Using instructional logs to study mathematics curriculum and teaching in the early grades

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 103-127

  Rowan, Brian ^a   Harrison, Delena M ^a   Hayes, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044233581     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/428812     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Becker, J., & Morganthaler, L. (Eds.). (1998). Math trailblazers. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
2. Berends, M., Bodilly, S., & Kirby, S. N. (2002). Looking back over a decade of whole-school reform: The experience of new American schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 168-175.
3. Brewer, D. J., & Stasz, C. (1996). Enhancing opportunity to learn measures in NCES data. In G. Hoachlander, J. E. Griffith, & J. H. Ralph (Eds.), From data to information: New directions for the National Center for Education Statistics (pp. 3-1 to 3-28) (NCES 96-901). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
4. Burstein, L., McDonnell, L., Van Winkle, J., Ormseth, T., Mirocha, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Validating national curriculum indicators. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
5. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. (2000). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Correnti, R., Rowan, B., & Camburn, E. (2003, April). School reform programs, literacy practices in third-grade classrooms, and instructional effects on student achievement: Notes from the first year of A Study of Instructional Improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
7. Cory, B. (Ed.). (1995). Investigations in number, data, and space. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.
8. Datnow, A. (2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 357-374.
9. Flanders, J. R. (1987). How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new? Arithmetic Teacher, 35, 18-23.
10. Fuson, K. C., Stigler, J. W., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Brief report: Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 449-456.
11. Henke, R. R., Chen, X., & Goldman, G. (1999). What happens in classrooms? Instructional practices in elementary and secondary schools: 1994-95. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(2), 7-13.
12. Hill, H. C. (2003). Content across communities: Validating measures of elementary mathematics instruction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Hilton, M. (1989). A comparison of a prospective diary and two summary recall techniques for recording alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 1085-1092.
14. Hoppe, M., Gillmore, M., Valadez, D., Civic, D., Hartway, J., & Morrison, D. (2000). The relative costs and benefits of telephone interviews versus self-administered diaries for daily data collection. Evaluation Review, 24(1), 102-116.
15. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Knapp, M. S., & Shields, P. M. (Eds.). (1990). Better schooling for the children of poverty: Alternatives to conventional wisdom: Vol. 2. Commissioned papers and literature review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17. Leigh, B., Gillmore, M., & Morrison, D. (1998). Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(2), 119-127.
18. Lemmens, P., Knibbe, R., & Tan, F. (1988). Weekly recall and diary estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 49, 131-135.
19. Lemmens, P., Tan, E., & Knibbe, R. (1992). Measuring quantity and frequency of drinking in a general population survey: A comparison of five indices. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 476-486.
20. Mayer, D. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45.
21. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer and Associates (Eds.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Mullens, J., & Kasprzyk, D. (1996). Using qualitative methods to validate quantitative survey instruments. In 1996 Proceedings of the Section of Survey Research Methods (pp. 638-643). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
23. Mullens, J., & Kasprzyk, D. (1999). Validating item response on self-report teacher survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 1606, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
25. Porter, A. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: The case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher, 18(5), 9-15.
26. Raudenbush, S., & Byrk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2d ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
28. Rowan, B. (in press). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change.
29. Rowan, B., Camburn, E., & Correnti, R. (2002, April). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum in large-scale surveys: Insights from the Study of Instructional Improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
30. Rowan, B., Camburn, E., & Correnti, R. (2004). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum: A study of literacy teaching in third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 105, 75-101.
31. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
32. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Cogan, L. S., Jakwerth, P. M., & Houang, R. T. (1999). Facing the consequences: Using TIMSS for a closer look at mathematics and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Burstein, L. (1986). Measurement of teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3d ed., pp. 50-91). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
35. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1991). State control of the curriculum and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 64, 1-10.
36. Stigler, J. W., & Heibert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
37. Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (1999). Everyday mathematics. DeSoto, TX: McGraw-Hill.