Learning science through technological design

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 768-790

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035445614     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1031     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
2. Bates, E. (in press). Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. Broman & J.M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
5. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
6. Carlsen, W.W. (1998). Engineering design in the classroom: Is it good science education or is it revolting? Research in Science Education, 28, 51-63.
7. Churchland, P.S., & Sejnowski. T.J. (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
8. Constant, E.W., II. (1989). Cause or consequence: Science, technology, and regulatory change in the oil business in Texas, 1930-1975. Technology and Culture, 30, 426-455.
9. Decety, J., Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
10. Dreyfus, H.L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's "Being and Time," Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
11. Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
12. Fensham, P.J., & Gardner, P.L. (1994). Technology education and science education: A new relationship? In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (pp. 159-170). Paris: UNESCO.
13. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A.L. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. German, P.J. (1994). Testing a model of science process skills acquisition: An interaction with parents' education, preferred language, gender, science attitude, cognitive development, academic ability, and biology knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 749-783.
16. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Hicks, D. (1992). Instrumentation, interdisciplinary knowledge, and research performance in spin glass and superfluid helium three. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 17, 180-204.
18. Holzkamp, K. (1991). Societal and individual life processes. In C.W. Tolman & W. Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp. 50-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Il'enkov, E. (1982). Dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx's Capital (Transl. Sergei Kuzyakov). Moskow: Progress.
20. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
21. Latour, B. (1993). La clef de Berlin et autres lecons d'un amateur de sciences [The key to Berlin and other lessons of a science lover]. Paris: Éditions la Découverte.
22. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin &J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lave, J. (1997). On learning. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 38, 120-135.
24. Layton, D. (1994). Innovations in science and technology education. Paris: UNESCO.
25. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (1999, October). The disclosing of a watershed: Processes of inscription. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, San Diego, CA.
26. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
27. Leont'ev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice Hall.
28. Lynch, M. (1991). Method: Measurement - ordinary and scientific measurement as ethnomethodological phenomena. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 77-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Markard, M. (1984). SUFKI - theoretische Grundlage und methodische Entwicklung [SUFKI - theoretical foundations and methodological developments]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 14, 56-81.
30. Mason, S.F. (1974). Geschichte der Naturwissenschaft [History of science]. Stuttgart: Kröner.
31. McGinn, M.K., & Roth, W.-M. (1998). Assessing students' understandings about levers: Better test instruments are not enough. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 813-832.
32. McGinn, M.K., Roth, W.-M., Boutonné, S., & Woszczyna, C. (1995). The transformation of individual and collective knowledge in elementary science classrooms that are organized as knowledge-building communities. Research in Science Education, 25, 163-189.
33. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
34. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, & science. Chicago: University of Chicago.
35. Roth, W.-M. (1995a). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
36. Roth, W.-M. (1995b). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared (arti)facts and concepts as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
37. Roth, W.-M. (1996a). Art and artifact of children's designing: A situated cognition perspective. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129-166.
38. Roth, W.-M. (1996b). Knowledge diffusion in a Grade 4-5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 179-220.
39. Roth, W.-M. (1996c). Thinking with hands, eyes, and signs: Multimodal science talk in a Grade 6/7 unit on simple machines. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 170-187.
40. Roth, W.-M. (1996d). Unterrichtüber einfache Maschinen im 6. und 7. Schuljahr - geplant und analysiert aus einer sozial-konstruktivistischen Perspektive des Lernens [Learning about simple machines in Grade 6/7: A social-constructivist perspective]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 2, 39-52.
41. Roth, W.-M. (1998a). Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
42. Roth, W.-M. (1998b). Situated cognition and assessment of competence in science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21, 155-169.
43. Roth, W.-M. (1999). Discourse and agency in school science laboratories. Discourse Processes, 28, 27-60.
44. Roth, W.-M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1683-1714.
45. Roth, W.-M. (2001a). Designing as distributed process. Learning and Instruction, 11, 211-239.
46. Roth, W.-M. (2001b). Situating cognition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 27-61.
47. Roth, W.-M. (in press-a). Graphing Henderson Creek: A case of relations in sociomaterial practice. In S. Strauss (Ed.), The development of notational representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Roth, W.-M. (in press-b). From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: Do gestures obtain a bridging function? Pragmatics & Cognition.
49. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999a). Complexities of graphical representations during lectures: A phenomenological approach. Learning and Instruction, 9, 235-255.
50. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Digitising lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29, 627-654.
51. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159-194.
52. Roth, W.-M., & Lawless, D. (in press). Signs, deixis, and the emergence of scientific explanations. Semiotica.
53. Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonné, S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configuration, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 293-347.
54. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K. G., & Ritchie, S.M. (in press). Re/constructing elementary science. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
55. Roth, W.-M., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 103-136.
56. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L.E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882.
57. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
58. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21, 303-339.
59. Streck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365-384.
60. Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM. 38(9), 56-64.
61. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Traweek, S. (1996). Unity, dyads, triads, quads, and complexity: Cultural choreographies of science. Social Text, 46/47, 129-139.
63. Varela, F.J. (1995). The re-enchantment of the concrete: Some biological ingredients for a nouvelle cognitive science. In L. Steels & R. Brooks (Eds.), The artificial life route to artificial intelligence: Building embodied, situated agents (pp. 11-22). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
64. Watson, J. D. (1968). Double Helix. New York: Atheneum Publications.
65. Welzel, M., & Roth, W.-M. (1998). Do interviews really assess students' knowledge? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 25-44.
66. Wilenski, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990 (pp. 193-203). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.