Can differences in the ability to recognize words cease to have an effect under certain reading conditions?

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 290-305

  Sánchez, Emilio ^a   García, José Ricardo ^a   Gonzalez, Antonio José ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE PSICOLOGIA APLICADA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547453908     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194070400040101     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Allor, J. H., Fuchs, D., & Mathes, P. (2001). Do students with and without lexical retrieval weaknesses respond differently to instruction? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 264-275.
2. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/ summarization instruction facilitate learning expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
3. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. Reading Teacher, 42, 130-137.
4. Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 244-255.
5. Blachman, B. A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Clonan, S. M., Shaywitz, B. A., et al. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 444-461.
6. Bovair, S., & Kieras, D. E. (1985). A guide to prepositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Bowers, P., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69-85.
8. Brown, R., Pressley, M., van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
9. Bryant, P. (2002). Children's thoughts about reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 199-216.
10. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489-503.
11. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 313-338). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 31-40.
13. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42.
14. Calvo, A. (2000). Subtipos en lectures con dificultades en el aprendizaje de la lectura [Subtypes of children with difficulties in learning to read]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia, Spain.
15. Catts, H. (1989). Defining dyslexia as a developmental language disorder. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 50-76.
16. Cole, M. (1997). Cultural mechanism of cognitive development. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development (pp. 245-263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
18. Cuetos, E, Domínguez, A., Miera, G., & de Vega, M. (1997). Diferencias individuales en el procesamiento léxico [Individual differences in lexical processing]. Estudios de Psicología, 57, 15-27.
19. Cuetos, E, & Ramos, J. L. (1997). Batería de evaluation de los procesos lectores en el alumnado del tercer ciclo de educación primaria y educación secundaria obligatoria (PROLEC-SE) [Assessment battery for reading processes in older primary and secondary students]. Madrid: TEA.
20. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
21. Domínguez Martínez, A., & Cuetos Vega, F. (1992). Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distinta competencia lectora [Development of word recognition skills in children with different reading abilities]. Cognitiva, 4, 193-208.
22. Duffy, G. C., Roehler, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., et al. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
23. Elosúa, R., García Madruga, J. A., Gárate, M., Gutiérrez, F., & Luque, J. L. (1993). Prueba de amplitud lectora [Reading span test]. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia.
24. Ellis, N. (1990). Reading, phonological skills and short-term memory: Interactive tributaries of development. Journal of Research in Reading, 13, 107-122.
25. Felton, R. H. (1992). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 212-229.
26. Fleisher, L., Jenkins, J., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30-48.
27. Frederiksen, J. R., & Warren, B. M. (1987). A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading. In R. Glaser (Eds.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Graesser, A., & Goodman, S. H. (1985). How to construct conceptual graph structures. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 363-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Graesser, A., & Britton, B. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 341-352) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Goodman, K. (1990). El lenguaje integral: Un camino fácil para el desarrollo del lenguaje [Whole language: An easy path to language development]. Lectura y Vida, 1(2), 1-13.
32. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Peer Reviewed Journal, 7(1), 6-10.
33. Hatcher, P., Hulme, C, & Ellis, A. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: the phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41-55.
34. Hernández-Valle, I., & Jiménez, J. (2001). Conciencia fonémica y retraso lector: ¿Es determinante la edad en la eficacia de la intervención? [Phonemic awareness and delay in reading: Is age a determinant of the effectiveness of intervention?]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24, 379-395.
35. Jenkins, J. R., Barksdale, A., & Clinton, L. R. (1978). Improving reading comprehension and oral reading: Generalization across behaviors, settings, and time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(10), 5-14.
36. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003a). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD Groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 237-245.
37. Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003b). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.
