Influence of post placement in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated incisors veneered with direct composite

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 180-184

  Baratieri, Luiz Narciso ^a   De Andrada, Mauro Amaral Caldeira ^b   Arcari, Gilberto Müller ^b   Ritter, André V ^b,c,d  

^a Head of Operative Dentistry Section   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; MAXILLA; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTAL VENEERS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0034244647     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000.108415     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:437-40.
2. Radz GM. Creating natural vitality with direct-bonded composite veneers. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:62-70.
3. Baratieri LN, Monteiro J Jr, Andrada MA, Arcari GM. Composite veneers: a new technique. Quintessence Int 1992;23:237-43.
4. Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Andrada MAC, Vieira LC, Cardoso AC, Ritter AV. Esthetics: direct adhesive restorations on fractured anterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1998. p. 430.
5. Kreulen CM, Creugers NH, Meijering AC. Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies. J Dent 1998;26:345-53.
6. Welbury RR. A clinical study of a microfilled composite resin for labial veneers. Int J Paediatr Dent 1991;1:9-15.
7. Dietschi D. Free-hand composite resin restorations: a key to anterior esthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-25.
8. Magne P, Holz J. Stratification of composite restorations: systematic and durable replication of natural esthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;6:61-8.
9. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. Composite laminate veneers: a clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 1988;13:439-54.
10. Baratieri LN, Coral Neto AC, Monteiro J Jr, Andrada MA, Cardoro Vieira LC. The sandwich technique, an alternative treatment for tetracycline-stained teeth: a case report. Quintessence Int 1991;24:929-33.
11. Sivers JE, Johnson WT. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:631-50.
12. Ross RS, Nicholls J, Harrington GW. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endod 1991;17:450-6.
13. Thorsteinsson TS, Yaman P, Craig RG. Stress analyses of four prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:30-3.
14. Maltz TM, Tronstad L. Fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated teeth. End Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-11.
15. Hunter A, Flood AM. The restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Health 1989;70:17-21.
16. Sato EF, Fischman DM, Santos J Jr. Who is responsible for the failure in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth? Rev Paul Odont 1987;9:12-6.
17. Bex RT, Parker MW, Judkins JT, Pellew GB Jr. Effect of dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:768-72.
18. Marshak BL, Helft H, Filo R. Factors mitigating against the use of dowels in endodontically treated teeth. Quintessence Int 1988;19:417-21.
19. Mohey el-Din, el-Khodery A, el-Badhdady YM, Ibrahim RM. A comparative study of restorative techniques used to reinforce intact endodontically treated anterior teeth. Egypt Dent J 1990;36:193-205.
20. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-5.
21. Zmener O. Comparative analysis of threaded intra-canal posts. Rev Gaœcha de Odont 1979;27:268-74.
22. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls J. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-cores. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:507-514.
23. Kantor ME, Pines MS. A comparative study of restorative techniques for pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:405-12.
24. Guzy GE, Nicholls J. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
25. Chalifoux PR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: review, classification, and post design. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:247-54.
26. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:535-43.
27. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
28. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-4.
29. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-5.
30. Conover WJ. Practical nonparametrical statistics. New York: John Wiley; 1971. p. 464.