Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-27

  Lin, Yi Mei ^a   Lin, Guan Yu ^b   Laffey, James M ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849091999     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.38.1.a     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences; A sociological theory of performance and imagination. New York: Sage.
2. Abrami, P. C., & Bernard, R. M. (2006). Research on distance education: In defense of field experiments. Distance Education, 24(1), 5-26.
3. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Marbry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.
4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Making the grade: Online education in the United States, 2006. Needham, MA: The Sloan-C. Retrieved July 16, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/ making_the_grade.pdf
5. American Federation of Teachers. (2000, May). Distance education: Guidelines for good practice (Doc No. 36-0693). Washington, DC: Higher Educational Program and Policy Council. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/higher_education_ed/distance.pdf
6. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
7. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
8. Artino, A. R., Jr. (2007). Self-regulated learning in online education: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(6), article 1. Retrieved June 29, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jun_07/article01.htm
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
10. Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1998). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 497-505.
12. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday & Co.
13. Bong, M. (2001). Between and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school, students: Self-efficacy, task-value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23-34.
14. Boverie, P., Nagel, L., McGee, M., & Garcia, S. (1998). Predictors of satisfaction for distance learners: A study of variable conditions. Sigcue-Outlook, 26(2), 2-7.
15. Bures, E., Amundsen, C., & Abrami, P. (2002). Motivation to learn via computer conferencing (CC): Exploring how task-specific motivation and CC expectations are related to student acceptance of learning via CC. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(3), 249-264.
16. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Cavallo, A. M. L. (2002). Motivation and affect toward learning science among preservice elementary school teachers: Implications for classroom teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 25-38.
18. Chavis, D. M., & Pretty, G. (1999). Sense of community: Advances in measurement and application. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 635-642.
19. Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.
20. Chute, A. G., Thompson, M. M., & Hancock, B. W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distancE-learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 179-231). New York: Random House.
22. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Construct validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.
23. Cutler, R. H. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology, 3(2), 12-32. Retrieved July 25, 2007, from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/cutler.txt
24. DeBourgh, G. A. (1999, March). Technology is the tool, teaching is the task: Student satisfaction in distance learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
25. Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinkus, M., & Zaim, S. (2006). An analysis of the relationship between TQM. implementation and organizational performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 829-847.
26. Donio, J., Massari, P., & Passiante, G. (2006). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in a digital environment: An empirical test. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 445-457.
27. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
28. Dweck, C. S. (1990). Self-theories and goals: Their role in motivation, personality, and development (Vol. 38). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
29. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
30. Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
31. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.
32. Finn, A., & Kayande, U. (2004). Scale modification: Alternative approaches and their consequences. Journal of Retailing, 80(1), 37-52.
33. Flewelling, J., & Snider, D. (2005). Extending the foreign language classroom with technology: Creating computerized oral activities and tests. Paper presented at the Central. States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Language, Columbus, OH. Retrieved July 28, 2007, from http://www.xpresslab.com/about/Publications/Ohio_2005.pdf
34. Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
35. Fullerton, G., & Talor, S. (2002). Mediating, interactive, and non-linear effects in service quality and satisfaction with services research. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 124-136.
36. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.
37. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
38. Gunnawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
39. Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Hao, Y. (2004). Students' attitudes toward interaction in online learning: Exploring the relationship between attitudes, learning styles, and course satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
41. Hare, A. P., & Davies, M. F. (1994). Social interaction. In A. P. Hare, H. H. Blubmberg, M. F. Davies, & M. V. Kent (Eds.), Small group research: A handbook (pp. 169-193). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1-12.
43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453.
44. Jain, H., Ramamurthy, K., Ryu, H., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1998). Success of data resource management in distributed environments: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 1-29.
45. Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49.
46. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in Web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
47. Kahn, J. H. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 684-718.
48. Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 8. Retrieved. July 21, 2007 from http://72.14.235.104/search? q=cache:Qe6kegZbUAMJ:jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kanuka. html+%22written+communication+skills%22+%2B+%22 text+based%22+%2B+%22online+learning%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2
49. Kim, J. O., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Kleiner, C. (2000). Best graduate schools: Degrees of separation. U.S. News & World Report, 128(14), 56-59.
