Proteomics of proteasome complexes and ubiquitinated proteins

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 649-665

  Wang, Xiaorong ^a   Guerrero, Cortnie ^a   Kaiser, Peter ^b   Huang, Lan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mass spectrometry; Proteasome complex; Protein degradation; Protein post translational modification; Protein protein interaction; Proteomics; QTAX; Ubiquitin chain topology; Ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

PROTEASOME; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; UBIQUITIN;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL GROWTH; DNA REPAIR; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 35448962393     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14789450.4.5.649     Document Type: Review

References (116)

1. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068 (1999). • Extensive review of the 26S proteasome.
2. Pickart CM, Cohen RE. Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5(3), 177-187 (2004). • Summary of our current knowledge on the functions of the proteasomes and mechanisms of substrate unfolding.
3. Hendil KB, Hartmann-Petersen R, Tanaka K. 26 S proteasomes function as stable entities. J. Mol. Biol. 315(4), 627-636 (2002).
4. Glickman MH, Raveh D. Proteasome plasticity. FEBS Lett. 579(15), 3214-3223 (2005).
5. Hoffman L, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M. Multiple forms of the 20 S multicatalytic and the 26 S ubiquitin/ATP-dependent proteases from rabbit reticulocyte lysate. J. Biol. Chem. 267(31), 22632-22638 (1992).
6. Ustrell V, Hoffman L, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M. PA200, a nuclear proteasome activator involved in DNA repair. EMBO J. 21(13), 3516-3525 (2002).
7. Schmidt M, Haas W, Crosas B et al. The HEAT repeat protein Blm10 regulates the yeast proteasome by capping the core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12(4), 294-303 (2005).
8. Löwe J, Stock D, Jap B et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 268, 533-539 (1995).
9. Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386(6624), 463-471 (1997).
10. Gaczynska M, Rock KL, Goldberg AL. Role of proteasomes in antigen presentation. Enzyme Protein 47(4-6), 354-369 (1993).
11. Whitby FG, Masters EI, Kramer L et al. Structural basis for the activation of 20S proteasomes by 11S regulators. Nature 408(6808), 115-120 (2000).
12. Schmidt M, Hanna J, Elsasser S, Finley D. Proteasome-associated proteins: regulation of a proteolytic machine. Biol. Chem. 386(8), 725-737 (2005). •• Focuses on the proteasome-interacting proteins, which can regulate proteasome function in various ways, including assisting substrate delivery, altering the dynamics of ubiquitin chains and changing the stability of the complex and the hydrolytic activity of the core particle.
13. Wang X, Chen CF, Baker PR et al. Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. Biochemistry 46(11), 3553-3565 (2007). • Describes a new and efficient method for affinity purification of the human 26S proteasome complexes.
14. Verma R, Oania R, Graumann J, Deshaies RJ. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 118(1), 99-110 (2004).
15. Elsasser S, Finley D. Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines. Nat. Cell. Biol. 7(8), 742-749 (2005).
16. Elsasser S, Gali RR, Schwickart M et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell. Biol. 4(9) 725-730 (2002).
17. Saeki Y, Saitoh A, Toh-e A, Yokosawa H. Ubiquitin-like proteins and Rpn10 play cooperative roles in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293(3), 986-992 (2002).
18. Seeger M, Hartmann-Petersen R, Wilkinson CR et al. Interaction of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and proteasome protein complexes with multiubiquitin chain-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278(19), 16791-16796 (2003).
19. Verma R, Aravind L, Oania R et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298(5593), 611-615 (2002).
20. Deveraux Q, Ustrell V, Pickart C, Rechsteiner M. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 269(10), 7058-7061 (1994).
21. Elsasser S, Chandler-Militello D, Muller B, Hanna J, Finley D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 279(26), 26817-26822 (2004).
22. Lam YA, Lawson TG, Velayutham M, Zweier JL, Pickart CM. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature 416(6882), 763-767 (2002).
23. Saeki Y, Sone T, Toh-e A, Yokosawa H. Identification of ubiquitin-like protein-binding subunits of the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 296(4), 813-819 (2002).
24. Richly H, Rape M, Braun S et al. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120(1), 73-84 (2005).
25. Guterman A, Glickman MH. Deubiquitinating enzymes are IN/(trinsic to proteasome function). Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 5(3), 201-211 (2004).
