The evolution of animal genitalia: Distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 365-379

  Arnqvist, Göran ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cryptic female choice; Evolutionary radiation; Genetic variation; Intraspecific studies; Phenotypic selection; Reproduction; Reproductive isolation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0030745446     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/bijl.1996.0109     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Alexander RD, Marshall DC, Cooley JR. 1996. Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: Choe, JC, Crespi, BJ, eds. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).
2. Andersson M. 1982. Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 17: 375-393.
3. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Andersson M, Iwasa Y. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 53-58.
5. Arnold ML, Hodges SA. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 67-71.
6. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984a. On the mesurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38: 709-719.
7. Arnold SJ, Wade MJ. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications. Evolution 38: 720-734.
8. Arnqvist G. 1989. Sexual selection in water strider: the function, nature of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56: 344-350.
9. Arnqvist G. 1994. The cost of male secondary sexual traits: developmental constraints during ontogeny in a sexually dimorphic water strider. American Naturalist 144: 119-132.
10. Arnqvist G, Rowe, L. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261: 123-127.
11. Arnqvist G, Rowe L, Krupa J, Sih A. 1996. Assortative mating by size: a meta-analysis of mating patterns in water striders. Evolutionary Ecology (in press).
12. Bakker TCM, Pomiankowski A. 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 129-171.
13. Bao N, Robinsson WH. 1990. Morphology and mating configuration of genitalia of the oriental cockroach, Blatta orientalis L. (Blattodea: Blattidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 92: 416-421.
14. Birkhead TR, Hunter FM. 1990. Mechanisms of sperm competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 48-52.
15. Bookstein FL, 1989. Principal warps: think-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 567-585.
16. Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds). 1987. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Chichester: John Wiley.
18. Breden F, Gerhardt HC, Butlin RK. 1994. Female choice and genetic correlations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 343.
19. Civetta A, Singh RS. 1996. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. Journal of Molecular Evolution (in press).
20. Coyne JA. 1983. Genetic basis of differences in genital morphology among three sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 37: 1101-1118.
21. Coyne JA. 1985. Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relationship to theories of speciation. Genetetic Research 46: 169-192.
22. Coyne JA, Kreitman M. 1986. Evolutionary genetics of two sibling species, Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution 40: 673-691.
23. Crespi BJ, Bookstein FL. 1989. A path-analytic model for the measurement of selection on morphology. Evolution 43: 18-28.
24. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.
25. Dickinson JL. 1996. Multiple mating, sperm competition and cryptic female choice in the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In: Choe, JC, Crespi, BJ, eds. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).
26. Dufour L. 1844. Anatomie générale des Diptères. Annuaire de Science Naturelle 1: 244-264.
27. Eberhard WG. 1985. Sexual selection and the evolution of animal genitalia. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
28. Eberhard WG. 1990. Animal genitalia and female choice. American Scientist 78: 134-141.
29. Eberhard WG. 1991. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biological Review 66: 1-31.
30. Eberhard WG. 1992. Species isolation, genital mechanisms, and the evolution of species-specific genitalia in three species of Macrodactylus beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabeidae, Melolonthinae). Evolution 46: 1774-1783.
31. Eberhard WG. 1993a. Evaluating models of sexual selection: genitalia as a test case. American Naturalist 142: 564-571.
32. Eberhard WG. 1993b. Copulatory courtship and morphology of genitalic coupling in seven Phyllophaga species (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae). Journal of Natural History 27: 683-717.
33. Eberhard WG. 1993c. Copulatory courtship and genital mechanisms of three species of Macrodactylus (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae Melolonthinae). Ethology, Ecology and Evolution. 5: 19-63.
34. Eberhard WG. 1994. Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48: 711-733.
35. Eberhard WG. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Eberhard WG, Cordero C. 1995. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products - a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 493-496.
37. Edwards R. 1993. Entomological and mammalogical perspectives on genital differentiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 406-409.
38. Endler JA. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Falconer DS. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: John Wiley.
40. Goulson D. 1993. Variation in the genitalia of the butterfly Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107:65-71.
41. Grafen A. 1990a. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 473-516.
42. Grafen A. 1990b. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 517-546.
43. Harcourt AH, Harvey PH, Larson SG, Short RV. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293: 55-57.
44. Heming-van Battum KE, Heming BS. 1989. Structure, function and evolutionary significance of the reproductive system in males of Hebrus ruficeps and H. pusillus. Journal of Morphology 202: 281-323.
45. Huber BA. 1993. Genital mechanics and sexual selection in the spider Nesticus cellulanus (Araneae: Nesticidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 2437-2447.
