Dynamin-dependent biogenesis, cell cycle regulation and mitochondrial association of peroxisomes in fission yeast

Traffic

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 353-365

  Jourdain, Isabelle ^a   Sontam, Dharani ^a   Johnson, Chad ^a   Dillies, Clément ^a   Hyams, Jeremy S ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; DsRed SKL; Mitochondria; Oleic acid; Peroxisomal targeting sequence; Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIN; OLEIC ACID;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ARTICLE; BIOGENESIS; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL GROWTH; CELL ORGANELLE; CELL VOLUME; CONTROLLED STUDY; MICROTUBULE; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PEROXISOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; YEAST CELL;

BASE SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, FUNGAL; DYNAMINS; GENES, FUNGAL; MITOCHONDRIA; MOVEMENT; MUTATION; PEROXISOMES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

EID: 38849192600     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00685.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Danpure CJ. Primary hyperoxaluria type 1: AGT mistargeting highlights the fundamental differences between the peroxisomal and mitochondrial protein import pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1776-1784.
2. Tabak HF, Hoepfner D, Zand A, Geuze HJ, Braakman I, Huynen MA. Formation of peroxisomes: Present and past. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1647-1654.
3. Wanders RJ, Waterham HR. Biochemistry of mammalian peroxisomes revisited. Annu Rev Biochem 2006;75:295-332.
4. Schrader M. Shared components of mitochondrial and peroxisomal division. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:531-541.
5. Hoepfner D, Schildknegt D, Braakman I, Philippsen P, Tabak HF. Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell 2005;22:85-95.
6. Schrader M, Fahimi HD. Growth and division of peroxisomes. Int Rev Cytol 2006;255:237-290.
7. Titorenko VI, Mullen RT. Peroxisome biogenesis: The peroxisomal endomembrane system and the role of the ER. J Cell Biol 2006;174:11-17.
8. Koch A, Schneider G, Luers GH, Schrader M. Peroxisome elongation and constriction but not fission can occur independently of dynamin-like protein 1. J Cell Sci 2004;117:3995-4006.
9. Thoms S, Erdmann R. Dynamin-related proteins and Pex11 proteins in peroxisome division and proliferation. FEBS J 2005;272:5169-5181.
10. Yan M, Rayapuram N, Subramani S. The control of peroxisome number and size during division and proliferation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005;17:376-383.
11. Praefcke GJ, McMahon HT. The dynamin superfamily: Universal membrane tubulation and fission molecules? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:133-147.
12. Hoepfner D, van den Berg M, Philippsen P, Tabak HF, Hettema EH. A role for Vps1p, actin, and the Myo2p motor in peroxisome abundance and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 2001;155:979-990.
13. Kuravi K, Nagotu S, Krikken AM, Sjollema K, Deckers M, Erdmann R, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ. Dynamin-related proteins Vps1p and Dnm1p control peroxisome abundance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 2006;119:3994-4001.
14. Vizeacoumar FJ, Vreden WN, Fagarasanu M, Eitzen GA, Aitchison JD, Rachubinski RA. The dynamin-like protein Vps1p of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae associates with peroxisomes in a Pex19p-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 2006;281:12817-12823.
15. Li X, Gould SJ. The dynamin-like GTPase DLP1 is essential for peroxisome division and is recruited to peroxisomes in part by PEX11. J Biol Chem 2003;278:17012-17020.
16. Mano S, Nakamori C, Kondo M, Hayashi M, Nishimura M. An Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein, DRP3A, controls both peroxisomal and mitochondrial division. Plant J 2004;38:487-498.
17. Otsuga D, Keegan BR, Brisch E, Thatcher JW, Hermann GJ, Bleazard W, Shaw JM. The dynamin-related GTPase, Dnm1p, controls mitochondrial morphology in yeast. J Cell Biol 1998;143:333-349.
18. Bleazard W, McCaffery JM, King EJ, Bale S, Mozdy A, Tieu Q, Nunnari J, Shaw JM. The dynamin-related GTPase Dnm1 regulates mitochondrial fission in yeast. Nat Cell Biol 1999;1:298-304.
19. Mozdy AD, McCaffery JM, Shaw JM. Dnm1p GTPase-mediated mitochondrial fission is a multi-step process requiring the novel integral membrane component Fis1p. J Cell Biol 2000;151:367-380.
20. Tieu Q, Nunnari J. Mdv1p is a WD repeat protein that interacts with the dynamin-related GTPase, Dnm1p, to trigger mitochondrial division. J Cell Biol 2000;151:353-366.