26. Lam YA, Xu W, DeMartino GN, Cohen RE. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature 385(6618), 737-740 (1997).
27. Hanna J, Finley D. A proteasome for all occasions. FEBS Lett. 581(15), 2854-2861 (2007).
28. Crosas B, Hanna J, Kirkpatrick DS et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 127(7), 1401-1413 (2006).
29. Braun BC, Glickman M, Kraft R et al. The base of the proteasome regulatory particle exhibits chaperone-like activity. Nat. Cell. Biol. 1(4), 221-226 (1999).
30. Strickland E, Hakala K, Thomas PJ, DeMartino GN. Recognition of misfolding proteins by PA700, the regulatory subcomplex of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275(8), 5565-5572 (2000).
31. Verma R, Chen S, Feldman R et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11(10), 3425-3439 (2000). • Describes the first proteomic analysis of the proteasome complex and its interacting proteins in yeast.
32. Huang L, Jacob RJ, Pegg SC et al. Functional assignment of the 20 S proteasome from Trypanosoma brucei using mass spectrometry and new bioinformatics approaches. J. Biol. Chem. 276(30), 28327-28339 (2001).
33. Huang L, Burlingame AL. Comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis of the 20S proteasome complex. Methods Enzymol. 405, 187-236 (2005).
34. Guerrero C, Tagwerker C, Kaiser P, Huang L. An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach: quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting network. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5(2), 366-378 (2006). •• A new integrated strategy (i.e., QTAX) has been developed to study protein-protein interactions and enables the capture, identification and quantification of specific protein interactions, including stable, weak and/or transient interactions.
35. Gomes AV, Zong C, Edmondson RD et al. Mapping the murine cardiac 26S proteasome complexes. Circ. Res. 99(4), 362-371 (2006).
36. Zong C, Gomes AV, Drews O et al. Regulation of murine cardiac 20S proteasomes: role of associating partners. Circ. Res. 99(4), 372-380 (2006).
37. Gomes AV, Zong C, Edmondson RD et al. The murine cardiac 26S proteasome: an organelle awaiting exploration. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1047, 197-207 (2005). • Summarizes a functional proteomic study of murine cardiac 26S proteasome complex and presents an overview on proteasome-dependent protein degradation in mammalian cells.
38. Sharon M, Taverner T, Ambroggio XI, Deshaies RJ, Robinson CV. Structural organization of the 19S proteasome lid: insights from MS of intact complexes. PLoS Biol. 4(8), e267 (2006). • A nice application of native mass spectrometry to elucidate the subunit architecture of the 19S lid complex.
39. Sharon M, Witt S, Felderer K et al. 20S proteasomes have the potential to keep substrates in store for continual degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 281(14), 9569-9575 (2006).
40. Sharon M, Witt S, Glasmacher E, Baumeister W, Robinson CV. Mass spectrometry reveals the missing links in the assembly pathway of the bacterial 20 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 282(25), 18448-18457 (2007).
41. Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 921-926 (2003). •• This is the first report on identification of ubiquitinated substrates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using affinity purification and mass spectrometry at the proteome scale.
42. Kirkpatrick DS, Weldon SF, Tsaprailis G, Liebler DC, Gandolfi AJ. Proteomic identification of ubiquitinated proteins from human cells expressing His-tagged ubiquitin. Proteomics 5(8), 2104-2111 (2005).
43. Matsumoto M, Hatakeyama S, Oyamada K et al. Large-scale analysis of the human ubiquitin-related proteome. Proteomics 5(16), 4145-4151 (2005).
44. Kirkpatrick DS, Denison C, Gygi SP. Weighing in on ubiquitin: the expanding role of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Cell. Biol. 7(8), 750-757 (2005). • Summarizes proteomic studies of protein ubiquitination.
45. Kirkpatrick DS, Hathaway NA, Hanna J et al. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nat. Cell. Biol. 8(7), 700-710 (2006). • Presents a detailed proteomic analysis of ubiquitin chain topology on cyclin B1 that has been modified in vitro. The results provide unique insights into the mechanisms of substrate ubiquitination.
46. Mayor T, Russell LJ, Graumann J, Smith GT, Deshaies RJ. Analysis of poly-ubiquitin conjugates reveals that the Rpn10 substrate receptor contributes to the turnover of multiple proteasome targets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4(6), 741-751 (2005).
