Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle adhesive system

Quintessence International

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 567-572

  Fritz, Ulrike B ^a   Finger, Werner J ^a   Stean, Howard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bond strength; Enamel dentin adhesive; Marginal cavity adaptation; One bottle adhesive; Saliva contamination

Indexed keywords

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; 4 METHACRYLOXYETHYLTRIMELLITIC ACID; 4-METHACRYLOXYETHYLTRIMELLITIC ACID; ADHESIVE AGENT; CHARISMA; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TRICARBOXYLIC ACID; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SALIVA; TIME;

ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; POLYURETHANES; RESIN CEMENTS; SALIVA; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TRICARBOXYLIC ACIDS;

EID: 0032159395     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hörsted-Bindslev P, Asmussen E. Esthetic restorations. In: Hörsted-Bindslev P, Mjör IA (eds). Modern Concepts in Operative Dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1988:189-246.
2. Roulet J-F. Adhesive techniques: The standard for the restoration of anterior teeth. In: Degrange M, Roulet J-F (eds). Minimally Invasive Restorations With Bonding. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:17-30.
3. Hickel R. Der Kofferdam-nach wie vor Notwendigkeit? Phillip J 1997;14:363-365.
4. El-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:83-87.
5. Roeder LB, Sichanthavong J, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to contaminated dentin [abstract 423]. J Dent Res 1997; 76:66.
6. Nascimento ABL, Reis JIL, Fontana U. Effects of saliva contamination on shear bond strength to dentin [abstract 424]. J Dent Res 1997;76:66.
7. Finger WJ, Fritz UB. Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with one-component UDMA/HEMA adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:183-186.
8. Finger WJ, Fritz UB, Podszun W. Cavity adaptation of resin composite bonded with UDMA/HEMA-based adhesives. Proceedings of a conference on clinically appropriate alternatives to amalgam: Biophysical factors in restorative decision making. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:248.
9. Gwinnett AJ. The scientific basis of the sealant procedure. J Prev Dent 1976;3:15-28.
10. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995; 4:28-32.
11. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-299.
12. Pashley EL, Tao L, Mackert JR, Pashley DH. Comparison of in vivo vs. in vitro bonding of composite resin to the dentin of canine teeth. J Dent Res 1988;67:467-470.
13. Hansen EK, Munksgaard EC. Saliva contamination vs. efficacy of dentin bonding agents. Dent Mater 1989;5:329-333.
14. Pashley DH, Nelson R, Kepler EE. The effects of plasma and salivary constituents on dentin permeability. J Dent Res 1982; 61:978-981.
15. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: Its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:127-129.
16. Finger WJ, Lee KS, Podszun W. Monomers with low oxygen inhibition as enamel/dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12:256-261.