Effect of irrigation solutions on dentin bonding agents and restorative shear bond strength

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 628-632

  Sung, Eric C ^a,d   Tai, Eddie T ^a,b   Chen, Toni ^a,c   Caputo, Angelo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; HERCULITE XR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; ONE-STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; OPTIBOND SOLO; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTIN; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; POLYMERIZATION; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SHEAR STRENGTH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH CROWN; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; INSTRUMENTATION; LAVAGE; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; IRRIGATION; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WATER;

EID: 0036596576     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.124205     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Powers JM, Fingers WJ, Xie J. Bonding of composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995;4:28-32.
2. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:127-9.
3. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998;11:281-5.
4. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Resin permeation into acid-conditioned, moist, and dry dentin: a paradigm using water-free adhesive primers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1034-44.
5. Charlton DG, Beatty MW. The effect of dentin surface moisture on bond strength to dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 1994;19:154-8.
6. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-9.
7. Schilke R, Lisson JA, Bauss O, Geurtsen W. Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. Arch Oral Biol 2000;45:355-61.
8. National primary drinking water regulation by office of ground water and drinking water. USEPA Part 141. Available at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl. html. Accessed on February 22, 2001.
9. Roberts HW, Karpay RI, Mills SE. Dental unit waterline antimicrobial agents' effect on dentin bond strength. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:179-83.
10. McEntegart MG, Clark A. Colonisation of dental units and water bacteria. Br Dent J 1973;134:140-2.
11. Abel LC, Miller RL, Micik RE, Ryge G. Studies on dental aerobiology. IV. Bacterial contamination of water delivered by dental units. J Dent Res 1971;50:1567-9.
12. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 1991.