47. Schmidt F, Dahlmann B, Janek K et al. Comprehensive quantitative proteome analysis of 20S proteasome subtypes from rat liver by isotope coded affinity tag and 2-D gel-based approaches. Proteomics 6(16), 4622-4632 (2006).
48. Malik MN, Spivack WD, Sheikh AM, Fenko MD. The 26S proteasome in garlic (Allium sativum): purification and partial characterization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52(11), 3350-3355 (2004).
49. Holzl H, Kapelari B, Kellermann J et al. The regulatory complex of Drosophila melanogaster 26S proteasomes. Subunit composition and localization of a deubiquitylating enzyme. J. Cell Biol. 150(1), 119-130 (2000).
50. Yang P, Fu H, Walker J et al. Purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 279(8), 6401-6413 (2004).
51. Drews O, Wildgruber R, Zong C et al. Mammalian proteasome subpopulations with distinct molecular compositions and proteolytic activities. Mol. Cell. Proteomics (2007) (In Press). • A detailed study of the heterogeneity in murine cardiac proteasomes using free-flow electrophoresis.
52. Claverol S, Burlet-Schiltz O, Girbal-Neuhauser E, Gairin JE, Monsarrat B. Mapping and structural dissection of human 20 S proteasome using proteomic approaches. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1(8), 567-578 (2002).
53. Hendil KB. Development and use of antiproteasome monoclonal antibodies. Methods Enzymol. 398, 439-453 (2005).
54. Kimura Y, Saeki Y, Yokosawa H et al. N-terminal modifications of the 19S regulatory particle subunits of the yeast proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 409(2), 341-348 (2003).
55. Leggett DS, Hanna J, Borodovsky A et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10(3), 495-507 (2002). • Demonstrated that proteasomeinteracting proteins are susceptible to salt concentration. Ubp6 associates with the proteasome and represents the predominant ubiquitin-AMC hydrolyzing activity of the yeast proteasome.
56. Leggett DS, Glickman MH, Finley D. Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 301, 57-70 (2005).
57. Rigaut G, Shevchenko A, Rutz B et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17(10), 1030-1032 (1999).
58. Gavin A, Bosche M, Krause R et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415(6868), 141-147 (2002).
59. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415(6868), 180-183 (2002).
60. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440(7084), 631-636 (2006).
61. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440(7084), 637-643 (2006).
62. Bouwmeester T, Bauch A, Ruffner H et al. A physical and functional map of the human TNF-α/NF-κ B signal transduction pathway. Nat. Cell. Biol. 6(2), 97-105 (2004).
63. Tagwerker C, Flick K, Cui M et al. A tandem affinity tag for two-step purification under fully denaturing conditions: application in ubiquitin profiling and protein complex identification combined with in vivo cross-linking. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5(4), 737-748 (2006). • Describes a novel purification strategy for isolating proteins under fully denaturing conditions.
64. Humbard MA, Stevens SM Jr, Maupin-Furlow JA. Posttranslational modification of the 20S proteasomal proteins of the archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 188(21), 7521-7530 (2006).
65. Hayter JR, Doherty MK, Whitehead C et al. The subunit structure and dynamics of the 20S proteasome in chicken skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4(9), 1370-1381 (2005).
66. Froment C, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Bousquet-Dubouch MP et al. A quantitative proteomic approach using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and isotope-coded affinity tag labeling for studying human 20S proteasome heterogeneity. Proteomics 5(9), 2351-2363 (2005).
67. Iwafune Y, Kawasaki H, Hirano H. Electrophoretic analysis of phosphorylation of the yeast 20S proteasome. Electrophoresis 23(2), 329-338 (2002).
68. Iwafune Y, Kawasaki H, Hirano H. Identification of three phosphorylation sites in the α7 subunit of the yeast 20S proteasome in vivo using mass spectrometry. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 431(1), 9-15 (2004).
69. Baldovino S, Piccinini M, Anselmino A et al. Structural and functional properties of proteasomes purified from the human kidney. J. Nephrol. 19(6), 710-716 (2006).
70. Drews O, Zong C, Ping P. Exploring proteasome complexes by proteomic approaches. Proteomics 7(7), 1047-1058 (2007).
71. Dahlmann B, Ruppert T, Kuehn L, Merforth S, Kloetzel PM. Different proteasome subtypes in a single tissue exhibit different enzymatic properties. J. Mol. Biol. 303(5), 643-653 (2000).