21. Cerveny KL, Jensen RE. The WD-repeats of Net2p interact with Dnm1p and Fis1p to regulate division of mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:4126-4139.
22. Bhar D, Karren MA, Babst M, Shaw JM. Dimeric Dnm1-G385D interacts with Mdv1 on mitochondria and can be stimulated to assemble into fission complexes containing Mdv1 and Fis1. J Biol Chem 2006;281:17312-17320.
23. Jakobs S, Martini N, Schauss AC, Egner A, Westermann B, Hell SW. Spatial and temporal dynamics of budding yeast mitochondria lacking the division component Fis1p. J Cell Sci 2003;116:2005-2014.
24. Schauss AC, Bewersdorf J, Jakobs S. Fis1p and Caf4p, but not Mdv1p, determine the polar localization of Dnm1p clusters on the mitochondrial surface. J Cell Sci 2006;119:3098-3106.
25. Koch A, Yoon Y, Bonekamp NA, McNiven MA, Schrader M. A role for Fis1 in both mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:5077-5086.
26. Kobayashi S, Tanaka A, Fujiki Y. Fis1, DLP1, and Pex11p coordinately regulate peroxisome morphogenesis. Exp Cell Res 2007;313:1675-1686.
27. Jedd G, Chua NH. Visualization of peroxisomes in living plant cells reveals acto-myosin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming and peroxisome budding. Plant Cell Physiol 2002;43:384-392.
28. Mathur J, Mahtur N, Hulskamp M. Simultaneous visualization of peroxisomes and cytoskeletal elements reveals actin and not microtubule-based peroxisome motility in plants. Plant Physiol 2002;128:1031-1045.
29. Rapp S, Saffrich R, Anton M, Jakle U, Ansorge W, Gorgas K, Just WW. Microtubule-based peroxisome movement. J Cell Sci 1996;109:837-849.
30. Wiemer EA, Wenzel T, Deerinck TJ, Ellisman MH, Subramani S. Visualization of the peroxisomal compartment in living mammalian cells: dynamic behavior and association with microtubules. J Cell Biol 1997;136:71-80.
31. Yaffe MP, Harata D, Verde F, Eddison M, Toda T, Nurse P. Microtubules mediate mitochondrial distribution in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:11664-11668.
32. Guillou E, Bousquet C, Daloyau M, Emorine LJ, Belenguer P. Msp1p is an intermembrane space dynamin-related protein that mediates mitochondrial fusion in a Dnm1p-dependent manner in S. pombe. FEBS Lett 2005;579:1109-1116.
33. Kiel JAKW, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ. PEX genes in fungal genomes: common, rare or redundant? Traffic 2006;7:1291-1303.
34. Monosov EZ, Wenzel TJ, Luers GH, Heyman JA, Subramani S. Labeling of peroxisomes with green fluorescent protein in living P. pastoris cells. J Histochem Cytochem 1996;44:581-589.
35. Veenhuis M, Mateblowski M, Kunau WH, Harder W. Proliferation of microbodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1987;3:77-84.
36. Matsuyama A, Shirai A, Yashiroda Y, Kamata A, Horinouchi S, Yoshida M. pDUAL, a multipurpose, multicopy vector capable of chromosomal integration in fission yeast. Yeast 2004;21:1289-1305.
37. McCollum D, Monosov E, Subramani S. The pas8 mutant of Pichia pastoris exhibits the peroxisomal protein import deficiencies of Zellweger syndrome cells - the PAS8 protein binds to the COOH-terminal tripeptide peroxisomal targeting signal, and is a member of the TPR protein family. J Cell Biol 1993;121:761-774.
38. Brocard C, Kragler F, Simon MM, Schuster T, Hartig A. The tetratricopeptide repeat-domain of the PAS10 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is essential for binding the peroxisomal targeting signal-SKL. Biochim Biophys Res Commun 1994;204:1016-1022.
39. Azevedo JE, Schliebs W. Pex14p, more than just a docking protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1574-1584.
40. Robinow CF, Hyams JS. General cytology of fission yeast. In: Nasim A, Young P, Johnson BF, eds. Molecular Biology of the Fission Yeast. New York: Academic Press; 1989, pp. 273-330.
41. Binns D, Januszewski T, Chen Y, Hill J, Markin VS, Zhao Y, Gilpin C, Chapman KD, Anderson RG, Goodman JM. An intimate collaboration between peroxisomes and lipid bodies. J Cell Biol 2006;173:719-731.
42. Vater CA, Raymond CK, Ekena K, Howald-Stevenson I, Stevens TH. The VPS1 protein, a homolog of dynamin required for vacuolar protein sorting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a GTPase with two functionally separable domains. J Cell Biol 1992;119:773-786.
43. Ding D-Q, Chikashige Y, Haraguchi Y, Hiraoka Y. Oscillatory nuclear movement in fission yeast meiotic prophase is driven by astral microtubules, as revealed by continuous observation of chromosomes and microtubules in living cells. J Cell Sci 1998;111:701-712.
44. Höög JL, Schwartz C, Noon AT, O'Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR, Antony C. Organization of interphase microtubules in fission yeast analyzed by electron tomography. Dev Cell 2007;12:349-361.
