Fractured incisors: A judicious restorative approach - Part 2

International Dental Journal

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 100-108

  Brambilla, G P M ^a,b   Cavalle E ^a,c  

^a NONE

^b NONE   (Italy)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental trauma; Direct composites; Fractured incisors; Porcelain veneers; Reattachment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247484325     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2007.tb00445.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Zerman N, Cavalieri G. Traumatic injuries to permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993 9: 61-64.
2. Castro JC et al. Analysis of the crown fractures and crown-root fractures due to dental trauma assisted by the Integrated Clinic from 1992 to 2002. Dent Traumatol 2005 21: 121-126.
3. Cortes MI et al. Impact of traumatic injuries to the permanent teeth on the oral health-related quality of life in 12-14-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002 30: 193-198.
4. Rapelli G et al. Restoration of anterior teeth with indirect composite partial coverage crowns: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004 92: 519-522.
5. Farik B et al. Drying and rewetting anterior crown fragments prior to bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999 15: 113-116.
6. Hashimoto M et al. Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding agents. J Dent 2002 30: 99-105.
7. Diaz-Arnold AM et al. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 135-141.
8. Sung EC et al. Effect of irrigating solutions on dentin bonding agents and restorative shear bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 628-632.
9. Hashimoto M et al. Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on round enamel. Ear J Oral Sci 2003 111: 447-453.
10. Hashimoto M et al. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res 2002 81: 74-78.
11. Rosenstiel SF et al. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998 80: 280-301.
12. Rueggeberg FA et al. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure resin composite. Op Dent 1994 19: 26-32.
13. Magne P et al. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1999 82: 669-679.
14. Aboush YE. Removing saliva contamination from porcelain veneers before bonding J Prostbet Dent 1998 80: 649-653.
15. Rueggeberg FA et al. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure resin composite. Op Dent 1994 19: 26-32.
16. Rapelli G et al. Clinical procedures for the immediate reattachment of a tooth fragment. Dent Traumatol 2002 18: 281-284.
17. Reis A et al. Reattachment of fractured teeth: a review of literature regarding techniques and materials. Op Dent 2004 29: 226-233.
18. Lehl G, Luthra R. Reattachment of fractured fragments of maxillary central incisors - report of a case. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2004 22: 54-55.
19. Hedge RJ. Tooth fragment reattachment - an esthetic alternative: report of a case. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2003 21: 117-119.
20. DA Terry. Adhesive reattachment of a tooth fragment: the biological restoration. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003 15: 403-409.
21. Dimri M et al. Reattachment of a fractured non-vital central incisor fragment: a case report J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2000 18: 108-110.
22. Barattieri LN, Monteiro S Jr Andrada MAC. Tooth fracture re-attachment: Case reports. Quint Int 1990 21: 261-270.
23. Sengun A et al. Shear bond strength of tooth fragments reattached or restored. J Oral Rehabil 2003 30: 82-86.
24. Ferrari M et al. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992 12: 407-413.
25. Walzer M. Fractured-tooth fragment re-attachment. Gen Dent 1996 44: 434-436.
26. Reis A et al. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: Fracture strength using different techniques. Op Dent 2001 26: 287-294.
27. Simonsen RJ. Restoration of a fractured central incisor using original tooth fragment. J. Am Dent Ass 1982 105: 646-648.
28. Franco EB et al.Re-attachment of a fractured fragment to a tooth, using the acid etch technique. A case report. Estomatologia e culture 1985 15: 47-50.
29. Barattieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Andrada MAC. Esthetics: direct adhesive restorations on fractured anterior teeth, pp 135-205. Chicago: Quint. Books, 1998.
30. Dimri M et al. Reattachment of a fractured non-vital central incisor fragment a case report J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2000 18: 108-110.
31. Davis MJ et al. Marginal integrity of adhesive fracture restorations: Chamfer versus bevel. Quint Int 1983 14:: 1135-1146.
32. Peumans M et al. The 5-year clinical performance of direct composite additions to correct tooth form and position: Esthetic qualities. Clin. Or Invest 1997 1: 12-18.
33. Andreasen FM et al. Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: A multicenter clinical study. Quint Int 1995 26: 669-681.
34. Osborne JW, Lambert RL. Re-attachment of fractured incisal tooth segment. Gen Dent 1985 33: 516-517.
35. Andreasen FM et al. Bonding of enamel-dentin crown fragments after crown fracture. An experimental study using bonding agents. Ended Dent Traumatol 1993 9: 111-114.
36. Dean JA et al. Attachment of anterior tooth fragment. Ped Dent 1986 8: 139-143.
37. Worthington RB et al. Incisal edge re-attachment: The effect of preparation utilization and design. Quint Int 1999 30: 637-643.