72. Dahlmann B, Ruppert T, Kloetzel PM, Kuehn L. Subtypes of 20S proteasomes from skeletal muscle. Biochimie 83(3-4), 295-299 (2001).
73. Tanahashi N, Murakami Y, Minami Y et al. Hybrid proteasomes. Induction by interferon-γ and contribution to ATP-dependent proteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 275(19), 14336-14345 (2000).
74. Shibatani T, Carlson EJ, Larabee F et al. Global organization and function of mammalian cytosolic proteasome pools: implications for PA28 and 19S regulatory complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17(12), 4962-4971 (2006).
75. Camacho-Carvajal MM, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R, Steimle V, Schamel WW. Two-dimensional Blue native/SDS gel electrophoresis of multi-protein complexes from whole cellular lysates: a proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3(2), 176-182 (2004).
76. Elsasser S, Schmidt M, Finley D. Characterization of the proteasome using native gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 398, 353-363 (2005).
77. α- acetylation and proteolytic activity of the yeast 20 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275(7), 4635-4639 (2000).
78. Polevoda B, Sherman F. Nα-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 275(47), 36479-36482 (2000).
79. Horiguchi R, Dohra H, Tokumoto T. Comparative proteome analysis of changes in the 26S proteasome during oocyte maturation in goldfish. Proteomics 6(14), 4195-4202 (2006).
80. Bose S, Brooks P, Mason GG, Rivett AJ. γ-Interferon decreases the level of 26 S proteasomes and changes the pattern of phosphorylation. Biochem. J. 353(Pt 2), 291-297 (2001).
81. Bardag-Gorce F, Venkatesh R, Li J, French BA, French SW. Hyperphosphorylation of rat liver proteasome subunits: the effects of ethanol and okadaic acid are compared. Life Sci. 75(5), 585-597 (2004).
82. Bose S, Mason GG, Rivett AJ. Phosphorylation of proteasomes in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Rep. 26(1-2), 11-14 (1999).
83. Satoh K, Sasajima H, Nyoumura KI, Yokosawa H, Sawada H. Assembly of the 26S proteasome is regulated by phosphorylation of the p45/Rpt6 ATPase subunit. Biochemistry 40(2), 314-319 (2001).
84. Zhang F, Hu Y, Huang P et al. Proteasome function is regulated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase through phosphorylation of Rpt6. J. Biol. Chem. 282(31), 22460-22471 (2007).
85. Mason GG, Murray RZ, Pappin D, Rivett AJ. Phosphorylation of ATPase subunits of the 26S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 430(3), 269-274 (1998).
86. Mason GG, Hendil KB, Rivett AJ. Phosphorylation of proteasomes in mammalian cells. Identification of two phosphorylated subunits and the effect of phosphorylation on activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 238(2), 453-462 (1996).
87. Bose S, Stratford FL, Broadfoot KI, Mason GG, Rivett AJ. Phosphorylation of 20S proteasome α subunit C8 (α7) stabilizes the 26S proteasome and plays a role in the regulation of proteasome complexes by γ-interferon. Biochem. J. 378(Part 1), 177-184 (2004).
88. Castano JG, Mahillo E, Arizti P, Arribas J. Phosphorylation of C8 and C9 subunits of the multicatalytic proteinase by casein kinase II and identification of the C8 phosphorylation sites by direct mutagenesis. Biochemistry 35(12), 3782-3789 (1996).
89. Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101(33), 12130-12135 (2004).
90. Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23(1), 94-101 (2005).
91. Brill LM, Salomon AR, Ficarro SB et al. Robust phosphoproteomic profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation sites from human T cells using immobilized metal affinity chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76(10), 2763-2772 (2004).
92. Wells L, Vosseller K, Hart GW. Glycosylation of nucleocytoplasmic proteins: signal transduction and O-GlcNAc. Science 291(5512), 2376-2378 (2001).
93. Sumegi M, Hunyadi-Gulyas E, Medzihradszky KF, Udvardy A. 26S proteasome subunits are O-linked N-acetylglucosamine-modified in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 312(4), 1284-1289 (2003).
94. Zhang F, Su K, Yang X et al. O-GlcNAc modification is an endogenous inhibitor of the proteasome. Cell 115(6), 715-725 (2003). • Proteasome subunit Rpt2 can be O-glycosylated, which directly regulates the proteasome activity.