46. Huber BA. 1994. Genital morphology, copulatory mechanism and reproductive biology in Psilochorus simoni (Berland 1911) (Pholcidae; Araneae). Netherlands Journal of Zoology 44: 85-99.
47. Jamieson, BGM. 1987. The ultrastructure and phylogeny of insect spermatozoa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Johnstone RA. 1995. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biological Reviews 70: 1-65.
49. Joly D, Bressac C, Devaux J, Lachaise D. 1991. Sperm length diversity in the Drosophilidae. DIS 70: 104-108.
50. Kirkpatrick M. 1987. The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Chichester: John Wiley, 67-82.
51. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33-38.
52. Kunze L. 1959. Die functionsanatomischen Grundlagen der Kopulation Zwerzikaden, untersuch an Euscelis plebejus (Fall.) und einigen Typhlocybinen. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 6: 322-386.
53. LaMunyon CW, Eisner T. 1993. Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90: 4689-4692.
54. Lande R, Arnold SJ. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
55. Lessels CM, Boag PT. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. The Auk 104: 116-121.
56. Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng Z-B, Laurie CC. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142: 1129-1145.
57. Lloyd JE. 1979. Mating behavior and natural selection. Florida Entomologist 62: 17-34.
58. Mahowald AP, Kambysellis MP. 1980. Oogenesis. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. London: Academic Press, 2nd vol., 141-224.
59. Manly BF. 1985. The statistics of natural selection on animal populations. New York: Chapman and Hall.
60. Mayr E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
61. Møller AP, Pomiankowski A. 1993. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica 89: 267-279.
62. Nur N, Hasson O. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110: 275-297.
63. Otronen M, Siva-Jothy MT. 1991. The effect of post-copulatory male behaviour on ejaculate distribution within the female sperm storage organs of the fly Dryomyza anilis (Dryomyzidae). Behavioural Ecology 5: 51-56.
64. Pitnick S, Markow TA. 1994. Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testis size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. American Naturalist 143: 785-819.
65. Pomiankowski A, Sheridan L. 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 242-244.
66. Pomiankowski A, Møller AP. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 260: 21-29.
67. Porter AH, Shapiro AM. 1990. Lock-and-key hypothesis: lack of mechanical isolation in a butterfly (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) hybrid zone. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83: 107-114.
68. Price T, Schluter D, Heckman NE. 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48: 187-211.
69. Rice, WR. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234
70. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132.
71. Ryan MJ. 1990. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 157-195.
72. Ryan MJ, Rand AS. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44: 305-314.
73. Sakaluk SK, Bangert PJ, Eggert A-K, Gack C, Swanson LV. 1995. The gin trap as a device facilitating coercive mating in sagebrush crickets. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261: 65-71.
74. Scudder GGE. 1971. Comparative morphology of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology 16: 379-406.
75. Sengün A. 1944. Experimente zur sexuell-mechanischen Isolation. Revue de Faculté de Science Istanbul Series B 9: 239-253.
76. Shapiro AM, Porter AH. 1989. The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annual Review of Entomology 34: 231-245.
77. Siva-Jothy MT, Tsubaki Y. 1989. Variation in copulation duration in Mnais pruinosa Selys (Odonata: Calopterygidae). I. Alternative mate-securing tactics and sperm precedence. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 24: 39-45.
78. Smith RL (ed.). 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Orlando: Academic Press.
79. Swaddle JP, Witter MS, Cuthill IC. 1994. The analysis of fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour 48: 986-989.
80. Tadler A. 1993. Genitalia fitting, mating behaviour and possible hybridization in millipedes of the genus Craspedosoma (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida, Craspedosomatidae). Acta Zoologica 74: 215-225.
81. Thornhill R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist 122: 765-788.
82. Thornhill R. 1984. Alternative hypotheses for traits believed to have evolved by sperm competition. In: Smith RL, ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Orlando: Academic Press, 151-178.
83. Waage JK. 1979. Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203: 916-918.
84. Waage JK. 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of Odonate mating systems. In: Smith RL, ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Orlando: Academic Press, 251-290.
85. Walker WF. 1980. Sperm utilization strategies in non-social insects. American Naturalist 115: 780-799.
86. Ward PI. 1993. Females influence sperm storage and use in the yellow dung fly Scatophaga stercoraria (L.). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 313-319.
87. Warner RR, Robertson DR. 1978. Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the Western Carribean. I. The wrasses (Labridae). Smithsonian Contributions in Zoology 254: 1-27.
88. Watson PJ. 1991a. Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female Sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour 41: 343-360.
89. Watson PJ. 1991b. Multiple paternity and first mate sperm precedence in the sierra dome spider, Linyphia litigiosa Keyserling (Linyphiidae). Animal Behaviour 41: 135-148.
90. Watson PJ, Thornhill, R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 21-25.