Sugar-assisted ligation in glycoprotein synthesis

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 7690-7701

  Yang, Yu Ying ^a   Ficht, Simon ^a   Brik, Ashraf ^a,c   Wong, Chi Huey ^a,b  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GENOMICS RESEARCH CENTER   (Taiwan)

^c BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETAMIDOMETHYL; GLYCOPEPTIDES; LIGATION; NATIVE CHEMICAL LIGATION (NCL);

DESULFURIZATION; HYDROGENOLYSIS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

GLYCOPROTEINS;

ACETAMIDINE DERIVATIVE; AMINO ACID; CYSTEINE; DIPTERICIN EPSILON; GLYCOPEPTIDE; GLYCOPROTEIN; SUGAR; THIOESTER; THIOL; THIOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CATALYST; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DESULFURIZATION; GLYCOPROTEIN SYNTHESIS; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROGENOLYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION;

CARBOHYDRATE CONFORMATION; CARBOHYDRATES; GLYCOPROTEINS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 34250850156     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0708971     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Apweiler, R.; Hermjakob, H.; Sharon, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1473, 4-8.
2. (a) Dwek, R. A.; Butters, T. D.; Platt, F. M.; Zitzmann, N. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 65-75.
3. (b) Spiro, R. G. Glycobiology 2002, 12, 43-56.
4. (c) Graffenried, C. L. D.; Bertozzi, C. R. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16, 356-363.
5. (d) Sinclair, A. M.; Elliott, S. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 94, 1626-1635.
6. (a) Sears, P. Science 2001, 291, 2344-2350.
7. (b) Xu, R.; Hanson, S. R.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Schultz, P. G.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15654-15655.
8. (c) Hamilton, S. R., et al. Science 2006, 313, 1441-1443.
9. (d) Li, H., et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 210-215.
10. (a) Davis, B. G. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 579-602.
11. (b) Guo, Z.; Shao, N. Med. Res. Rev. 2005, 25, 655-678.
12. (c) Pratt, M. R.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 58-68.
13. (d) Brik, A.; Ficht, S.; Wong, C.-H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006, 10, 638-644.
14. (a) Shin, Y.; Winans, K. A.; Backes, B. J.; Kent, S. B. H.; Ellman, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 21, 11684-11689.
15. (b) Koeller, K. M.; Smith, M. E. B.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 742-743.
16. (c) Mcmillan, D.; Bertozzi, C. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1355-1359.
17. (d) Hackenberger, C. P. R.; Friel, C. T.; Radford, S. E.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12882-12889.
18. (e) Li, B.; Song, H.; Hauser, S.; Wang, L.-X. Org. Lett 2006, 8, 3081-3084.
19. (a) Dawson, P. E.; Muir, T. W.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Kent, S. B. H. Science 1994, 266, 776-779.
20. (b) Dawson, P. E.; Kent, S. B. H. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 923-960.
21. (c) Marcaurelle, L. A.; Mizoue, L. S.; Wilken, J.; Oldhm, L.; Kent, S. B. H.; Hndel, T. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1129-1132.
22. (a) Muir, T. W.; Sondhi, D.; Cole, P. A. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 6705-6710.
23. (b) Muralidharan, V.; Muir, T. W. Nature Methods 2006, 3, 429-438.
24. (c) Tolbert, T. J.; Franke, D.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 909-915.
25. (a) Beligere, G. S.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6332-6333.
26. (b) Yan, L. Z.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 526-533.
27. (c) Bang, D.; Makhatadze, V. T.; Kossiakoff, A. A.; Kent, S. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3852-3856.
28. (d) Macmillan, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7668-7672.
29. (a) Cane, L. E.; Bark, S. J.; Kent, S. B. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5891-5896.
30. (b) Low, D. W.; Hill, M. G.; Carrasco, M. R.; Kent, S. B. H.; Botti, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 6554-6559.
31. (c) Offer, J.; Boddy, C.; Dawson, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4642-4646.
32. (d) Macmillan, D.; Anderson, D. W. Org, Lett. 2004, 6, 4659-4662.
33. (e) Wu, B.; Chen, J.; Warren, J. D.; Chen, G.; Hua, Z.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4116-4125.
34. (f) Chen, J.; Chen, G.; Wu, B.; Wan, Q.; Tan, Z.; Hua, Z.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8013-8016.
35. (a) Brik, A.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Ficht, S.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5626-5627.
36. (b) Brik, A.; Ficht, S.; Yang, Y.-Y.; Bennett, C. S.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15026-15033.
37. Molecular simulations of transition states have been performed and will be presented in a following publication. The simulations support the hypothesis that the restricted conformation of the sugar helps to preorganize the GalNAc-linked thioester intermediate and N-terminal amine for nucleophilic attack.
38. Bulet, P.; Hegy, G.; Lambert, J.; Dorsselaer, A. V.; Hoffmann, J. A.; Hetru, C. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 7394-7400.
39. (a) Winans, K. A.; King, D. S.; Rao, V. R.; Bertozzi, C. R. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 11799-11710.
40. (b) Cudic, M.; Bulet, P.; Hoffmann, R.; Craik, D. J.; Otvos, L., Jr. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 266, 549-558.
41. (a) Hanisch, F.-G. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382, 143-149.
42. (b) Hang, H. C.; Bertozzi, C. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 5021-5034.
43. Koeller, K. M.; Smith, M. E. B.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1017-1026.
44. Schultz, M.; Kunz, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5319-5322.
45. Kupihar, Z.; Schmel, Z.; Kele, Z.; Penke, B.; Kovacs, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 1241-1247.
46. Albericio, F.; Carpino, L. A. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 289, 104-126.
47. Ciommer, M.; Kunz, H. Synlett 1991, 8, 593-595.
48. Wellings, D. A.; Atherton, E. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 289, 44-67.
49. (a) Alewood, P.; Alewood, D.; Miranda, L.; Love, S.; Meutermans, W.; Wilson, D. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 289, 14-29.
50. (b) Stewart, J. M. Methods Enzymol. 1997, 289, 29-44.
51. 1/2(h) for the Gly-Val junction for which the ligation efficiency is more susceptible to varying the reaction conditions: 18 h for N-linked glycopeptides (6 M Gn·HCl, 0.1 M PBS, 2% PhSH, glycopeptide (1.2 equiv), peptide thioester (1 equiv)); 14 h for α-O-linked glycopeptides (6 M Gn·HCl, 0.1 M PBS, glycopeptide (1 equiv), peptide thioester (1.2 equiv)).
52. The initial pH of the buffer used for SAL is 8.5. After addition of the peptides, the pH drops due to the residual TFA present in HPLC purified peptides. As a consequence, in some cases, triethanolamine was added to adjust the reaction pH to the ideal range 7.2-7.4.
53. 82 by LC/MS. The first observation of this degraded fragment was in the crude glycopeptide cleaved from the resin. In the beginning of the ligation, the amount of this degraded fragment is less than 5%. However, its amount increased during the course of the reaction. A similar degradation phenomenon was not observed for the short glycopeptides (Table 1).
54. (a) Warren, J. D.; Miller, J. S.; Keding, S. J.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6576-6578.
55. (b) Mezzato, S.; Schaffrath, M.; Unverzagt, C.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1650-1654.
56. 36. Alternatively, an orthogonal protecting group could be used to avoid this side reaction (Villain, M.; Gaertner, H.; Botti, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 3267-3272).
57. Wang, P.; Miranda, L. P. Int. J. Pept. Res. Therap. 2005, 11, 117-123.
58. Ye, X.-S.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2410-2431.
59. Takahashi, S.; Kuzuhara, H.; Nakajima, M. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6915-6926.
60. tBu)-(Hmb)Gly-OH in SPPS failed due to the difficulty of complete removal of the Hmb group in the final global deprotection step.
61. Ingale, S.; Buskas, T.; Boons, G.-J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5785-5788.
62. 3 was used as the catalyst. This indicates that even better desulfurization selectivity might be achieved if different catalysts, like Raney nickel, or other conditions were used to selectively desulfurize the thiol handle in the presence of Cys(Acm) residues.
63. Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. Nature 2007, 445, 31-33.