95. O'Donnell N, Zachara NE, Hart GW, Marth JD. Ogt-dependent X-chromosomelinked protein glycosylation is a requisite modification in somatic cell function and embryo viability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(4), 1680-1690 (2004).
96. Ishii T, Sakurai T, Usami H, Uchida K. Oxidative modification of proteasome: identification of an oxidation-sensitive subunit in 26 S proteasome. Biochemistry 44(42), 13893-13901 (2005).
97. Farout L, Mary J, Vinh J, Szweda LI, Friguet B. Inactivation of the proteasome by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal is site specific and dependant on 20S proteasome subtypes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 453(1), 135-142 (2006).
98. Miller J, Gordon C. The regulation of proteasome degradation by multi-ubiquitin chain binding proteins. FEBS Lett. 579(15), 3224-3230 (2005).
99. Hartmann-Petersen R, Gordon C. Proteins interacting with the 26S proteasome. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 61(13), 1589-1595 (2004).
100. Mann M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7(12), 952-958 (2006). •• SILAC is a simple and powerful quantitative method, which has been extensively used in the studies of protein-protein interaction, protein dynamics and signaling pathways.
101. Luders J, Demand J, Hohfeld J. The ubiquitin-related BAG-1 provides a link between the molecular chaperones Hsc70/Hsp70 and the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 275(7), 4613-4617 (2000).
102. Wiederkehr T, Bukau B, Buchberger A. Protein turnover: a CHIP programmed for proteolysis. Curr. Biol. 12(1), R26-R28 (2002).
103. Tokumoto T, Kondo A, Miwa J et al. Regulated interaction between polypeptide chain elongation factor-1 complex with the 26S proteasome during Xenopus oocyte maturation. BMC Biochem. 4, 6 (2003).
104. Chuang SM, Chen L, Lambertson D et al. Proteasome-mediated degradation of cotranslationally damaged proteins involves translation elongation factor 1A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25(1), 403-413 (2005).
105. Chuang SM, Madura K. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ub-conjugating enzyme Ubc4 binds the proteasome in the presence of translationally-damaged proteins. Genetics 171(4), 1477-1484 (2005).
106. Denison C, Kirkpatrick DS, Gygi SP. Proteomic insights into ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9(1), 69-75 (2005).
107. Kaiser P, Huang L. Global approaches to understanding ubiquitination. Genome Biol. 6(10), 233 (2005).
108. Coulombe P, Rodier G, Bonneil E, Thibault P, Meloche S. N-Terminal ubiquitination of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 3 and p21 directs their degradation by the proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24(14), 6140-6150 (2004).
109. Cadwell K, Coscoy L. Ubiquitination on nonlysine residues by a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 309(5731), 127-130 (2005).
110. Finley D, Sadis S, Monia BP et al. Inhibition of proteolysis and cell cycle progression in a multiubiquitinationdeficient yeast mutant. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14(8), 5501-5509 (1994).
111. Spence J, Sadis S, Haas AL, Finley D. A ubiquitin mutant with specific defects in DNA repair and multiubiquitination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15(3), 1265-1273 (1995).
112. Wang C, Deng L, Hong M et al. TAK1 is a ubiquitin-dependent kinase of MKK and IKK. Nature 412(6844), 346-351 (2001).
113. Flick K, Ouni I, Wohlschlegel JA et al. Proteolysis-independent regulation of the transcription factor Met4 by a single Lys 48-linked ubiquitin chain. Nat. Cell. Biol. 6(7), 634-641 (2004). •• Met4 is polyubiquitinated and the ubiquitin chain attached to Met4 is linked through Lys 48 in ubiquitin. Interestingly, Cdc34-SCF(Met30)-catalyzed Met4 ubiquitination has a proteolysisindependent role, suggesting that Lys 48-linked ubiquitin chains can have a regulatory role, independent of proteolysis.
114. Kim HT, Kim KP, Lledias F et al. Certain pairs of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) synthesize nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains containing all possible isopeptide linkages. J. Biol. Chem. 282(24), 17375-17386 (2007).
115. Hitchcock AL, Auld K, Gygi SP, Silver PA. A subset of membrane-associated proteins is ubiquitinated in response to mutations in the endoplasmic reticulum degradation machinery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100(22), 12735-12740 (2003).
116. NetPhosK 1.0 Server www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetPhosK