Modeling Team Performance: The Basic Ingredients and Research Needs

Organizational Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 185-228

  Salas, Eduardo ^a   Guthrie, Joseph W ^a   Wilson Donnelly, Katherine A ^a   Priest, Heather A ^a   Burke, C Shawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support systems; Human system integration; Scenario based training; Statistical methods; Team performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549093418     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0471739448.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (151)

1. Anderson, N.R., & West, M.A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 19, 235-258.
2. Argote, L., & McGrath, J.D. (1993). Group processes in organizations: Continuity and change. In C.L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, (Vol. 8), New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Atwood, G.A. (1971). An experimental study of visual imagination and memory. Cognitive Psychology. 2, 290-299.
4. Bandura, A. (1991). The changing icons in personality psychology. In J. H. Cantor (Ed), Psychology at Iowa: Centennial essays (pp. 117-139). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics. 18(3). 19-31.
6. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J. & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(3). 377-391.
7. Bell, B. (2003). On-demand team training with simulated teammates: Some preliminary thoughts on cognitive model reuse. TTG News. 6-8.
8. Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management. 27(1). 14-49.
9. Bolton, A. E., Holness, D. O., Buff, W. L., and Campbell, G. E. (2001). An application of mathematical modeling in training systems: Is it a viable alternative to cognitive modeling? Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation. 497-505.
10. Booher, H.R. (2003). Introduction: Human systems integration. In H.R. Booher (Ed.), Handbook of human system integration (pp. 1-30). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Bowers, C.A., & LaBarba, R.C. (1991). Secondary task assessment of workload: Neuropsychological considerations for applied psychology. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 73, 487-496.
12. Brannick, M.T. & Prince, C. (1997). Overview of team performance measurement. In M.T. Brannick, E. Salas, and C. Prince (Eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory. Methods, and Applications (pp 3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Brody, R.G., Kowalczyk, T.K., & Coulter, J.M. (2003). The effect of a computerized decision aid on the development of knowledge. Journal of Business & Psychology. 18(2), 157-174.
14. Buff, W.L., Bolton, A.E., Campbell, G.E. (2003). Providing an integrated team training capability using synthetic teammates. Paper presented at the ASNE Human Systems Integration Symposium, Tyson's Comer, VA.
15. Burke, C. S. (1999). Examination of the cognitive mechanisms through which team leaders promote effective team processes and adaptive team performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Virginia.
16. Caldwell, D.F., & O'Reilly, C.A. (2003). The determinants of team-based innovations: The role of social influence. Small Group Research. 34(4), 497-517.
17. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., & Salas, E. (1997). Teamwork competencies: The interaction of team member knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In H.F. O'Niel (Ed.), Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment (pp. 151-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Converse, S.A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo, E. Salas, & Associates (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Carron, A.V., Brawley, L.R., & Widmeyer, W.N. (1998). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J.L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sports and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
21. Chatman, J.A., Polzer, J.T., Barsade, S.G., & Neale, M.A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly. 43, 749-780.
22. Cialdini, R., Kallgren, C., & Reno, R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 24. 201-234.
23. Cohen, S. G. and Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management. 23(3): 239-290.
24. Cohen, S. & Weinstein, N. (1981). Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health. Journal of Social Issues. 37(1). 36-70.
25. Collyer, S.C., Malecki, G.S. (1998). Tactical decision making under Stress: history and overview. In: Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. (Eds.), Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
26. Coovert, M.D., & McNelis, K. (1992). Team decision making and performance: A review and proposed modeling approach employing Petri nets. In R.W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (p. 247-280). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
27. Cordery, J.L., Mueller, W.S., & Smith, L.M. (1991). Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy of Management Journal. 34. 464-476.
28. Cox, T.H., Lobel, S.A., & McLeod, P.L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal. 34(4). 827-847.
29. Curral, L.A., Forrester, R.H., Dawson, J.F., & West, M.A. (2001). It's what you do and the way you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. Europe Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 10(2), 187-204.
30. Devine, D.J. (2002). A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics. 6(4), 291-310.
31. Domenech, I., & Messons, J.U. (1975). Introduction to estimation theory and decision theory in statistics. Anuario de Psicologia. 12. 65-95.
