Divergence in mating signals correlates with ecological variation in the migratory songbird, Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus)

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 3147-3156

  Ruegg, K ^a   Slabbekoorn, H ^b   Clegg, S ^c   Smith, T B ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Birdsong; Catharus ustulatus; Ecological selection; Genetic divergence; Microsatellite; Subspecies

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHEMISTRY; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SONGBIRD; UNITED STATES; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; GENETICS, POPULATION; HAPLOTYPES; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OREGON; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SONGBIRDS; VARIATION (GENETICS); VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

AVES; CATHARUS USTULATUS; PASSERI; PASSERIFORMES;

EID: 33748686579     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03011.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Addinsoft (2005) XLSTAT Pro version 7.5.3 available at http://www.xlstat.com/en/home
2. Baker MC (1982) Vocal dialect recognition and population genetic consequences. Integrative and Comparative Biology, p. 561.
3. Baptista LF, Petrinovich L (1984) Social interaction, sensitive phases and the song template hypothesis in the white-crowned sparrow. Animal Behavior, 32, 172-181.
4. Barbour MG, Billings WD (1988) North American Terrestrial Vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. Beeman K (1996) SIGNAL: A Users Guide. Engineering Design, Belmont, Massachusetts.
6. Castellano S, Balletto E (2002) Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution, 56, 1871-1873.
7. Catchpole CK (1987) Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 94-97.
8. Coyne JA, Orr AH (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
9. Dobson CW, Lemon RE (1977) Markovian versus rhomboidal patterning in the song of Swainson's thrush. Behavior, LXII, 3-4.
10. Ellers J, Slabbekoorn H (2003) Song divergence and male dispersal among bird populations: a spatially explicit model testing the role of vocal learning. Animal Behavior, 65, 671-681.
11. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist, 139, 125-153.
12. Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 415-420.
13. Felsenstein J (2005) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
14. Gibbs HL, Tabak LM, Hobson K (1999) Characterization of microsatellite DNA loci for a Neotropical migrant songbird, the Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Molecular Ecology, 8, 1551-1552.
15. Grant BR, Grant PR (1996) Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution, 50, 2471-2487.
16. Hartl DL (2000) A Primer of Population Genetics, 3rd edition edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
17. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated global terrestrial climate surfaces. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
18. Hijmans RJL, Guarino L, Bussink C, Barrantes I, Rojas E (2004) DIVA-GIS: a geographic information system for the analysis of biodiversity data. Manual available at http://www.gis.org
19. Irwin DE (2000) Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution, 54, 998-1010.
20. Lengagne T, Slater PJ (2002) The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proceedings of the Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 2121-2125.
21. MacDougall-Shackleton EA, MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2001) Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution, 55, 2568-2575.
22. Mack DE (2000) Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). In: The Birds of North America (eds Poole A, Gills F). Birds of North America, Philadelphia.
23. Marler P (1960) Bird songs and mate selection. In: Animal Sounds and Communication (eds Lanyon WE, Tavolga W). American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, DC.
24. Marler P (1987) Sensitive periods and the role of specific and general sensory stimulation in birdsong learning. In: Imprinting and Cortical Plasticity: Comparative Aspects of Sensitive Periods (eds Rauschecker JP, Marler P), pp. 99-135. Wiley, New York.
25. Marten K, D. Q, Marler P. (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization II. Tropical forest habitats. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 2.
26. Marten K, Marler P (1977) Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization I. Temperate habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2.
27. Mayr E (1963) Populations, Species, and Evolution: an Abridgement of Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, London.
28. McGregor PK, Krebs JR (1989) Song learning in adult great tits (Parus major): effect of neighbors. Behavior, 108, 139-159.
29. Miller PJO, Biassoni N, Samuels A, Tayack PL (2000) Whale songs lengthen in response to sonar. Nature, 405, 903.
30. Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. The American Naturalist, 109, 17-34.
31. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292.
32. Nottebohm F, Nottenbohm ME (1978) Relationship between song repertoire and age in the canary, Serinus canrius. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 46, 298-305.
33. Patten MA, Rotenberry JT, Zuk M (2004) Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution, 58, 2144-2155.
34. Payne RB (1981) Song learning and social interaction in indigo buntings. Animal Behavior, 29, 688-697.
35. Payne RB (1996) Song traditions in indigo buntings: origin, improvisation, dispersal, and extinction in cultural evolution. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
36. Podos J (2001) Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature, 409, 185-188.
37. Podos J, Huber S, Taft B (2004) Bird song: the interface of evolution and mechanism. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 35, 55-87.
38. Podos J, Nowicki S (2004) Performance limits on birdsong. In: Nature's Music: The Science of Bird Song (eds Marler P, Slabbekoorn H) Academic New York.
39. Raufaste N, Rousset F (2001) Are partial mantel tests adequate? Evolution, 55, 1703-1705.
40. Rousset F (2002) Partial Mantel tests: reply to Castellano and Balletto. Evolution, 56, 1874-1875.
41. Rousset F, Raymond M (1995) Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics, 140, 1413-1419.
42. Ruegg KC, Hijmans RJ, Moritz C (in press) Climate change and the origin of migratory pathways in the swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Journal of Biogeography.
43. Ruegg KC, Smith TB (2002) Not as the crow flies: a historical explanation for circuitous migration in Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1375-1381.
44. Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist, 126, 87-100.
45. Schluter D (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Schneider DR, Roessli D, Exoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN. In: Software for Population Genetics Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
47. Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 507-533.
48. Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1996) Song and female choice. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (eds Kroodsma DE, Miller EH). Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.
49. Seddon N (2005) Ecological adaptation and species recognition drive vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution, 59, 200-215.
50. Slabbekoorn H (2004) Singing in the wild: the ecology of birdsong. In. Nature's Music - the Science of Birdsong (eds Marler P, Slabbekoorn H) pp. 178-205. Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, California.
51. Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature, 424, 267.
52. Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002a) Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 357, 493-503.
53. Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002b) Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressure on acoustic signals. Evolution, 56, 1849-1858.
54. Soha JA, Nelson DA, Parker PG (2004) Genetic analysis of song dialect populations in Puget Sound white-crowned sparrows. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 636-646.
55. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd ed. WH Freeman, New York.
56. SPSS (1999) SPSS Base 10.0 for Windows User's Guide. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois.
57. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
58. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds (eds Krooddsma DE, Miller EH). Academic Press, New York.
59. Wright TF, Rodriguez AM, Fleischer RC (2005) Vocal dialects, sex-biased dispersal, and microsatellite population structure in the parrot Amazona auropalliata. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1197-1205.
60. Zink RM, Barrowclough GF (1984) Allozymes and song dialects: a reassessment. Evolution, 38, 444-448.