Apprentice scholarly writing in a community of practice: An intraview of an NNES graduate student writing a research article

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-79

  Yongyan, Li ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147203760     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00040.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Angelova, M., & Riazantseva, A. (1999). "If you don't tell me, how can I know?": A case study of four international students learning to write the U.S. way. Written Communication, 16, 491-525.
2. Bailey, K. M. (2001). What my EFL students taught me. The PAC Journal, 1, 7-31.
3. Bazerman, C. (1984). The writing of scientific non-fiction: Contexts, choices, constraints. Pre/Text, 5, 39-74.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (1992). The informed writer: Using sources in the disciplines (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Becher, T. (1987). Disciplinary discourse. Studies in Higher Education, 12, 261-274.
8. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Research students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-24.
9. Belcher, D., & Braine, G. (Eds.). (1995). Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). You are what you cite: Novelty and inter-textuality in a biologist's experimental article. In C. Berkenkotter & T. N. Huckin (Eds.), Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power (pp. 45-60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
12. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T. N., & Ackerman, J. (1991). Social context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 191-215). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
13. Blakeslee, A. M. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 125-169.
14. Braine, G. (2002). Academic literacy and the nonnative speaker graduate student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 59-68.
15. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
16. Canagarajah, A. S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601-626.
17. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002a). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002b). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
19. Canagarajah, A. S. (2003a). Practicing multiliteracies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 151-179.
20. Canagarajah, A. S. (2003b). A somewhat legitimate and very peripheral participation. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education (pp. 197-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Casanave, C. P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Casanave, C. P. (1998). Transitions: The balancing act of bilingual academics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 175-203.
23. Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Casanave, C. P. (2003a). Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called "post-process"?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 85-102.
25. Casanave, C. P. (2003b). Multiple uses of applied linguistics literature in a multidisciplinary graduate EAP class. ELT Journal, 57, 43-50.
26. Chang, Y.-Y., & Swales, J. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 145-167). London: Longman.
27. Casanave, C. P., & Vandrick, S. (2003). Preface. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education (pp. xi-xv). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Dong, Y. R. (1996). Learning how to use citations for knowledge transformation: Non-native doctoral students' dissertation writing in science. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 428-457.
29. Faigley, L., Cherry, R. D., Jolliffe, D. A., & Skinner, A. M. (1985). Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholars. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 127-150.
31. Flowerdew, J. (2002). Ethnographically inspired approaches to the study of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 235-252). Harlow, England: Longman.
32. Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y.-Y. (in press). Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics.
33. Freedman, A. (1987). Learning to write again: Discipline-specific writing at university. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 4, 95-116.
34. Friedlander, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of a first language on writing in English as a second language. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 109-125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's Box. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Gosden, H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: A social constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purpose, 14, 35-57.
37. Gosden, H. (1996). Verbal reports of Japanese novices' research writing practices in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 109-128.
38. Graves, H. B. (1995). Rhetoric and reality in the process of scientific inquiry. Rhetoric Review, 14, 106-125.
39. Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11, 43-84.
40. Hu, J. M. (2001). The academic writing of Chinese graduate students in science and engineering: Processes and challenges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
41. Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433-454.
42. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
43. Johns, A. M. (Ed.). (2002). Destabilizing and enriching novice students' genre theories. In A. M.Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp. 237-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1998). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell.
45. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the construclivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
46. Kramsch, C., & Lam, W. S. E. (1999). Textual identities: The importance of being non-native. In G. Braine (Ed.), Non-native educators in English language teaching (pp. 57-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Lather, P. A. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
48. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Law, J., & Williams, R. J. (1982). Putting facts together: A study of scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 12, 535-558.
50. Li, Y.-Y. (2004, December). Establishing an academic writing program for science doctoral students in China: Necessity and proposal. Paper presented at The 18th International Language and Education Conference, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong SAR, China.
51. Li, Y.-Y. (2005). Multidimensional enculturation: The case of an EFL Chinese doctoral student. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 15, 153-170.
52. Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35-53.
53. Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 15-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.
55. Myers, G. (1985). Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science, 15, 593-630.
56. Myers, G. (1988). The social construction of science and the teaching of English: An example of research. In P. C. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and product (pp. 143-150). London: Modern English.
57. Nelson, J. (1993). The library revisited: Exploring students' research processes. In A. M. Penrose & B. M. Sitcoe (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201-230.
59. Penrose, A. M., & Sitcoe, B. M. (Eds.). (1993). Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive research in the college writing classroom. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61. Riazi, A. (1997). Acquiring disciplinary literacy: A social-cognitive analysis of text production and learning among Iranian graduate students of education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 105-137.
62. Rymer, J. (1988). Scientific composing process: How eminent scientists write. In D. A. Jolliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research, Volume Two: Writing in academic disciplines, (pp. 211-250). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Scollon, R. (1995). Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society, 24, 1-28.
64. Sharpe, L. (1997). Participant verification. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.; pp. 314-315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students' composing process. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 189-206.
66. St. John, M. (1987). Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes, 6, 113-120.
67. Swales, J. (1987). Utilizing the literatures in teaching the research paper. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 41-68.
68. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Swales, J. (1998). Language, science and scholarship. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 8, 1-18.
70. Thompson, D. K. (1993). Arguing for experimental "facts" in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written Communication, 10, 106-128.
71. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (Eds.). (1996). Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
72. Walker, R. (1985). Doing research. London: Methuen.
73. Walvoord, B. E., & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
74. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.