32. Dorsey, D.W., & Coovert, M.D. (2003). Mathematical modeling of decisionmaking: A soft and fuzzy approach to capturing hard decisions. Human Factors. 45(1). 117-135.
33. Dreyfus, S.E. (1957). Computational aspects of dynamic programming. Operations Research. 5, 409-415.
34. Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors. 34. 277-288.
35. Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (Eds.) (1996). Stress and human performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
36. Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics. 7, 297-323.
37. Earley, P.C., & Gibson, C.B. (2002). Multinational work teams: A new perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
38. Eby, L., & Dobbins, G. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 18. 275-295.
39. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 44. 350-383.
40. Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors. 37(1 J. 32-64.
41. Erez, M. and Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford
42. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review. 57, 271-284.
43. Fiore, S. M., Cuevas, H. M., Scielzo, S., & Salas, E. (2002). Training individuals for distributed teams: Problem solving assessment for distributed mission research. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 729-744
44. nd Ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
45. Fridsma DB, Thomsen J. (1998). Representing medical protocols for organizational simulation: An information processing approach. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 4(1). 71-95.
46. Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 29. 499-517.
47. Griepentrog, B. K. & Fleming, P. J. (2003). Shared mental models and team performance: Are you thinking what we're thinking? Symposium presented at the 18th Annual Conference for the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology. Orlando, FL.
48. Guzzo, R.A. & Dickinson, M.W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology. 47. 307-338.
49. Hackman, J.R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 4, 162-187.
50. Hackman, J.R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J.W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
51. Hackman, J.R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
52. Hackman, J.R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 199-267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
53. Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
54. Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
55. Hambrick, D.C., Davison, S.C., Snell, S.A., & Snow, C.C. (1998). When groups consist of multiple nationalities: Towards a new understanding of the implications. Organization Studies. 19. 181-205.
56. Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1988). Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 24, 354-365.
57. Hartigan, J. A. & Wigdor, A. K. (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Washington DC: National Academy Press
58. Heise, D.R. (1992). Affect control theory and impression formation. In E. Borgotta & M. Borgotta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. 1, pp. 12-17). New York: MacMillan.
59. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
60. Hunter, J.E. (1986). Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 29. 340-362.
61. Ilgen, D.R., Shapiro, J., Salas, E., & Weiss, H. (1987). Functions of group goals: Possible generalizations from individuals to groups (Tech. Rep. No. 87-022). Orlando, FL: US Naval Training Systems Center Technical Reports.
62. Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), The Psychology of Groups at Work, (pp. 53-76). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
63. Jackson, J.M., & Williams, K.D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49(4). 937-942.
64. Jacobs, T.O. & Jaques, E. (1987). Leadership in complex systems. In J.A. Zeidner (Ed), Human productivity enhancement: Organizations, personnel and decision making (p. 7-65). Orange, NJ.
65. Janis, I.L. (1989). Crucial decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management. New York: The Free Press
66. Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: The Free Press
67. Kahan, J.P., Webb, N. Shavelson, R.J., & Stolzenberg, R.M. (1985). Individual characteristics in unit performance. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
68. Kallgren, C., Reno, R., & Cialdini, R. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do or do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 26. 1002-1012.
69. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P.L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87. 657-690.
70. Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993), Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65. 681-706.
71. nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.
72. Kendall, D.L., Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Stagl, K. C. (2003). Understanding team adaptability: A conceptual framework. Submitted to Journal of Applied Psychology
73. Kirkman, B.L., & Shapiro, D.L. (2001). The impact of cultural values on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in self-managing work teams: The mediating role of employee resistance. Academy of Management Journal. 44(3). 557-569.
