Visuoperceptual-orthographic reading abilities: A confirmatory factor analysis study

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 421-434

  Mano, Quintino R ^a,b   Osmon, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDENTITY; MALE; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; READING; VISUOPERCEPTUAL ORTHOGRAPHIC READING;

ADULT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 42449129705     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803390701520287     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Ackerman, P. T., & Dykman, R. A. (1993). Phonological processes, confrontational naming, and immediate memory in dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 597-609.
2. Badian, N. A. (1997). Dyslexia and the double deficit hypothesis. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 69-87.
3. Badian, N. A. (1998). A validation of the role of pre-school phonological and orthographic skills in the prediction of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 472-481.
4. Badian, N. A. (2001). Phonological and orthographic processing: Their roles in reading prediction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 179-202.
5. Badian, N. A. (2005). Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 25-52.
6. Berninger, V. W., Abbot, S. P., Greep, K., Reed, E., Hooven, C., & Abbot, R. D. (1995, April). Single, double, and triple deficits in impaired reader at the end of first grade: Individual differences in learner characteristics and response to intervention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN.
7. Blachman, B. A. (1994). What we have learned from longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, and some unanswered questions: A response to Torgesen, Wagner, and Rashotte. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 287-291.
8. Bowers, P. G., & Ishaik, G. (2003). RANs contribution to understanding reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 140-157). New York: Guilford.
9. Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speeds, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading & Writing, 5, 69-85.
10. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
11. Brand, N., Van Bekkum, I., Stumpel, M., & Kroeze, J. H. (1983). Word matching and lexical decisions: A visual half-field study. Brain & Language, 18, 199-211.
12. Buchel, C., Price, C., & Friston, K. (1998). A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway. Nature, 394, 274-277.
13. Buxbaum, L. J., & Coslett, H. B. (1996). Deep dyslexic phenomena in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain and Language, 54, 136-167.
14. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. C. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149-180.
15. Chase, C. (1996). A visual deficit model of developmental dyslexia. In C. Chase, G. Rosen, & G. Sherman (Eds.), Developmental dyslexia: Neural, cognitive, and genetic mechanisms. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
16. Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 22, 466-476.
17. Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A., et al. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291-307.
18. Cohen, L., Jobert, A., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distinct unimodal and multimodal regions for word processing in the left temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 23, 1256-1270.
19. Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning in visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125, 1054-1069.
20. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
21. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
22. Conrad, N. J. (2003). Letter processing in children with naming speed deficits (Doctoral dissertation, McMaster University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64, 2956.
23. Cornelissen, P. L., Richardson, A. J., Mason, A. J., & Stein, J. F. (1995). Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls. Vision Research, 35, 1483-1494.
24. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading & Writing, 14, 549-568.
25. Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., et al. (2004). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15, 307-313.
26. Dehaene, S., Le Clec'h, G., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. NeuroReport, 13, 321-325.
27. Denckla, M. B., & Cutting, L. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29-42.
28. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976a). Naming of object-drawings by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain & Language, 3, 1-15.
29. Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976b). Rapid "automatized" naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471-479.
30. Eden, G. V., VanMeter, J. W., & Rumsey, J. M. (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66-69.
31. Ellis, A. W. (1993). Reading, writing, and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
32. Evans, J. J., Floyd, R. G., & McGrew, K. S. (2002). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review, 31, 246-262.
33. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
34. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301-330). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
35. Golden, C. J. (1975). A group version of the Stroop Color and Word Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 386-388.
36. Goulandris, N. K., & Snowling, M. (1991). Visual memory deficits: A plausible cause of developmental dyslexia? Evidence from a single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 127-154.
37. Grabe, M. (1981). Variable inspection time as an indicator of cognitive reading behaviors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 334-343.
38. Greenwald, M. L., & Berndt, R. S. (1999). Impaired encoding of abstract letter order: Severe alexia in a mildly aphasic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 512-556.
39. Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Macaffer, A., & Andreasen, P. (2003). SeeWord - a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 341-355.
40. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
41. Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Watling, L., Pulvermuller, F., & Rogers, T. T. (2006). [Q:] When would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 818-832.
42. Hultquist, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in reading disabled students and reading age controls: Whole word and subword units (Doctoral dissertation, American International College, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1485A.
43. Hultquist, A. M. (1997). Orthographic processing abilities of adolescents with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 89-114.
44. Irausquin, R. S., Drent, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Benefits of computer-presented speed training for poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 246-265.
45. James, K. H., James, T. W., Jobard, G., Wong, A. N., & Gauthier, I. (2005). Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 452-466.
46. Jimenez, J. E., Ortiz, M. d. R., Rodrigo, M., Valle-Hernandez, I., Ramirez, G., Estevez, A., et al. (2003). Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ-Achievement discrepancy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 34-47.
47. Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: A meta-analysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage, 20, 693-712.