38. Farik B et al. Adhesive bonding of fragmented anterior teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998 14: 119-123.
39. Farik B et al. Impact strength of teeth restored by fragment-bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000 16: 151-153.
40. De Sanctis R et al. Mechanical strength of tooth fragment re-at tachment. J. Biomedical Mat Res 2001 55: 629-636.
41. Farik B et al. Fracture strength of fragment-bonded teeth. Effect of calcium hydroxide before bonding. Am] Dent 2000 13: 98-100.
42. Murchison DP, Worthington KB. Incisal edge re-attachment: Literature review and treatment perspective. Camp Gont Educ 1998 19: 731-744.
43. Farik B et al. Drying and rewetting anterior crown fragments prior to bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999 15: 113-116.
44. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997 78: 437-440.
45. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 503-509.
46. Magne P, Douglas WH. Optimization of resilience and stress distribution in porcelain veneers for the treatment of crown-fractured incisors. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999 19: 543-553.
47. Baratieri LN et al. Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite. J Prosthet Dent 2000 84: 180-184.
48. Sjogren G et al. Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramic assessed by Millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT test. J Prost Dent 2000 84: 229-236.
49. Diaz-Arnold AM et al. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81:135-11.
50. Kao E, Johnston WM. Fracture incidence on debonding of orthodontic brackets from porcelain veneer laminates. J Prosthet Dent 1999 66: 631-637.
51. Permann R et al. Bonded porcelain laminates - an alternative to anterior porcelain crowns. Stomatol 1989 86: 197-206.
52. Chen HY et al. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM and pressed ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999 82: 468-475.
53. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 652-661.
54. Murphy E et al. Retrospective study on the performance fo porcelain laminate veneers delivered by undergraduate dental students. Eur J Prosthodont Rester Dent 2005 13: 38-43.
55. Oh W et al. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002 87: 451-459.
56. Magne P et al. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prostbet Dent 1999 82: 669-679.
57. Peumans M et al. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000 28: 163-177.
58. Anglis L. To place provisional or not - that is the question. Gen Dent 1999 47: 192-194.
59. Attia A, Kern M. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns luted using two bonding methods. J Pnsthet Dent 2004 91: 247-252.
60. Rapelli G et al. Restoration of anterior teeth with indirect composite partial coverage crowns: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004 92: 519-922.
61. Malament K. "EAED Closed meeting in Capri, 2003"
62. Terry DA. Direct composite resin restoration of adolescent class IV tooth fracture: a case report. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 2000 12: 23-29.
63. De Kloet HJ, Van der Kuij P. Cosmetic dentistry: composites or porcelain? Rev Belge Med Dent 1993 48: 32-50.
64. Peyton JH. Direct restoration of anterior teeth: review of the clinical technique and case presentation. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002 14: 203-210.
65. de Castro FL et al. Effect of 2% chlorexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2003 5: 129-138.
66. Reis A et al. Re-attachment of anterior fractured teeth: Fracture strength using different materials. Op Dent 2002 27: 621-627.
67. Dean JA et al. A comparison of a hybrid light-cured glass ionomer base and liner vs a light cured resin tooth fragment attachment. Ped Dent 1998 20: 49-52.
68. Dickerson WG. Conservative re-attachment of a pulpally exposed fractured incisors. Dent Econom 1994 84: 90-91.
69. Rueggeberg FA et al. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure resin composite. Op Dent 1994 19: 26-32.
70. Sanares AM et al. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mat 2001 17: 542-556.
71. Diaz-Arnold AM et al. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 135-141.
72. Blatz MB et al. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003 89: 268-274.
73. Kamada K et al. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 1998 79: 508-513.
74. Della Bona A et al. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on tensile bond strength to a resin cement. Int J Prosthodont 2002 15: 248-253.
75. Hashimoto M et al. Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on round enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2003 111: 447-453.
76. Goracci C et al. Bonding to worn or fractured incisai edges: shear bond strength of new adesive systems. Quint Int 2004 35: 21-27.
77. Magne P, Douglas WH. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Quint Int 2000 31: 5-18.
78. Reeh ES, Ross GK. Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: a strain gauge and finite element evaluation. Dent Mater 1994 10: 247-252.
79. Fritz UB et al. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adesive system. Quint Int 1998 29: 567-572.
80. Dennison JB et al. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Pnsthet Dent 2000 84: 499-505.
81. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1998 18: 217-225.
82. Magne P, Douglas WH. Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses. Int J Prosth 2000 13: 117-124.