74. Kozlowski, S.W., J., Gully, S.M., Nason, E.R., & Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. E. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing. Personnel Actions, and Development. 240-292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Gully, S.M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. Beyerlein, S. Beyerlein, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 253-292). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76. Kozlowski, S.W.J., Toney, R.J., Mullins, M.E., Weissbein, D.A., Brown, K.G. & Bell, B.S. (2001). Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (Vol. 1, pp. 59-123). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
77. Lawler, E.E., Mohrman, S.A., & Ledford, G.E. (1998). Strategies for high performance organizations: Employee involvement, TOM, and reengineering programs in Fortune 1,000 corporations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
78. Lepine, J.A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(1). 27-39.
79. Lepine, J.A., Hanson, M.A., Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (2000). Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing. In G.R. Ferris & K.M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 19, pp. 53-90). Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
80. Levine, J.M., & Moeland, R.L. (1990). Progress in small-group research. Annual Review of Psychology. 41. 585-634.
81. Likert, R. (1977). The nature of highly effective groups. In J.L. Gray & F.A. Starke (Eds.), Readings in organizational behavior (pp. 100-129). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
82. Loher, B. T., Vancouver, J. B., & Czajka, J. (1994). Preferences and reactions to teams. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Inc., Nashville, TN.
83. Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J. & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85. 971-986.
84. Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E. & Zaccaro, S.J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Management Review. 26. 356-376.
85. McGrath, J.E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
86. McGrath, J.E. (1998). A view of group composition through a group-theories lens. In M. A. Neale, E.A. Mannix, & D.H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 255-272). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
87. McIntyre, R.M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 149-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
88. McShane, S.L., & Von Glinow, M.A. (2000). Organizational behavior. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
89. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L.C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research. 34(6), 651-677.
90. Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R., & Rentsch, J.R (2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods. 3(2), 123-165.
91. Mortensen, M., & Hinds, P. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management. 12(3), 212-238.
92. Naylor, J.C. and Dickinson, T.L. (1969). Task structure, work structure, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 53 (3), 167-177.
93. Nemeth, C.J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review. 93, 23-32.
94. Ong, J., & Ramachandran, S (2003). Intelligent tutoring systems: Using Al to improve training performance and ROI. Retrieved February 10 from, http://www.shai.com/papers.
95. Oser, R.L., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Dwyer, D.J. (1999). Enhancing human performance in technology-rich environments: Guidelines for scenario-based training. In E. Salas (Ed.), Human/technology interaction in complex systems (Vol. 9, 175-202). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
96. Parkinson, S.R., Parks, T.E., & Kroll, N.E. (1971). Visual and auditory short-term memory: Effects of phonemically similar auditory shadow material during the retention interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 87. 274-280.
97. Pew, R.W., & Mavor, A.S. (Eds.). (1998). Modeling human and organizational behavior: Application to military simulations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
98. Pierce, L.G., & Salas, E (2003). Linking human performance principles to design of information systems. In H.R. Booher (Ed.), Handbook of human system integration (pp. 1-30). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
99. Porter, C. O. L. H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J. & Moon, H. (2003). Backing up behaviors in teams: The role of personality and legitimacy of need. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(3). 391-403.
100. Poulton, B.C., & West, M.A. (1999). The determinants of effectiveness in primary health care. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 13. 7-18.
101. th annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 561-565.
102. Prince, C., & Salas, E. (2000). Team situational awareness, errors, and crew resource management: Research integration for training guidance. In M.R. Endsley & D.J. Garland (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 325-347). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
103. Prince, C., Oser, R, Salas, E., & Woodruff, W. (1993). Increasing hits and reducing misses in CRM/LOS scenarios: Guidelines for simulator scenario development. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 3(1), 69-82.
104. Reno, R., Cialdini, R., & Kallgren, C. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64. 104-112.
105. Rentsch, J.R., & Klimoski, R.J. (2001). Why do "great minds' think alike?: Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 22(2). 107-120.
106. Rouse, W.B., & Morris, N.M. (1986). On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin. 100. 349-363.
107. Saavedra, R., Earley, C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78(1), 61-72.
108. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology. 52. 471-499.
109. Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000). The anatomy of team training. In S. Tobias & J.D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training & Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military (pp. 12-335). New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
110. Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S., & Tannenbaum, S.I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R.W. Swezey & E. Salas (eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (3-29). Norwood: Ablex.
111. Salas, E., Driskell, J.E., & Hughes, S. (1996). Introduction: The study of stress and human performance. In J.E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 1-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
112. Salas, Sims, & Burke (2004). Towards a taxonomy of teamwork: The core elements. Manuscript in Preparation.
113. Schneider, S.C. & De Meyer, A. (1991). Interpreting and responding to strategic issues: The impact of national culture. Strategic Management Journal. 12, 307-320
114. Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology. 39, 19-39.