45. Yaffe MP, Stuurman N, Vale RD. Mitochondrial positioning in fission yeast is driven by association with dynamic microtubules and mitotic spindle poles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:11424-11428.
46. Fagarasanu M, Fagarasanu A, Rachubinski RA. Sharing the wealth: peroxisome inheritance in budding yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1669-1677.
47. Pelham RJ, Chang F. Role of actin polymerization and actin cables in actin-patch movement in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:235-244.
48. Tournier S, Gachet Y, Buck V, Hyams JS, Millar JBA. Disruption of astral microtubule contact with the cell cortex activates a Bub1, Bub3 and Mad3-dependent checkpoint in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2004;15:3345-3356.
49. Win TZ, Gachet Y, Mulvihill DP, May KM, Hyams JS. Two type V myosins with non-overlapping functions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Myo52 is concerned with growth polarity and cytokinesis, Myo51 is a component of the cytokinetic actin ring. J Cell Sci 2001;114:69-79.
50. Feierbach B, Chang F. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr Biol 2001;11:1656-1665.
51. van der Zand A, Braakman I, Geuze HJ, Tabak HF. The return of the peroxisome. J Cell Sci 2006;119:989-994.
52. van der Klei IJ, Veenhuis M. Yeast and filamentous fungi as model organisms in microbody research. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1364-1373.
53. Erdmann R, Veenhuis M, Mertens D, Kunau WH. Isolation of peroxisome-deficient mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:5419-5423.
54. Warren G, Wickner W. Organelle inheritance. Cell 1996;84:395-400.
55. Farre JC, Subramani S. Peroxisome turnover by micropexophagy: An autophagy-related process. Trends Cell Biol 2004;14:515-523.
56. Sakai Y, Oku M, van der Klei IJ, Kiel JA. Pexophagy: Autophagic degradation of peroxisomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1767-1775.
57. Motley AM, Hettema EH. Yeast peroxisomes multiply by growth and division. J Cell Biol 2007;178:399-410.
58. Pitts KR, Yoon Y, Krueger EW, McNiven MA. The dynamin-like protein DLP1 is essential for normal distribution and morphology of the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 1999;10:4403-4417.
59. Schrader M, Thiemann M, Fahimi HD. Peroxisomal motility and interaction with microtubules. Microsc Res Tech 2003;61:171-178.
60. Kural C, Kim H, Syed S, Goshima G, Gelfand VI, Selvin PR. Kinesin and dynein move a peroxisome in vivo: A tug-of-war or coordinated movement? Science 2005;308:1469-1472.
61. Busch KE, Brunner D. The microtubule plus end-tracking proteins mal3p and tip1p cooperate for cell-end targeting of interphase microtubules. Curr Biol 2004;14:548-559.
62. Drummond DR, Cross RA. Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Biol 2000;10:766-775.
63. Kunze M, Pracharoenwattana I, Smith SM, Hartig A. A central role for the peroxisomal membrane in glyoxylate cycle function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1441-1452.
64. Jensen RE, Hobbs AE, Cerveny KL, Sesaki H. Yeast mitochondrial dynamics: fusion, division, segregation, and shape. Microsc Res Tech 2000;51:573-583.
65. Shaw JM, Nunnari J. Mitochondrial dynamics and division in budding yeast. Trends Cell Biol 2002;12:178-184.
66. Pidoux AL, Armstrong J. The BiP protein and the endoplasmic reticulum of Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Fate of the nuclear envelope during cell division. J Cell Sci 1993;105:1115-1120.
67. Peters C, Baars TL, Bulher S, Mayer A. Mutual control of membrane fission and fusion proteins. Cell 2004;119:581-582.
68. Guo T, Kit YY, Nicaud JM, Le Dall MT, Sears SK, Vali H, Chan H, Rachubinski RA, Titorenko VI. Peroxisome division in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica is regulated by a signal from inside the peroxisome. J Cell Biol 2003;162:1255-1266.
69. Rottensteiner H, Kramer A, Lorenzen S, Stein K, Landgraf C, Volkmer-Engert R, Erdmann R. Peroxisomal membrane proteins contain common Pex19p-binding sites that are an integral part of their targeting signals. Mol Biol Cell 2004;15:3406-3417.
70. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Meth Enzymol 1991;194:795-823.
71. Blanco MA, Sanchez-Diaz A, de Prada JM, Moreno S. APC (ste9/srw1) promotes degradation of mitotic cyclins in G(1) and is inhibited by cdc2 phosphorylation. EMBO J 2000;19:3945-3955.
72. Alfa CE, Ducommun B, Beach D, Hyams JS. Distinct nuclear and spindle pole body population of cyclin-cdc2 in fission yeast. Nature 1993;347:680-682.