Incorporation of gap characters and lineage-specific regions into phylogenetic analyses of gene families from divergent clades: An example from the kinesin superfamily across eukaryotes

Cladistics

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 372-384

  Simmons, Mark P ^a   Richardson, Dale ^a   Reddy, Anireddy S N ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLADISTICS; EUKARYOTE; GENE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 43549084185     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00183.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Bailey, C.D., Koch, M.A., Mayer, M., Mummenhoff, K., O'Kane, S.L., Warwick, S.I., Windham, M.D., Al-Shehbaz, I.A., 2006. Toward a global phylogeny of the Brassicaceae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 2142 2160.
2. Baldwin, B.G., Markos, S., 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDNA: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10, 449 463.
3. Bapteste, E., Philippe, H., 2002. The potential value of indels as phylogenetic markers: position of trichomonads as a case study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 972 977.
4. Barriel, V., 1994. Molecular phylogenies and how to code insertion/deletion events. Life Sci. 317, 693 701.
5. Baum, D.A., Sytsma, K.J., Hoch, P.C., 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 19, 363 388.
6. Bena, G., Prosper, J.-M., Lejeune, B., Olivieri, I., 1998. Evolution of annual species of the genus Medicago: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9, 552 559.
7. Bingle, C.D., Leclair, E.E., Havard, S., Bingle, L., Gillingham, P., Craven, C.J., 2004. Phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of the PLUNC gene family. Protein Sci. 13, 422 430.
8. Blouin, M.S., Yowell, C.A., Courtney, C.H., Dame, J.B., 1998. Substitution bias, rapid saturation, and the use of mtDNA for nematode systematics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1719 1727.
9. Castresana, J., 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540 552.
10. Cummings, M.P., Handley, S.A., Myers, D.S., Reed, D.L., Rokas, A., Winka, K., 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 52, 477 487.
11. van Dijk, M.A.M., Paradis, E., Catzeflis, F., de Jong, W.W., 1999. The virtues of gaps: Xenarthran (Edentate) monophyly supported by a unique deletion in aA-crystallin. Syst. Biol. 48, 94 106.
12. Ding, Y., Ortelli, F., Rossiter, L.C., Hemingway, J., Ranson, H., 2003. The Anopheles gambiae glutathione transferase supergene family: annotation, phylogeny and expression profiles. BMC Genomics 4, 35.
13. Edgar, R.C., 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1792 1797.
14. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., Kluge, A.G., 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99 124.
15. Felsenstein, J., 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401 410.
16. Felsenstein, J., 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368 376.
17. Feng, D.-F., Doolittle, R.F., 1987. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J. Mol. Evol. 25, 351 360.
18. Freudenstein, J.V., Chase, M.W., 2001. Analysis of mitochondrial nad1b-c intron sequences in Orchidaceae: Utility and coding of length-change characters. Syst. Bot. 26, 643 657.
19. Giribet, G., Wheeler, W.C., 1999. On gaps. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 132 143.
20. Gribaldo, S., Philippe, H., 2002. Ancient phylogenetic relationships. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61, 391 408.
21. Gupta, R.S., 2001. The branching order and phylogenetic placement of species from completed bacterial genomes, based on conserved indels found in various proteins. Int. Microbiol. 4, 187 202.
22. van Ham, R.C.H.J., Hart, H., Mes, T.H.M., Sandbrink, J.M., 1994. Molecular evolution of noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome in the Crassulaceae and related species. Curr. Genet. 25, 558 566.
23. Hedges, S.B., 1992. The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap p value in phylogenetic studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 366 369.
24. Hendy, M.D., Penny, D., 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38, 297 309.
25. Hillis, D.M., 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383, 130 131.
26. Hillis, D.M., 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47, 3 8.
27. Houzelstein, D., Gonçalves, I.R., Fadden, A.J., Sidhu, S.S., Cooper, D.N.W., Drickamer, K., Leffler, H., Poirier, F., 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of the vertebrate galectin family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1177 1187.
28. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754 755.
29. Ingvarsson, P.K., Ribstein, S., Taylor, D.R., 2003. Molecular evolution of insertions and deletions in the chloroplast genome of Silene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1737 1740.
