Cooperative learning

ACS Symposium Series

Volumn 970, Issue , 2007, Pages 34-53

  Felder, Richard M ^a   Brent, Rebecca ^b  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

^b Education Designs   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749082059     PISSN: 00976156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2007-0970.ch004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T.; Stanne, M. E. Cooperative Learning Methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Cooperative Learning Center, 2000; http://www.co-operation.org/pages/clmethods.html (accessed October 5, 2006).
2. Smith, K. A.; Sheppard, S. D.; Johnson, D. W.; Johnson, R. T. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. J. Engr. Education 2005, 94, 87-101.
3. Springer, L.; Stanne, M. E.; Donovan, S. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. National Institute for Science Education: Madison, WI, 1997; http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/nise/CL1/CL/resource/R2.htm (accessed October 5, 2006).
4. Terenzini, P. T.; Cabrera, A. F.; Colbeck, C. L.; Parente, J. M.; Bjorklund, S. A. Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. J. Engr. Education 2001, 90, 123-130.
5. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School; Bransford, J.; Brown, A. L.; Cocking, R. R., Eds.; National Academy: Washington, DC, 2000; http://www.nap.edu/books/0309070368/html/ (accessed October 6, 2006).
6. th ed.); Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA, 2002.
7. nd ed.); Interaction Book: Edina, MN. 1998.
8. Peer-led Team Learning: A Guidebook; Gosser, D. K.; Cracolice, M. S.; Kampmeier, J. A.; Roth, V.; Strozak, V. S.; Varma-Nelson, P. Eds.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
9. Sarquis, J. L.; Dixon, L. J.; Gosser, D. K.; Kampmeier, J. A.; Roth, V.; Strozak, V. S.; Varma-Nelson, P. The Workshop Project: Peer-led team learning in chemistry. In Student-assisted Teaching: A Guide to Faculty-student Teamwork; Miller J. E.; Groccia J. E.; Miller M. Eds.; Anker: Bolton, MA, 2001; pp 150-155.
10. Tien, L. T.; Roth, V.; Kampmeier, J. A., Implementation of a Peer-Led Team Learning Approach in an Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Course. J. Research in Sci. Teaching 2002, 39, 606-632.
11. Nurrenbern, S. C.; Robinson, W. R. Cooperative Learning: A Bibbliography. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 623-624.
12. Hinde, R. J.; Kovac, J. Student active learning methods in physical chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 93-99.
13. Wamser, C. C. Peer-Led Team Learning in Organic Chemistry: Effects on Student Performance, Success, and Persistence in the Course. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 1562-1566.
14. Pederson, P. An alternative biological sciences laboratory. J. Coll. Sci. Teaching 1994, 24, 162-165.
15. Dougherty, R. C. Grade/study-performance contracts, enhanced communication, cooperative learning, and student performance. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 722-726.
16. Hanson, D.; Wolfskill, T. Process workshops: A new model for instruction. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 120-130.
17. Wolfskill, T.; Hanson, D., LUCID: A New Model for Computer-Assisted Learning. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 1417-1424.
18. Bowen, C. W. A Quantitative Literature Review of Cooperative Learning Effects on High School and College Chemistry Achievement. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 116-119.
19. Hake, R. R. Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. Am. J. Phys. 1998, 66, 64-74.
20. Cabrera, A. F.; Crissman, J. L.; Bernai, E. M.; Nora, A.; Terenzini, P. T.; Pascarella, E. T. Collaborative Learning: Its Impact on College Students' Development and Diversity. J. Coll. Stud. Development 2002, 43, 20-34.
21. Towns, M. H.; Kreke, K.; Fields, A. An Action Research Project: Student Perspectives on Small-Group Learning in Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77, 111-115.
22. Felder, R. M.; Brent, R. Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs, ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 377038, 1994, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/ Coopreport.html (accessed October 6, 2006).
23. Felder, R. M.; Brent, R. Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. J. Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching 2001, 10, 69-75, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/CLStrategies(JCCCT). pdf (accessed October 6, 2006).
24. Oakley, B.; Felder, R. M.; Brent, R.; and Elhajj, I. Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. J. Student Centered Learning 2004, 2, 9-34, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Oakley-paper(JSCL). pdf (accessed October 6, 2006).
25. Heller, P.; Hollabaugh, M. Teaching Problem Solving through Cooperative Grouping. Part II: Designing Problems and Structuring Groups. Am. J. Phys. 1992, 60, 637-644.
26. Rosser, S. V. Group Work in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics: Consequences of Ignoring Gender and Race. Coll. Teaching 1998, 46(3), 82-88.
27. Cavanaugh, R.; Ellis, M.; Layton, R.; Ardis, M. Automating the Process of Assigning Students to Cooperative-Learning Teams, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004. See http://teammaker. cs.rose-hulman.edu/ (accessed October 6, 2006) for information about obtaining and using this instrument.
28. Kaufman, D. B.; Felder, R. M.; Fuller, H. Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperative Learning Teams. J. Engr. Education 2000, 89, 133-140, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Kaufmanpap.pdf (accessed October 6, 2006).
29. Ohland, M. W.; Loughry, M. L.; Carter, R. L.; Bullard, L. G.; Felder, R. M.; Finelli, C. J.; Layton, R. A.; Schmucker, D. G. The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME): A New Peer Evaluation Instrument. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, June 2006. Information about CATME may be found at http://www.catme.org (accessed October 6, 2006).
30. Felder, R. M.; Brent, R. Learning by Doing. Chem. Engr. Education 2003, 37, 282-283, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/ Active.pdf (accessed October 6, 2006).
31. Felder, R. M.; Brent, R. Navigating The Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction. College Teaching 1996, 44, 43-47, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/Resist.html (accessed October 6, 2006).
32. Felder, R. M. A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. IV. Instructional Methods and Student Responses to Them. J. Engr. Education 1995, 84, 361-367, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder- public/Papers/long4.html (accessed October 6, 2006).
33. Felder, R. M.; Felder, G. N.; Dietz, E. J. A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students. J. Engr. Education 1998, 87, 469-480, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/long5.html (accessed October 6, 2006).
34. Felder, R. M. The Alumni Speak. Chem. Engr. Education 2000, 34, 238-239, http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Columns/alumni.html (accessed October 6, 2006).