Development of the sensory processing measureschool: Initial studies of reliability and validity

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 170-175

  Miller Kuhaneck, Heather ^a   Henry, Diana A ^b   Glennon, Tara J ^c,d   Mu, Keli ^e  

^a SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Henry OT Services

^c QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Creighton University ^*  (United States)

^e CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pediatric; Praxis; Sensory integration; Sensory processing; Sensory processing measure school (SPM school)

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PEDIATRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; UNITED STATES;

CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PEDIATRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOLS; SENSATION DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249654985     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.170     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ahn, R. R., Miller, L. J., Milberger, S., & McIntosh, D. N. (2004). Prevalence of parents' perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 287-293.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association. (1995). Position paper: Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 1015-1018.
3. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2002). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 609-639.
4. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
5. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
6. Ayres, A. J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
7. Barnes, K. J., & Turner, K. D. (2001). Team collaborative practices between teachers and occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 83-89.
8. Baum, C. M., & Christiansen, C. (2004). Person-environment- occupation-performance: An occupation-based framework for practice. In C. Christiansen, C. M. Baum, & J. B. Haugen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being (pp. 242-267). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
9. Benson, J., & Clark, F. (1982). A guide for instrument development and validation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 789-800.
10. Bonder, B. R. (1989). Planning the initial version. In L. Miller (Ed.), Developing norm referenced standardized tests (pp. 15-39). New York: Haworth Press.
11. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (1991). Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Toronto, Ontario: Author.
12. Case-Smith, J. (1997). Variables related to successful school-based practice. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 17, 133-153.
13. Clark, G. F., & Coster, W. J. (1998). Evaluation/problem solving and program evaluation. In J. Case-Smith (Ed.), Occupational therapy: Making a difference in school system practice (pp. 1/1-1/46). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
14. Clark, G. F., & Miller, L. E. (1996). Providing effective occupational therapy services: Data-based decision making in school-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 701-708.
15. Coster, W., Deeney, T, Haltiwanger, J., & Haley, S. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
16. Dunn, W. (1999). Sensory Profile: User's manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
17. Dunn, W. (2000). Best practice occupational therapy assessment. In W. Dunn (Ed.), Best practice occupational therapy in community service with children and families (pp. 79-108). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
18. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. Pub. L. 94-142, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 a seq.
19. Glennon, T. J., Henry, D. A., & Kuhaneck, H. M. (2003, June). The School Assessment of Sensory Integration (SASI): A practice framework assessment tool. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference & Expo of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Washington, DC.
20. Glennon, T. J., Henry, D. A., & Kuhaneck, H. M. (2004, May). The School Assessment of Sensory Integration (SASI): Fostering best practice in school-based therapy. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Conference & Expo of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Minneapolis, MN.
21. Glennon, T. J., Henry, D. A., & Kuhaneck, H. M. (2005, May). School Assessment of Sensory Integration: Applications for school and clinic therapists. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Conference & Expo of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Long Beach, CA.
22. Glennon, T. J., Henry, D. A., Kuhaneck, H. M., Parharn, L. D., & Ecker, C. (May, 2006). Sensory Processing Measure-School Form: Meeting the needs of school-based therapists. Paper presented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Expo of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Charlotte, NC.
23. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990. Pub. 101-476, 20 U.S.C., Ch 33.
24. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. Pub. L. 105-117.
25. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004. Pub. L. 108-448.
26. Kemmis, B. L., & Dunn, W. (1996). Collaborative consultation: The efficacy of remedial and compensatory interventions in school contexts. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 709-717.
27. Kielhofner, G. (2004). Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
28. Law, M., Baum, C., & Dunn, W. (2000). Measuring occupational performance: A guide to best practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
29. Lemery, K. S., Goldsmith, H. H., Linnert, M. D., & Mrazek, D. A. (1999). Developmental models of infant and childhood temperament. Developmental Psychology, 35, 189-204.
30. Mancini, M. C., & Coster, W. J. (2004). Functional predictors of school participation by children with disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 11, 12-25.
31. Muhlenhaupt, M. (2003). Enabling student participation through occupational therapy services in the schools. In L. Letts, P. Rigby, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Using environments to enable occupational performance (pp. 177-196). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
32. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. 107-110.
33. Orr, C., & Schkade, J. (1997). The impact of the classroom environment on defining function in school-based practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 64-69.
34. Parham, L. D. (1998). The relationship of sensory integrative development to achievement in elementary students: Four-year longitudinal patterns. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 18, 105-127.
35. Parham, L. D., & Ecker, C. (2000). Evaluation of Sensory Processing. Unpublished test, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
36. Pedlow, R., Sanson, A., Prior, M., & Oberklaid, F. (1993). Stability of maternally reported temperament from infancy to 8 years. Developmental Psychology, 29, 998-1007.
37. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2000). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38. Roley, S. S., Clark, G. F., Bissell, J., & Brayman, S. J. (2003). Applying sensory integration framework in educationally related occupational therapy practice (2003 Statement). American Journal of Occupational Thempy, 57, 652-659.
39. Stark, S. L., & Sanford, J. A. (2004). Environmental enablers and their impact on occupational performance. In C. Christiansen, C. M. Baum, & J. B. Haugen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being (pp. 298-337). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
40. Storch, B. A., & Eskow, K. G. (1996). Theory application by school-based occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 662-668.
41. Swinth, Y., & Muhlenhaupt, M. (2004). Evaluation of occupational performance in school-based practice. In Y. Swinth (Ed.), Occupational therapy in school-based practice: Contemporary issues and trends (Lesson 4). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.