30. de Jong, W.W., van Dijk, M.A.M., Poux, C., Kappé, G., van Rheede, T., Madsen, O., 2003. Indels in protein-coding sequences of Euarchontoglires constrain the rooting of the eutherian tree. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 328 340.
31. Källersjö, M., Albert, V.A., Farris, J.S., 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15, 91 93.
32. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K., Miyata, T., 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059 3066.
33. Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H., Miyata, T., 2005. MAFFT, Version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 511 518.
34. Kawakita, A., Sota, T., Ascher, J.S., Ito, M., Tanaka, H., Kato, M., 2003. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of alignment gaps within intron sequences of three nuclear genes in bumble bees (Bombus). Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 87 92.
35. Keeling, P.J., Palmer, J.D., 2001. Lateral transfer at the gene and subgenic levels in the evolution of eukaryotic enolase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10745 10750.
36. Kluge, A.G., 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis for relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38, 7 25.
37. Lake, J.A., 1991. The order of sequence alignment can bias the selection of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 378 385.
38. Lassmann, T., Sonnhammer, E.L.L., 2002. Quality assessment of multiple alignment programs. FEBS Lett. 529, 126 130.
39. Lecointre, G., Deleporte, P., 2005. Total evidence requires exclusion of phylogenetically misleading data. Zool. Scr. 34, 101 117.
40. Lecointre, G., Philippe, H., Van Le, H.L., Le Guyader, H., 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2, 205 224.
41. Lewis, L.A., Mishler, B.D., Vilgalys, R., 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticeae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 377 393.
42. Libertini, E., Li, Y., McQueen-Mason, S.J., 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant endo-B-1,4-glucanase gene family. J. Mol. Evol. 58, 506 515.
43. Lloyd, D.G., Calder, V.L., 1991. Multi-residue gaps, a class of molecular characters with exceptional reliability for phylogenetic analyses. J. Evol. Biol. 4, 9 21.
44. Lockhart, P.J., Howe, C.J., Bryant, D.A., Beanland, T.J., Larkum, A.W.D., 1992a. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 34, 153 162.
45. Lockhart, P.J., Penny, D., Hendy, M.D., Howe, C.J., Beanland, T.J., Larkum, A.W.D., 1992b. Controversy on chloroplast origins. FEBS Lett. 301, 127 131.
46. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P., 2001. Macclade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.03. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
47. Mazet, F., You, J.-K., Liberles, D.A., Holland, L.Z., Shimeld, S.M., 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the fox (forkhead) gene family in the Bilateria. Gene 316, 79 89.
48. Meyer, A., 1994. Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 278 280.
49. Morgenstern, B., 1999. DIALIGN 2: improvement of the segment-to-segment approach to multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 15, 211 218.
50. Morgenstern, B., Frech, K., Dress, A., Werner, T., 1998. DIALIGN: finding local similarities by multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 14, 290 294.
51. Morrison, D.A., Ellis, J.T., 1997. Effects of nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of Apicomplexa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 428 441.
52. Müller, K., 2005. Seqstate - primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Appl. Bioinform. 4, 65 69.
53. Müller, K., 2006. Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38, 667 676.
54. Nixon, K.C., Carpenter, J.M., 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221 242.
55. Nixon, K.C., Wheeler, Q.D., 1991. Extinction and the origin of species. In : Wheeler, Q.D., Novacek, M. (Eds Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 119 143.
56. Notredame, C., Higgins, D.G., Heringa, J., 2000. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 302, 205 217.
57. Philippe, H., Lecointre, G., Lê, H.L.V., Le Guyader, H., 1996. A critical study of homoplasy in molecular data with the use of a morphologically based cladogram, and its consequences for character weighting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 1174 1186.
58. Philippe, H., Snell, E.A., Bapteste, E., Lopez, P., Holland, P.W.H., Casane, D., 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1740 1752.
59. Pons, J., Vogler, A.P., 2006. Size, frequency, and phylogenetic signal of multiple-residue indels in sequence alignment of introns. Cladistics 22, 144 156.
