Forces and bond dynamics in cell adhesion

Science

Volumn 316, Issue 5828, 2007, Pages 1148-1153

  Evans, Evan A ^a,b   Calderwood, David A ^c  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BIOCHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; SIGNALING;

CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CYTOCHEMISTRY; DYNAMICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FORCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

BIOMECHANICS; CELL ADHESION; HUMANS; INTEGRINS; SELECTINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249936024     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1137592     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. X. Chen, B. M. Gumbiner, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 572 (2006).
2. R. P. McEver, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 581 (2002).
3. M. R. King, V. Heinrich, E. Evans, D. A. Hammer, Biophys. J. 88, 1676 (2005).
4. B. T. Marshall et al., Nature 423, 190 (2003).
5. B. M. Gumbiner, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 622 (2005).
6. D. Leckband, A. Prakasam, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 8, 259 (2006).
7. W. He, P. Cowin, D. L. Stokes, Science 302, 109 (2003).
8. R. O. Hynes, Cell 110, 673 (2002).
9. G. Jiang, G. Giannone, D. R. Critchley, E. Fukumoto, M. P. Sheetz, Nature 424, 334 (2003).
10. M. Sixt, M. Bauer, T. Lämmermann, R. Fässler, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 482 (2006).
11. M. A. Arnaout, B. Mahalingam, X. P. Xiong, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 381 (2005).
12. B. H. Luo, T. A. Springer, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 579 (2006).
13. D. A. Calderwood, J. Cell Sci. 117, 657 (2004).
14. S. Liu, D. A. Calderwood, M. H. Ginsberg, J. Cell Sci. 113, 3563 (2000).
15. B. Geiger, A. Bershadsky, R. Pankov, K. M. Yamada, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 793 (2001).
16. D. A. Calderwood et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2272 (2003).
17. G. Giannone, M. P. Sheetz, Trends Cell Biol. 16, 213 (2006).
18. B. Garcia-Alvarez et al., Mol. Cell 11, 49 (2003).
19. T. Kiema et al., Mol. Cell 21, 337 (2006).
20. D. A. Calderwood, M. H. Ginsberg, Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 694 (2003).
21. S. Tadokoro et al., Science 302, 103 (2003).
22. G. Giannone, G. Jiang, D. H. Sutton, D. R. Critchley, M. P. Sheetz, J. Cell Biol. 163, 409 (2003).
23. W. H. Ziegler, R. C. Liddington, D. R. Critchley, Trends Cell Biol. 16, 453 (2006).
24. A. J. Engler, S. Sen, H. L. Sweeney, D. E. Discher, Cell 126, 677 (2006).
25. M. J. Paszek et al., Cancer Cell 8, 241 (2005).
26. B. Geiger, A. Bershadsky, Cell 110, 139 (2002).
27. A. W. Orr, B. P. Helmke, B. R. Blackman, M. A. Schwartz, Dev. Cell 10, 11 (2006).
28. R. Alon, M. L. Dustin, Immunity 26, 17 (2007).
29. V. Vogel, M. P. Sheetz, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265(2006).
30. C. V. Carman, T. A. Springer, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 547 (2003).
31. E. Tzima et al., Nature 437, 426 (2005).
32. Y. Sawada et al., Cell 127, 1015 (2006).
33. B. N. G. Giepmans, S. R. Adams, M. H. Ellisman, R. Y. Tsien, Science 312, 217 (2006).
34. C. M. Brown et al., J. Cell Sci. 119, 5204 (2006).
35. K. Hu, K. T. Applegate, G. Danuser, C. M. Waterman-Storer, Science 315, 111 (2007).
36. M. Sotomayor, K. Schulten, Science 316, 1144 (2007).
37. E. Evans, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct 30, 105 (2001).
38. G. I. Bell, Science 200, 618 (1978).
39. o reported for spontaneous dissociation of ligand/receptor bonds range from a fraction of a second to 100 s or more.
40. -10 g wt).
41. C. Wüfing, M. M. Davis, Science 282, 2266 (1998).
42. E. Evans, K. Ritchie, Biophys. J. 72, 1541 (1997).
43. β), suggesting that the energy landscape changes to increase the length gained in the direction of force when the bond breaks.
44. Advanced computational methods like the "steered molecular dynamics" described in the companion review by Sotomayor and Schulten (36) provide valuable tools for investigating how variations in chemical structure affect activation energy barriers and pathways governing bond strength.
45. f (pN/nm) to report the force history f(t). Bond events are identified by the cycles showing periods of probe stretch ending in precipitous recoil, as sketched in Fig. 2A.
46. E. Evans, A. Leung, V. Heinrich, C. Zhu, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 11281 (2004).
47. E. Evans, K. Kinoshita, in Methods in Cell Biology: Cell Mechanics, Vol. 83, Y. L. Wang, D. E. Discher, Eds. (Elsevier, New York, 2007), chap. 16.
48. E. Perret, A. Leung, H. Feracci, E. Evans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 16472 (2004).
49. M. V. Bayas, A. Leung, E. Evans, D. Leckband, Biophys. J. 90, 1385 (2006).
50. rf). It is important to note that different cell types possess very different levels of interfacial stiffness and that these levels often change with cell activation or spreading on a stiffer substrate.
51. As lipid material flows onto a tether, bilayer-spanning proteins (especially those that interact with the cytoskeleton) are expected to remain behind in the cell membrane. However, the acylated proteins bound weakly to the bilayer could build up at the base of the tether, causing some to be expelled from the surface when approaching the tether-cell junction.
52. V. Heinrich, A. Leung, E. Evans, Biophys. J. 88, 2299 (2005).
53. E. Evans, V. Heinrich, A. Leung, K. Kinoshita, Biophys. J. 88, 2288 (2005).
54. Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health.