Experimental verification of ecological niche modeling in a heterogeneous environment

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2433-2439

  Wright, Jessica W ^a,b   Davies, Kendi F ^a,c   Lau, Jennifer A ^a,d   McCall, Andrew C ^a,e   McKay, John K ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e DENISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological niche modeling; Edaphic variation; GAM models; Local adaptation; Niche differentiation; Serpentine soils; Transplant experiments

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM; NICHE; PLANT; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SOIL; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; ECOSYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SCROPHULARIACEAE; SEEDS; SOIL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

COLLINSIA SPARSIFLORA;

EID: 33845361737     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2433:EVOENM]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ackerly, D. D. 2003. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S165-S184.
2. Chefaoui, R. M., J. Hortal, and J. M. Lobo. 2005. Potential distribution modelling, niche characterization and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biological Conservation 122:327-338.
3. Clausen, J. 1962. Stages in the evolution of plant species. Hafner Publishing, New York, New York, USA.
4. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by natural selection. John Murry, London, UK.
5. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
6. Gower, J. C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857-871.
7. Graham, C. H., S. R. Ron, J. C. Santos, C. J. Schneider, and C. Moritz. 2004. Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in Dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781-1793.
8. Guisan, A., T. C. Edwards, and T. Hastie. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157:89-100.
9. Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmerman. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling 135:147-186.
10. Holt, R. D. 2003. On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5:159-178.
11. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 6:433-447.
12. Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93:145-159.
13. Kearney, M., and W. P. Porter. 2004. Mapping the fundamental niche: physiology, climate, and the distribution of a nocturnal lizard. Ecology 85:3119-3131.
14. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, soils and management problems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
15. Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. American Naturalist 87:331-333.
16. Levin, D. A. 2005. Niche shifts: the primary drive of novelty within angiosperm genera. Systematic Botany 30:9-15.
17. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. American Naturalist 100:637-650.
18. McCullagh, P., and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Second edition. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
19. McKay, J. K., C. Christian, S. Harrison, and K. J. Rice. 2005. How local is local? Practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13:432-440.
20. Peterson, A. T. 2003. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Quarterly Review of Biology 78:419-433.
21. Peterson, A. T., and R. D. Holt. 2003. Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation. Ecology Letters 6:774-782.
22. Peterson, A. T., E. Martínez-Meyer, C. Gonzáles-Salazar, and P. W. Hall. 2004. Modeled climate change effects on distributions of Canadian butterfly species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82:851-858.
23. Peterson, A. T., J. Soberón, and V. Sánchez-Cordero. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265-1267.
24. Peterson, A. T., and D. A. Vieglais. 2001. Predictive species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. BioScience 51:363-371.
25. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz, and R. Brandl. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 268:2383-2389.
26. Pulliam, H. R. 2000. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3:349-361.
27. Stebbins, G. L., and G. F. Hrusa. 1995. The North Coast Range biodiversity arena in central California: a new scenario for research and teaching processes of evolution. Madroño 42:269-294.
28. Turesson, G. 1922. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3:211-350.
29. Wright, J. W., M. L. Stanton, and R. Scherson. 2006. Local adaptation to serpentine and non-serpentine soils in Collinsia sparsiflora. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:1-21.