Evolution of Annual Species of the GenusMedicago: A Molecular Phylogenetic Approach

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 552-559

  Bena, Gilles ^a,b,c   Prosperi, Jean Marie ^b   Lejeune, Bernard ^c   Olivieri, Isabelle ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c INSTITUTE OF PLANT SCIENCES PARIS SACLAY IPS2   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ALFALFA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; KARYOTYPING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

CHROMOSOME DELETION; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; KARYOTYPING; MEDICAGO SATIVA; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 0032088444     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0493     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ali S. I. Typification of the genusMedicago. Taxon. 17:1968;540-541.
2. Baldwin B. G. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from theCompositae. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 1:1992;3-16.
3. Baldwin B. G., Sanderson M. J., Porter J. M., Wojciechowski M. F., Campbell C. S., Donoghue M. J. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomas DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82:1995;247-277.
4. Bauchan G. R., Elgin J. H. A new chromosome number for the genusMedicago. Crop Sci. 24:1984;193-195.
5. Bena, G. Jubier, M. F. Olivieri, I. Lejeune, B. Ribosomal external and internal transcribed spacers: Combined use in the phylogenetic analysis of Medicago (Leguminosae), J. Mol. Evol.
6. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
7. Brummer E. C., Bouton J. H., Kochert G. Analysis of annualMedicago. Genome. 38:1995;362-367.
8. Damerval C. Comparaison de six espèces de luzernes annuelles à l'aide de caractères biométriques et enzymatiques. Agronomie. 3:1983;971-982.
9. Desfeux C., Maurice S., Henry J.-P., Lejeune B., Gouyon P.-H. The evolution of reproductive system in the genusSilene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 263:1996;409-414.
10. Doyle J. J. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:1992;144-163.
11. Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:1987;11-15.
12. Farris J. S. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics. 5:1989;417-419.
13. Farris J. S., Källersjö M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1995;315-319.
14. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). 1994;University of WashingtonDepartment of Genetics, Seattle.
15. Gillespie D. J., McComb J. A. Morphology and distribution of species in theMedicago murex. Can. J. Bot. 69:1991;2655-2662.
16. Heyn C. C. The typification ofMedicago. Taxon. 18:1969;667-669.
17. Hillis D. M. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNA sequences. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
18. Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83:1992;189-195.
19. Jorgensen R. A., Cluster P. D. Modes and tempos in the evolution of nuclear ribosomal DNA: New characters for evolutionary studies and new markers for genetic and population studies. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75:1988;1238-1247.
20. Kim K.-J., Jansen R. K. Comparisons of phylogenetic hypotheses among diferent data sets in dwarf dandelions (KrigiaAsteraceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 190:1994;157-185.
21. Kluge A. G., Farris J. S. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 42:1969;1-32.
22. Lesins K., Lesins I., Gillies C. B. Medicago murex. Chromosoma. 30:1970;109-122.
23. Lesins K. A., Lesins I. GenusMedicagoLeguminosae. 1979;Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.
24. Mariani A., Pupilli F., Calderini O. Cytological and molecular analysis of annual species of the genusMedicago. Can. J. Bot. 74:1996;299-307.
25. Maddison W., Maddison D. R. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. 1992;Sinauer, Sunderland.
26. Quiros C. F., Bauchan G. R. The genusMedicagoMedicagosativa. Hanson A. Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvment. 1988;93-124 Am. Soc. Agron. Madison.
27. Rieseberg L. H., Soltis D. E. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Plants. 5:1991;65-84.
28. Rose R. J., Schlarbaum S. E., Small E., Johnson L. B. Chloroplast genomic variation and phylogeny inMedicagoIntertextae. Can. J. Bot. 66:1988;1352-1358.
29. Small E. A numerical analysis of major grupings inMedicago. Can. J. Bot. 59:1981;1553-1577.
30. Small E. Generic changes inTrifolieaeTrigonellinae. Stirton C. H. Advances in Legume Systematics: Part 3. 1987;169-181 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
31. Small E. Medicago syriaca. Can. J. Bot. 68:1990;1473-1478.
32. Small E., Jomphe M. A synopsis of the genusMedicagoLeguminosae. Can. J. Bot. 67:1988;3260-3294.
33. Small E., Lefkovitch L. P., Classen D. Character set incongruence inMedicago. Can. J. Bot. 60:1982;2505-2510.
34. Stearns W. T. Notes on Linnaeus's "Genera Plantarum" Carl Linnaeus's Genera Plantarum. 1960;Hafner, New York. p. v-xxiv.
35. Swofford D. L. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. 1993;Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
36. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddel P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis, Moritz, Mable. Molecular Systematics. 1996;Sinauer, Sunderland.
37. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:1994;4673-4680.
38. Valizadeh M., Kang K. K., Kanno A., Kameya T. Analysis of genetic distance among nineMedicago. Breeding Sci. 46:1996;7-10.