Pedagogical practices: Examining preservice teachers' perceptions of their abilities

Instructional Science

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 443-465

  Edwards, Maeghan N ^a   Higley, Kelli ^a   Zeruth, Jill A ^a   Murphy, P Karen ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pedagogical practices; Teacher efficacy; Teaching as persuasion

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547403534     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-006-9014-1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alexander, P. A., Fives, H., Buehl, M. M., & Mulhern, J. (2002). Persuasive pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 795-813.
2. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Guan, J., & Murphy, P. A. (1998). How students and teachers in Singapore and the United States conceptualize knowledge and beliefs: Positioning learning within epistemological frameworks. Learning and Instruction, 8, 97-116.
3. Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 413-442.
4. Armor, D., Conry-Oseguera, P., Cox, M., King, N., McDonnell, L., & Pascal, A. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
5. Ashton P. T., & Webb R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
6. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
7. Brooks, G. (n.d.). Parallel analysis program. Retrieved October 13, 2004 from http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~brooksg/edre/parallel_analysis.sps.
8. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Sperl, C. T. (2001). Profiling persuasion: The role of beliefs, knowledge, and interest in the processing of persuasive texts that vary by argument structure. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 269-301.
9. Buehl, M. M., Manning, D. K., Cox, K., & Fives, H. (2005). Exploring pre-service teachers' initial and informed reactions to persuasive pedagogy. In H. Fives (Chair), Teaching as persuasion: Is the metaphor viable? Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
10. Burke-Spero, R. (1999). Toward a model of 'civitas' through an ethic of care: A qualitative study of preservice teachers' perceptions about learning to teach diverse populations. Ohio State University, Columbus: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
11. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
12. Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778-807.
13. Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Reframing the process of conceptual change: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
14. Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2001). Distinguishing between understanding and belief. Theory into Practice, 40, 235-241.
15. Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1999). Persuasion, learning, and conceptual change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
16. Fives, H., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Persuasion as a metaphor for teaching: A case in point. Theory into Practice, 40, 242-248.
17. Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 675-86.
18. Fritz, J. J., Miller-Heyl, J., Kreutzer, J. C., & MacPhee, D. (1995). Fostering personal teaching efficacy through staff development and classroom activities. Journal of Educational Research, 88, 200-208.
19. Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers' cognition and appraisal process during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 117-155.
20. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-461.
21. Guzzetti, B. (2000). Learning counter-intuitive science concepts: What have we learned from over a decade of research? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(2), 89-98.
22. Henson, R. K. (2002). From adolescent angst to adulthood: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas in the development of teacher efficacy research. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 137-150.
23. Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
24. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
25. Jackson, S., & Allen, M. (1987). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of one-sided and two- sided argumentation. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
26. Johnson, B. T. (1994). Effects of outcome-relevant involvement and prior information on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 556-579.
27. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2004) LISREL (Version 8.71) [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
28. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
29. Linn, R. L. (1968). A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem. Psychometrika, 38, 37-72.
30. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2002) Teachers' beliefs and behaviours: What really matters? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 37(2), 3-15.
31. Murphy, P. K. (2001). Persuasive pedagogy: A new metaphor for a new decade. Theory into Practice, 40, 224-227.
32. Murphy, P. K. (Chair) (2005). Examining the hinge: The influence of epistemological beliefs in conceptual change. Montreal, Canada: Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
33. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version with Singaporean females: Examining psychometric properties. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 493-510.
34. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2004). Persuasion as a dynamic multidimensional process: An investigation of individual differences and intraindividual differences. American Educational Research Association, 41, 337-363.
35. Murphy, P. K., Edwards, M. N., Buehl, M. M., & Zeruth, J. A. (in press). Using the Domain-Specific Beliefs Questionnaire with adolescents enrolled in high-poverty, high-minority schools: Examining psychometric properties. Journal of Experimental Education.
36. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
37. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
38. Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Sawyer, B. E. (2004). Primary grade teachers' self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes toward teaching, and discipline and teaching practice priorities in relation to the responsive classroom approach. The Elementary School Journal, 104(4), 321-341.
39. Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17, 51-65.
40. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
41. Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
43. Sinatra, G. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2004). Teacher candidates' epistemological beliefs, dispositions, and views on persuasive pedagogy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 483-498.
44. Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
46. Stevens, T., & Fives, H. (2005). Teaching as persuasion online? Transferring the pedagogy to online settings. In H. Fives (Chair), Teaching as persuasion: Is the metaphor viable? Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
47. Stiff, J. B. (1994). Persuasive communication. New York: The Guilford Press.
48. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-305.
49. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
50. Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F., & Linn, L. R. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 34, 421-460.
51. Waggoner, M. A., Chinn, C., Yi, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1995). Collaborative Reasoning stories. Language Arts, 72, 582-588.
52. Weng, L. (2004). Impact of the number of response categories and anchor labels on coefficient alpha and test-retest reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 956-972.
53. Wood, W., & Kallgren, C. A. (1988). Communicator attributes and persuasion: Recipients' access to attitude-relevant information in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 172-182.
54. Woods, B. S., & Murphy, P. K. (2001). Separated at birth: The shared lineage of research on conceptual change and persuasion. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 633-649.
55. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1984). Comparison of five results for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.