48. Jones, K. M., Torgesen, J. K., & Sexton, M. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt Program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122-128.
49. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2003). LISREL 8.54 [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
50. Keen, A. G., & Lovegrove, W. J. (2000). Transient deficit hypothesis and dyslexia: Examination of whole-parts relationship, retinal sensitivity, and spatial and temporal frequencies. Vision Research, 40, 705-715.
51. King, W. M., Lombardino, L. L., & Ahmed, S. (2005). Accuracy and speed of orthographic processing in persons with developmental dyslexia. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101, 95-107.
52. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
53. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315-334.
54. Livingston, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W., & Galaburda, A. M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceeds of the National Academy of Science, 88, 7943-7947.
55. Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 225-267.
56. Lovett, M. W., Borden, S., DeLuca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer of learning after phonologically- and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
57. Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., & Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334-358.
58. Lundberg, I. (1995). The computer as a tool of remediation in the education of students with reading disabilities: A theory-based approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 89-99.
59. Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159-173.
60. Lyon, G. R., & Cutting, L. E. (1998). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
61. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the basis of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157-195.
62. Mano, Q. R., Osmon, D. C., & Klein, L. (2005, October). Factor analysis of visuoperceptual-orthographic processing: Perceptual processing speed, early perception, latepost perception, and morphological awareness. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, Tampa, FL.
63. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge, Nature, 379, 649-652.
64. McBride-Chang, C., & Manis, F. R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading & Writing, 8, 323-339.
65. McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children's reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 230-239.
66. Nettelbeck, T. (1987). Inspection time and intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 295-346). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67. Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature, 372, 260-263.
68. Olson, R., Wise, B., Connors, F., Rack, J., & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 339-348.
69. Osmon, D. C., Braun, M., & Plambeck, E. (2005). Processing abilities associated with phonologic and orthographic skills in adult learning disability. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 1-11.
70. Osmon, D. C., Smerz, J., Braun, M., & Plambeck, E. (2004, August). Stroop test as a measure of orthographic processing in reading. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention in Honolulu, HI, USA.
71. Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D'Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., et al. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 145-159.
72. Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19, 473-481.
73. Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5205-5215.
74. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 479-492.
75. Roberts, R., & Mather, N. (1997). Orthographic dyslexia: The neglected subtype. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 236-250.
76. Salmelin, R., & Helenius, P. (2004). Functional neuroanatomy of impaired reading in dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 257-272.
77. Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 107-121.
78. Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1972). Misreading: A search for causes. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 293-317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Sinn, H., & Blanken, G. (1999). Visual errors in acquired dyslexia: Evidence for cascaded lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 631-653.
80. Spitsyna, G., Warren, J. E., Scott, S. K., Turkheimer, F. E., & Wise, R. J. (2006). Converging language streams in the human temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 7328-7336.
81. Stanovich, K. E., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114-127.
82. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Cunningham, A. E. (1991). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. Sunseth, K., & Bowers, P. G. (2002). Rapid naming and phonemic awareness: Contributions to reading, spelling, and orthographic knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 401-429.
84. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1998, April). Individual differences in response to intensive reading instruction among 9-11 year old severely disabled readers. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, San Diego, CA.
85. Van der Leij, A. (1994). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on word and pseudoword reading of reading-disabled students. In K. P. Van den Bos, L. S. Siegel, D. J. Bakker, & D. L. Share (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 251-267). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
86. Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1998). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
87. Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Chen, R. (1995). The increasingly inextricable relationship between orthographic and phonological coding in learning to read: Some reservations about current methods of operationalizing orthographic coding. In V. W. Berginger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge. II: Relationships to phonology, reading, and writing (pp. 47-111). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
88. Vickers, D. (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
89. Vickers, D., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, R. J. (1972). Perceptual indices of performance: The measurement of "inspection time" and "noise" in the visual system. Perception, 1, 263-295.
90. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). The development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
91. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1980). Word-form dyslexia. Brain, 103, 99-112.
92. Whyte, J., Curry, C., & Hale, D. (1985). Inspection and intelligence in dyslexic children. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 26, 423-428.
93. Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 3-28.
94. Wolf, M. (Ed.). (2001). Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Timonium, MA: York Press, Inc.
95. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.
96. Wolf, M., & Goodman, G. (1996). Speed Wizards: Computerized games for the teaching of reading fluency [Computer software]. Tufts University and Rochester Institute of Technology.
97. Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, Automaticity, Vocabulary Elaboration, Orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375-386.
98. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery - Third Edition. Chicago: Riverside.