60. Prud'homme, B., Lartillot, N., Balavoine, G., Adoutte, A., Vervoort, M., 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of the Wnt gene family: insights from Lophotrochozoan members. Curr. Biol. 12, 1395 1400.
61. Reddy, A.S.N., 2005. Molecular motors in plant cells. In : Meyer, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, Vol. 8. Wiley-VCH Publishers, Weinheim, pp. 461 494.
62. Redelings, B.D., Suchard, M.A., 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54, 401 418.
63. Richards, T.A., Cavalier-Smith, T., 2005. Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotes. Nature 436, 1113 1118.
64. Richardson, D., Simmons, M.P., Reddy, A.S.N., 2006. Comprehensive comparative analysis of kinesins in photosynthetic eukaryotes. BMC Genomics 7, 18.
65. Robinson, D.F., Foulds, L.R., 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci. 53, 131 147.
66. Rokas, A., Holland, P.W.H., 2000. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 454 459.
67. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., van der Mark, P., 2005. MrBayes 3.1 Manual. http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/manual.php/ Downloaded 5/17/2005.
68. Siddall, M.E., 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: long-branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris Zone. Cladistics 14, 209 220.
69. Simmons, M.P., 2004. Independence of alignment and tree search. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 874 879.
70. Simmons, M.P., Freudenstein, J.V., 2003. The effects of increasing genetic distance on alignment of, and tree construction from, rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26, 444 451.
71. Simmons, M.P., Miya, M., 2004. Efficiently resolving the basal clades of a phylogenetic tree using Bayesian and parsimony approaches: a case study using mitogenomic data from 100 higher teleost fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 351 362.
72. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369 381.
73. Simmons, M.P., Webb, C.T., 2006. Quantification of the success of phylogenetic inference in simulations. Cladistics 22, 249 305.
74. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., Carr, T.G., 2001. Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 50, 454 462.
75. Simmons, M.P., Pickett, K.M., Miya, M., 2004. How meaningful are Bayesian posterior probabilities? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 188 199.
76. Simmons, M.P., Müller, K., Norton, A.P., 2007. The relative performance of indel-coding methods in simulations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 44, 724 740.
77. Stoye, J., 1998. Multiple sequence alignment with the divide-and-conquer method. Gene 211, GC45 GC56.
78. Subramanian, A.R., Weyer-Menkhoff, J., Kaufmann, M., Morgenstern, B., 2005. DIALIGN-T: an improved algorithm for segment-based multiple sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 66.
79. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G.V., Nei, M., 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16138 16143.
80. Swofford, D.L., 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
81. Swofford, D.L., Waddell, P.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Foster, P.G., Lewis, P.O., Rogers, J.S., 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50, 525 539.
82. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673 4680.
83. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4876 4882.
84. Thompson, J.D., Plewniak, F., Poch, O., 1999. A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2682 2690.
85. Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H., 1992. Freeing phylogenies from artifacts of alignment. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 1148 1162.
86. Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H., Felsenstein, J., 1991. An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 33, 114 124.
87. Tönges, U., Perry, S.W., Stoye, J., Dress, A.W.M., 1996. A general method for fast multiple sequence alignment. Gene 172, GC33 GC41.
88. Tuffley, C., Steel, M., 1997. Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution. B. Math. Biol. 59, 581 607.
89. Van Walle, I., Lasters, I., Wyns, L., 2004. Align-m - a new algorithm for multiple alignment of highly divergent sequences. Bioinformatics 20, 1428 1435.
90. Wenzel, J.W., Siddall, M.E., 1999. Noise. Cladistics 15, 51 64.
91. Wheeler, W.C., 1995. Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data. Syst. Biol. 44, 321 331.
92. Wheeler, W., 1996. Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12, 1 10.
93. Wheeler, W., Gladstein, D., De Laet, J., 2003. POY, Version 3.0.11. New York, Distributed by the authors.
94. Wiens, J.J., 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47, 625 640.
95. Wiens, J.J., 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52, 528 538.
96. Yang, Z., 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47, 125 133.
97. Yang, Z., Rannala, B., 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 717 724.