The force needed to move an atom on a surface

Science

Volumn 319, Issue 5866, 2008, Pages 1066-1069

  Ternes, Markus ^a   Lutz, Christopher P ^a   Hirjibehedin, Cyrus F ^a,c   Giessibl, Franz J ^b   Heinrich, Andreas J ^a  

^a IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

FORCE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; METAL; MICROSCOPY; PROBE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; ATOM; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FORCE; MOLECULAR PHYSICS; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 39749147651     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1150288     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D. M. Eigler, E. K. Schweizer, Nature 344, 524 (1990).
2. M. F. Crommie, C. P. Lutz, D. M. Eigler, Science 262, 218 (1993).
3. N. Nilius, T. M. Wallis, W. Ho, Science 297, 1853 (2002).
4. W. Chen, T. Jamneala, V. Madhavan, M. F. Crommie, Phys. Rev. B 60, R8529 (1999).
5. C. F. Hirjibehedin, C. P. Lutz, A. J. Heinrich, Science 312, 1021 (2006).
6. S.-W. Hla, L. Bartels, G. Meyer, K.-H. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2777 (2000).
7. R. Yamachika, M. Grobis, A. Wachowiak, M. F. Crommie, Science 304, 281 (2004).
8. L. Bartels, G. Meyer, K.-H. Rieder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 697 (1997).
9. J. A. Stroscio, R. J. Celotta, Science 306, 242 (2004).
10. N. Oyabu, Y. Sugimoto, M. Abe, Ó. Custance, S. Morita, Nanotechnology 16, S112 (2005).
11. Y. Sugimoto et al., Nat. Mater. 4, 156 (2005).
12. Y. Sugimoto et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106104 (2007).
13. T. R. Albrecht, P. Grütter, D. Horne, D. Rugar, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 668 (1991).
14. F. J. Giessibl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1470 (2000).
15. 0 (fig. S3A). This approach provides a convenient reference for z, which corresponds roughly to the point contact between the tip and the bare surface. This assignment does not necessarily provide direct comparison of the tip heights between the two surfaces explored in this work. The measured conductance is an average over the tip oscillation. For the amplitude A = 30 pm used here, the conductance differs by only ∼11% from the value of a nonoscillating tip at the same mean height.
16. F. J. Giessibl, S. Hembacher, H. Bielefeld, J. Mannhart, Science 289, 422 (2000).
17. J. E. Sader, S. P. Jarvis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1801 (2004).
18. S. Morita, R. Wiesendanger, E. Meyer, Eds. Noncontact Atomic Force Microscopy (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
19. 2 ≈ 5 eV. The cantilever has a mechanical quality factor of Q ≈ 35,000, so that the intrinsic energy loss per oscillation cycle [= 2πE/Q, see (18)] is less than 1 meV. Therefore, we estimate that the dissipative interaction between tip and sample is less than 1% of the typical conservative interaction, so it can be safely neglected; see fig. S5 for more information.
20. H. Hölscher, S. M. Langkat, A. Schwarz, R. Wiesendanger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4428 (2002).
21. The ±10% uncertainty of the cantilever stiffness produces a systematic error. In addition, the uncertainties given in the text include the error due to the finite tip-height increments (±10%) and the effect that different tips (22) produce slightly different results (±5%).
22. Throughout this work, we refer to a changed atomic arrangement at the tip apex (e.g., by touching the tip to the surface) as a different tip.
23. S. R. Bahn, K. W. Jacobsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 266101 (2001).
24. B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, Nature 376, 238 (1995).
25. K.-F. Braun, S.-W. Hla, Phys. Rev. B 75, 033406 (2007).
26. z images for heights above the manipulation threshold were laterally shifted to the location of the binding site nearest the tip. Because dissipation occurred when the atom hopped, comparison of energies between different binding sites might not be valid, but energies within the basin around any one binding site are correct. For more details, see fig. S5.
27. D. V. Tsivlin, V. S. Stepanyuk, W. Hergert, J. Kirschner, Phys. Rev. B 68, 205411 (2003).
28. K. L. Wong, B. V. Rao, G. Pawin, E. Ulin-Avila, L. Bartels, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 201102 (2005).
29. P. Buluschek, thesis, École Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Switzerland (2007).
30. We thank B. J. Melior, G. Zeltzer, and M. Breitschaft for expert technical assistance and A. F. Otte, D. M. Eigler, A. Schwarz, J. Mannhart, and W. Chaisangmongkon for stimulating discussions. We acknowledge financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (to M.T.), the Office of Naval Research (to M.T., C.P.L., and A.J.H.), and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (to F.J.G.).