. Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson Eds., International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317-372). New York, Wiley.
6. Folger, R. 1984, Preface. In, R. Folger, (Ed.), The sense of injustice: Social psychological perspectives, (pp, ix, - x, ), New York, Plenum Press.
7. Folger R., Cropanzano R. Organizational justice and human resource management. 1998.
8. Greenberg J. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management. 16:1990;399-432.
9. Greenberg J. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 54:1993;81-103.
10. Lind E. A. Experimental studies of procedural justice. 1994.
11. Lind E. A. Social conflict and social justice: Lessons from the social psychology of justice judgments. 1995.
12. Tyler T. R. Why do people obey the law? Procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. 1990.
13. Tyler T. R. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67:1994;850-863.
14. Tyler T. R. The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1:1997;323-345.
15. Tyler T. R., DeGoey P., Smith H. J. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70:1996;913-930.
16. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A.1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna Ed., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
17. Van den Bos K. Procedural justice and conflict. 1996.
18. Van den Bos K., Van Schie E. C. M. Procedural and distributive justice in child day care centers. 1998.
19. Van den Bos K., Wilke H. A. M., Lind E. A. When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75:1998;1449-1458.