51. Klesius, J., Homan, S., & Thompson, T. (1997). Distance education compared to traditional instruction: The students' view. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), 207-220.
52. Laffey, J., Lin, G., & Lin, Y. (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 166-173.
53. Lauzon, A. C. (1992). Integrating computer-based instruction with computer conferencing: An evaluation of a model for designing online education. American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 32-46.
54. Lee, C. (2000). The impact of self-efficacy and task value on satisfaction and performance in a Web-based course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida.
55. Lee, C., & Witta, E. L. (2001, November). Online students' perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology International Convention, Atlanta, Georgia.
56. Lin, Y. (2005). Understanding students ' technology appropriation and learning perceptions in online learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
57. Lin, Y., & McKeachie, W. J. (1999, August). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
58. Miltiadou, M. (2001, October). Motivational constructs as predictors of success in the online classroom. Paper presented in the annual meeting of Arizona Educational Research Organization, New Orleans, Louisiana. Retrieved July 27, 2007, from http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc703/mariosf.html
59. Miltiadou, M., & Savenye, W. C. (2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 11(1), 78-95.
60. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
61. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113.
63. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. New York: Academic Press.
65. Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-100.
66. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
67. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792-802.
68. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Difference.pdf
69. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
70. Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement; Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
72. Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
74. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
75. Ray, M., Garavalia, L., & Murdock, T. (2003). Aptitude, motivation, and self-regulation as predictors of achievement among developmental college students. Retrieved July 15, 2007, from http://www.findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_qa4116/is_200310/ai_n9287850
76. Reynold, D., & Biel, D. (2007). Incorporation satisfaction measures into a restaurant productivity index. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(2), 352-361.
77. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-87.
78. Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-12.
79. Russell, T. L. (1999). No significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
80. Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646.
81. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
82. Sarason, S. B. (1986). Commentary: The emergence of a conceptual center. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 405-407.
83. Schlosser, C. A., & Anderson, M. L. (1994). Distance education: A review of the literature. Ames, IA: Iowa Distance Education Alliance, Iowa State University.
84. Schneider, C. (2004, February). The challenges of online language learning: A general perspective. Global Educator, 1-4. Retrieved July 28, 2007 from http://www.whirligig.com/au/globaleducator/articles/ ChristelSchneider2004.pdf
85. Sharma, N., & Patterson, P. G. (2000). Switching costs, alternative attractiveness and experience as moderators of relationship commitment in professional, consumer services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11 (5), 470-490.
86. Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2002). Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Online education (Vol. 2, pp. 31-54). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
87. Simonsen, M. (1997). Does anyone really want to learn at a distance? Contemporary Education, 68(2), 104-107.
88. Smith, G. G., & Ferguson, D. (2005). Student attrition in mathematics e-learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 323-334.
89. Stokes, S. P. (2001). Satisfaction of college students with the digital learning environment: Do learners' temperaments make a difference? Internet and Higher Education, 4(1), 31-44.
90. Stonebraker, P. W., & Hazeltine, J. E. (2004). Virtual learning effectiveness: An examination of the process. The Learning Organization, 11(3), 209-225.
91. Swan, J. E., & Bowers, M. R. (1998). Services quality and satisfaction: The process of people doing things together. Journal of Services Marketing, 12(1), 59-72.
92. Swan, K., Schenker, J., Lin, Y., Shea, P., & Aviv, R. (2006, April). Students satisfaction with online learning: A concept analysis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
93. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
94. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
95. Terry, N. (2007). Assessing instruction modes for master of business administration (MBA) courses. Journal of Education for Business, 82(4), 220-225.
96. Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1996). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 240-280). New York: Longman.
97. Truman, B. E. (1995). Distance education in post secondary institutions and business since 1988. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved July 06, 2007, from http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~btruman/dist-lr.html
98. Twigg, C. (2001). Innovations in online learning: Moving beyond no significant difference. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
99. Twigg, C., & Oblinger, D. (1996). The virtual university. Paper presented at the Joint Educom/IBM Roundtable. Retrieved July 06. 2007, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/hli0003.html
100. Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34-45.
101. Tu, C., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
102. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
103. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451-469.
105. Young, C. (2002). Task design principles of a campus-based communication skills course in a natural-virtual learning community. Computers in Education. Paper presented at the International Conference in Computers in Education.