38. Jimenez, J. E. (1997). A reading-level design study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 23-40.
39. Joanisse, M. F., Manis, F. R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30-60.
40. Joshi, R. M., & Aarón, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85-97.
41. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
42. Klenk, L., & Kibby, M. W. (2000). Remediating reading difficulties: Appraising the past, reconciling the present, constructing the future. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 667-690). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Lovett, M. W., Borden, S. L., Deluca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N. J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer-of-learning following phonologically and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805-822.
44. Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, J. C., & Frijters, J. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334-358.
45. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468.
46. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
47. Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological recoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 235-253.
48. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
49. Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A. B., & Kreupeling, J. W. (1982). Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 771-777.
50. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461-469.
52. Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355-359.
53. Pressley, M. (1999). Cómo enseñar a leer [Reading instruction that works]. Barcelona: Paidós.
54. Pressley, M. (2000) What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The non-word reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29-53.
56. Rego, L. L. B., & Bryant, P. E. (1993). The connection between phonological, syntactic and semantic skills and children's reading and spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 235-246.
57. Roehler, L. R., & Duffy, G. G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265-280). New York: Longman.
58. Rueda, M. L, & Sánchez, E. (1996). Relación entre conocimiento fonémico y dislexia: Un estudio instruccional [Relationship between phonemic knowledge and dys-lexia: an instructional study]. Cognitiva, 8, 215-234.
59. Samuels, S. J., Dahl, P., & Archwamety, T. (1974). Effects of hypothesis/test training on reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 835-844.
60. Sánchez, E. (1998). Comprensión y redacción de textos [Comprehension and writing of texts]. Barcelona: Edebé.
61. Sánchez, E., & García, J. R. (2003). Los retos de la alfabetización: Cómo comprender lo que se lee cuando aún no se ha aprendido del todo a leer [The challenges of literacy: How to understand what one reads when one has not fully learned how to read]. Psicopedagogia: Revista da Associação Brasileira de Psicopedagogia, 20(62), 116-127.
62. Sánchez, E., García, J. R., Gonzalez, A. J. & Herrera, P. (2006). The teaching of comprehension strategies from joint reading: Proposal and evidence. Manuscript in preparation.
63. Sánchez, E., Gonzalez, A. J., & García, R. (2002). Competencia retórica: Una propuesta para interpretar las dificultades de comprensión [Rhetorical competence: A proposal for interpreting the difficulties of comprehension]. Psicothema, 14(1), 77-85.
64. Sánchez, E., Rosales, J., & Suárez, S. (1999). Interacción profesor/alumnos y comprensión de textos: Qué se hace y qué se puede hacer [Teacher/pupil interaction and text comprehension: What is done and what could be done]. Cultura y Educación, 14-15, 1-89.
65. Sánchez, E., & Rueda, M. I. (1991). Segmental awareness and dyslexia: Is it possible to learn to segment well and yet continue to read and write poorly? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 11-18.
66. Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Linguistic processes in reading and spelling: The case of alphabetic writing systems: English, French, German, and Spanish. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 43-66). Boston: Kluwer.
67. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
68. Stanovich, K. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.
69. Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24-53.
70. Swanson, H. L., & Hovell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720-734.
71. Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276-288.
72. Troia, G. A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28-52.
73. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7-26.
74. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A. W, & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51-61.
75. van den Bosch, K., van Bon, W., & Schreuder, R. (1995). Poor readers' decoding skills: Effects of training with limited exposure duration. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 110-125.
76. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
77. Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). Las dificultades de comprensión I: Diferencias en procesos de comprensión entre los lectores normales y con dificultades de comprensión [Comprehension difficulties I: Differences in comprehension processes between normal readers and those with comprehension difficulties] In A. Miranda, E. Vidal-Abarca, & M. Soriano, Evaluación e intervención psicoeducativa en dificultades de aprendizaje [Psychoeducational assessment and intervention in learning difficulties] (pp. 129-156). Madrid: Pirámide.
78. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223-238.
79. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
80. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). The development of reading related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
81. Windfuhr, K. L., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The relationship between paired associate learning and phonological skills in normally developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 160-173.
82. Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123-141.
83. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.