A soft docking algorithm for predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 47-50

  Li, Chun Hua ^a   Ma, Xiao Hui ^a   Chen, Wei Zu ^a   Wang, Cun Xin ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Antibody antigen interactions; Molecular flexibility; Molecular recognition; Soft docking

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; EPITOPE;

ALGORITHM; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; EXPERIMENT; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ALPHA-AMYLASE; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS; BINDING SITES, ANTIBODY; EPITOPES; IMMUNOGLOBULIN VARIABLE REGION; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

CAMELIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0037683580     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10382     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13-20.
2. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999;285:2177-2198.
3. Norel R, Retrey D, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins. Proteins 1999;36:307-317.
4. Betts MJ, Sternberg MJE. An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Eng 1999;12:271-283.
5. Decanniere K, Transue TR, Desmyter A, Maes D, Muyldermans S, Wyns L. Degenerate interfaces in antigen-antibody complexes. J Mol Biol 2001;313:473-478.
6. Jackson RM. Comparison of protein-protein interactions in serine protease-inhibitor and antibody-antigen complexes: implications for the protein docking problem. Protein Sci 1999;8:603-613.
7. Li CH, Ma XH, Chen WZ, Wang CX. A protein-protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of the complexes. Protein Eng 2003; (in press).
8. Desmyter A, Spinelli S, Payan F, Lauwereys M, Wyns L, Muyldermans S, Cambillau C. Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic α-amylase. J Biol Chem 2002;227:23645-23650.
9. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformation for rapid simulation of protein protein folding. J Mol Biol 1976;104:59-107.
10. Cherfils J, Janin J. Protein docking algorithms: simulating molecular recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1993;3:265-269.
11. Zhao S, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Analysis of a data set of paired uncomplexed protein structures: new metrics for side-chain flexibility and model evaluation. Proteins 2001;43:271-279.
12. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
13. Cherfils J, Duquerroy S, Janin J. Protein-protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation. Proteins 1991;11:271-280.
14. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. Charmm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4:187-217.
15. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;268:1144-1149.
16. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized protein. J Mol Biol 1997;3:707-726.
17. Zhang C, Chen J, DeLisi C. Protein-protein recognition: exploring the energy funnels near the binding sites. Proteins 1999;34:255-267.
18. Muyldermans S, Cambillau C, Wyns L. Recognition of antigens by single domain antibody fragments: the superfluous luxury of paired domains. Trends Biochem Sci 2001;26:230-223