Science-specialist student-teachers consider promoting technological design projects: Contributions of multi-media case methods

Research in Science Education

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 163-187

  Bencze, J Larry ^a   Hewitt, Jim ^a   Pedretti, Erminia ^a   Yoon, Susan ^a   Perris, Kirk ^a   van Oostveen, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Case methods; Science teacher education; Technological design

Indexed keywords

EID: 4344663121     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025044626451     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
3. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269-287.
4. Barlex, D. M., Read, N., Fair, D., & Baker, C. (1991). Designing starts here. Seven Oaks, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
5. Bencze, J. L. (2000). Democratic constructivist science education: Enabling egalitarian literacy and self-actualization. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 847-865.
6. Bencze, J. L. (2001). 'Technoscience' education: Empowering citizens against the tyranny of school science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(3), 273-298.
7. Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., & Pedretti, E. (2001). Multi-media case methods in preservice science education: Enabling an apprenticeship for praxis. Research in Science Education, 31(2), 191-209.
8. Benenson, G. (2001). The unrealized potential of everyday technology as a context for learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 730-745.
9. Beyer, L. E. (1998). Schooling for democracy: What kind? In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 245-263). Albany, NY. SUNY Press.
10. Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). Development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(20), 121-139.
11. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
13. Claxton, G. (1991). Educating the inquiring mind: The challenge for school science. London: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
14. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students' perspectives: Towards trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14.
15. Copeland, W. D., & Decker, D. L. (1996). Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(5), 467-481.
16. DfE/WO. (1995). Science in the National Curriculum. London: HMSO.
17. Désautels, J., Fleury, S. C., & Garrison, J. (2002). The enactment of epistemological practice as subversive social action, the provocation of power, and anti-modernism. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 237-269). New York: Peter Lang.
18. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 261-295.
19. Fensham, P. J. (1993). Academic influence on school science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 53-64.
20. Fensham, P. J., & Gardner, P. L. (1994). Technology education and science education: a new relationship? In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V, pp. 159-170). Paris: UNESCO.
21. Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1993). Knowledge acquisition tools based on Personal Construct Psychology. Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(1), 49-85.
22. Gardner, P. L. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329-347.
23. Goodson, I. (2000). Professional knowledge and the teacher's life work. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Møller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 13-25). London: Falmer.
24. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
25. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91.
26. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Naturalistic and rationalistic enquiry. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (pp. 81-85). London: Pergamon Press.
27. Harrington, H. L. (1995). Fostering reasoned decisions: Case-based pedagogy and the professional development of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 203-214.
28. Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Helms, J. V. (1998). Science - and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 811-834.
30. Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 115-135.
31. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
32. Hodson, D. (1999). Science fiction: The continuing misrepresentation of science in the school curriculum. Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 191-216.
33. Jenkins, E. (2000). 'Science for all': Time for a paradigm shift? In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 207-226). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
34. Johnson, S. K., & Stewart, J. (1990). Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: An example from high school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 297-307.
35. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The assessment of performance in design and technology: Final report. London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council.
36. King, K. S. (1998). Designing 21st century educational networlds: Structuring electronic social spaces. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 365-383). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Koballa, T., & Tippins, D. (2000). Cases in middle and secondary science education: The promise and dilemmas. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
38. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Latour, B. (1999). Les politiques de la nature: Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie [Politics of nature: How to bring science into democracy]. Paris: La Découverte.
40. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42. Layton, D. (1988). Revaluing the T in STS. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 367-378.
43. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede a relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916-929.
44. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Lock, R. (1990). Open-ended, problem-solving investigations - what do we mean and how can we use them? School Science Review, 71(256), 63-72.
47. Longbottom, J. E., & Butler, P. H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83(4), 473-492.
48. Louden, W., & Wallace, J. (1996). Quality in the classroom: Learning about teaching through case studies. Rydalmere, NSW: Hodder.
49. Loving, C. C. (1991). The scientific theory profile: A philosophy of science model for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 823-838.
50. Ministry of Education and Training (MoET). (1998). The Ontario curriculum, grades 1-8: Science and technology. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
51. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52. National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
53. Palmquist, B. C., & Finley, F. N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a postbaccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 595-615.
54. Parke, H., & Coble, C. R. (2000). Science education. In D. A. Gabbard (Ed.), Knowledge and power in the global economy: Politics and the rhetoric of school reform (pp. 279-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Petrina, S. (2000). The political ecology of design and technology education: An inquiry into methods. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 207-237.
56. Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and science of constructivist research in teacher thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9, 529-544.
57. Robbins, E. (1997). Why architects draw. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
58. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
59. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790.
60. Schenk, P. (1997). The role of drawing in graphic design and the implications for curriculum planning. Journal of Art and Design Education, 16(1), 73-82.
61. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. Waks, L. J. (2001). Donald Schön's philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 37-51.
63. Wasser, J. D., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research teams. Educational Researcher, 25(5), 5-15.
64. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.
65. West, S. A. (1992). Problem-based learning - a viable addition for secondary school science. School Science Review, 73(265), 47-55.
66. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112-143.
67. Wood, G. H. (1998). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (Eds.), The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (pp. 177-198). Albany, NY. SUNY Press.
68. Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1990). Teacher socialization. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 320-347 . New York: MacMillan.