115. Seaman, D.F. (1981). Working effectively with task-oriented groups. New York: McGraw-Hill.
116. Seashore, S.E. (1955). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor MI: Survey Research Institute for Social Science.
117. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
118. Sessa, V.I., & Jackson, S.E. (1995). Diversity in decision making teams: All differences are not created equal. In M.M. Chemers, S. Oskamp, & M.A. Costanzo (Eds.) Diversity in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
119. Shane, S. (1994). The effect of national culture on the choice between licensing and direct foreign investment. Strategic Management Journal. 15. 627-642.
120. Shaw, M.E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1), pp. 111-147). New York: Academic Press.
121. Shaw, M.E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
122. Shaw, M.E. (1976). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
123. Simons, T. Pelled, L.H., & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal. 42. 662-673.
124. Smith, E.M., Ford, J.K., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (1997). Building adaptive expertise: Implications for training design strategies. In M.A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (89-118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
125. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
126. Stogdill, R.M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 8, 376-396.
127. Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Milanovich, D.M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors. 41(1). 61-71.
128. Sundstrom, E.D., De Meuse, K.P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist. 45. 120-133.
129. Sundstrom, E., McIntyre, M., Halfhill, T., & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics. 4, 44-67.
130. Swezey, R.W., Meltzer, A.L., & Salas, E. (1994). Some issues involved in motivating teams. In H. F. O'Neil Jr. and M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 141-169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
131. Swezey, R.W., & Llaneras, R.E. (1997). Models in training and instruction. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 514-577). New York: Wiley.
132. Tannenbaum, S.I., Beard, R.L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influences on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117-153). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
133. Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
134. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review. 96. 506-520.
135. nd Ed, Vol. 4; pp. 103-172). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
136. Vancouver, J. B. & Ilgen, D. R. (1989). The effects of individual difference and the sextype of the task on choosing to work alone or in a group. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74. 927-934.
137. Van de Ven, A., A. Delbecq, R. Koenig, Jr. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review 41. 322-338.
138. Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
139. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40(1), 145-180.
140. Wech, B.A., Mossholder, K.W., Steel, R.P., & Bennett, N. (1998). Does work group cohesiveness affect individual's performance and organizational commitment?: A cross-level examination. Small Group Research. 29(4). 472-494.
141. West, M.A. and Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation at work. In J. L. Farr (Eds.) Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3-13). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
142. West, M., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680-693.
143. nd ed.: pp. 89-1291. New York: John Wiley.
144. Woolf, B.P., Beck, J., & Eliot, C. & Stem, M. (2001). Growth and maturity of intelligent tutoring systems: A status report. In K.D. Forbus & P.J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education: The coming revolution in educational technology (pp. 99-144). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
145. th Annual Conference for the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, ON
146. Zaccaro, S.J., Rittman, A.L., & Marks, M.A. (2001). Team leadership. Leadership Quarterly. 12(4). 451-483.
147. Zachary, W.W., Ryder, J.M., & Hicinbothom, J.H. (1998). Cognitive task analysis and modeling of decision making in complex environments. In J.A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 313-344). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
148. Zachary, W. Santarelli, T., Lyons, D., Bergondy, M. and Johnston, J. (2001). Using a Community of Intelligent Synthetic Entities to Support Operational Team Training. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation. 215-224.
149. Zachary, W.W., Campbell, G.E., Laughery, R., Glenn, F., and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2001). The application of human modeling technology to the design, evaluation, and operation of complex systems. In E. Salas (Eds.), Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, (pp. 201-250). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
150. Zadeh, L. A. (1964). Concept of State in System Theory. In M. D. Mesarovic (Ed.), Views on General Systems Theory (pp. 39-50). New York: Wiley.
151. Zaklad, A., & Zachary, W.W. (1992). Decision support design principles for tactical decision-making in ship-based anti-air warfare (Tech. Rep. No. 20930.9000). Springhouse, PA: CHI System.