Lifetime measurements reveal kinetic differences between homophilic cadherin bonds

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1385-1395

  Bayas, Marco V ^a   Leung, Andrew ^a   Evans, Evan ^a,b   Leckband, Deborah ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CADHERIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; XENOPUS PROTEIN;

ADHESION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DISSOCIATION; ENERGY; EPITHELIUM; KINETICS; MEASUREMENT; PROTEIN DOMAIN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CHO CELL; CRICETULUS; ERYTHROCYTE; HAMSTER; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CADHERINS; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; ERYTHROCYTES; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 33645760748     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.069583     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Takeichi, M. 1995. Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:619-627.
2. Gumbiner, B. M. 1996. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell. 84:345-357.
3. Takeichi, M. 1990. Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell-cell adhesion. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:237-252.
4. Shapiro, L., A. M. Fannon, P. D. Kwong, A. Thompson, M. S. Lehmann, G. Grubel, J.-F. Legrand, J. Als-Nielsen, D. R. Colman, and W. A. Hendrickson. 1995. Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by cadherins. Nature. 374:327-337.
5. Nagar, B., M. Overduin, M. Ikura, and J. M. Rini. 1996. Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature. 380:360-364.
6. Tamura, K., W.-S. Shan, W. A. Hendrickson, D. R. Colman, and L. Shapiro. 1998. Structure-function analysis of cell adhesion by neural (N-) cadherin. Neuron. 20:1153-1163.
7. 2+ dependence and mutational analysis reveal molecular details of E-cadherin homoassociation. EMBO J. 18:1738-1747.
8. Boggon, T. J., J. Murray, S. Chappuis-Flament, E. Wong, B. M. Gumbiner, and L. Shapiro. 2002. C-Cadherin ectodomain structure and implications for cell adhesion mechanisms. Science. 296:1308-1313.
9. Häussinger, D., T. Ahrens, H.-J. Sass, O. Pertz, J. Engel, and S. Grzesiek. 2002. Calcium-dependent homoassociation of E-cadherin by NMR spectroscopy: changes in mobility, conformation and mapping of contact regions. J. Mol. Biol. 324:823-839.
10. He, W., P. Cowin, and D. L. Stokes. 2003. Untangling desmosomal knots with electron tomography. Science. 302:823-839.
11. Häussinger, D., T. Ahrens, T. Aberle, J. Engel, J. Stetefeld, and S. Grzesiek. 2004. Proteolytic E-cadherin activation followed by solution NMR and x-ray crystallography. EMBO J. 23:1699-1708.
12. Harrison, O. J., E. M. Corps, T. Berge, and P. J. Kilshaw. 2005. The mechanism of cell adhesion by classical cadherins: the role of domain 1. J. Cell Sci. 118:711-721.
13. Takeichi, M. 1991. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science. 251:1451-1455.
14. Nose, A., K. Tsuji, and M. Takeichi. 1990. Localization of specificity determining states in cadherin cell adhesion molecules. Cell. 61:147-155.
15. Niessen, C. M., and B. M. Gumbiner. 2002. Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity. J. Cell Biol. 156:389-399.
16. Sivasankar, S., W. Brieher, N. Lavrik, B. Gumbiner, and D. Leckband. 1999. Direct molecular force measurements of multiple adhesive interactions between cadherin ectodomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:11820-11824.
17. Sivasankar, S., B. M. Gumbiner, and D. Leckband. 2001. Direct measurements of multiple adhesive alignments and unbinding trajectories between cadherin extracellular domains. Biophys. J. 80:1758-1768.
18. Zhu, B., S. Chappuis-Flament, E. Wong, I. E. Jensen, B. M. Gumbiner, and D. Leckband. 2003. Functional analysis of the structural basis of homophilic cadherin adhesion. Biophys. J. 84:4033-4042.
19. Chappuis-Flament, S., E. Wong, L. D. Hicks, C. M. Kay, and B. M. Gumbiner. 2001. Multiple cadherins extracellular repeats mediate homophilic binding and adhesion. J. Cell Biol. 154:231-243.
20. Perret, E., A. Leung, H. Feracci, and E. Evans. 2004. Trans-bonded pairs of E-cadherin exhibit a remarkable hierarchy of mechanical strengths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:16472-16477.
21. Levi, G., D. Ginsberg, J. Girault, I. Sabanay, J. P. Thiery, and B. Geiger. 1991. EP-Cadherin in muscles and epithelia of Xenopus laevis embryos. Development. 113:1335-1344.
22. Lee, C.-H., and B. Gumbiner. 1995. Disruption of gastrulation movements in Xenopus by a dominant-negative mutant for C-cadherin. Dev. Biol. 171:363-373.
23. Evans, E., K. Ritchie, and R. Merkel. 1995. Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys. J. 68:2580-2587.
24. Evans, E., A. Leung, D. Hammer, and S. Simon. 2001. Chemically distinct transition states govern rapid dissociation of single L-selectin bonds under force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:3784-3789.
25. Bell, G. I. 1978. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 200:618-627.
26. Evans, E. 2001. Probing the relation between force-lifetime and chemistry in single molecular bonds. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:105-128.
27. Bates, D. M., and D. G. Watts. 1988. Non-Linear Regression Analysis and its Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
28. Duguay, D., R. A. Foty, and M. S. Steinberg. 2003. Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants. Dev. Biol. 253:309-323.
29. Swift, D. L., S. Friedlander, and K. Friedlander. 1964. The coagulation of hydrosols by Brownian motion and laminar shear flow. J. Colloid Sci. 19:621-647.
30. Dembo, M., D. C. Torney, K. Saxman, and D. Hammer. 1988. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 234:55-83.
31. Hammer, D. A., and S. M. Apte. 1992. Simulation of cell rolling and adhesion on surfaces in shear flow: general results and analysis of selectin-mediated neutrophil adhesion. Biophys. J. 63:35-57.
32. Goldsmith, H. L., T. A. Quinn, G. Drury, C. Spanos, F. A. McIntosh, and S. I. Simon. 2001. Dynamics of neutrophil aggregation in Couette flow revealed by videomicroscopy: effect of shear rate on two-body collision efficiency and doublet lifetime. Biophys. J. 81:2020-2034.
33. Bayas, M. V., K. Schulten, and D. Leckband. 2004. Forced dissociation of the strand dimmer interface between C-cadherin ectodomains. Mech. Chem. Biosys. 1:101-111.
34. Baumgartner, W., P. Hinterdorfer, W. Ness, A. Raab, D. Vestweber, H. Schindler, and D. Drenckhahn. 2000. Cadherin interaction probed by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:4005-4010.
35. Perret, E., A.-M. Benoliel, P. Nassoy, A. Pierres, V. Delmas, J.-P. Thiery, P. Bongrand, and H. Feracci. 2002. Fast dissociation kinetics between individual E-cadherin fragments revealed by flow chamber analysis. EMBO J. 21:2537-2546.
36. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD - visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.