Acquiring Disciplinary Literacy: A Social-Cognitive Analysis of Text Production and Learning among Iranian Graduate Students of Education

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 105-137

  Riazi, Abdolmehdi ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0007271550     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90030-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ackerman, J. (1989). Students' self-analyses and judges' perceptions (Technical Report No. 23). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Writing.
2. Ackerman, J. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334-370.
3. Anson, C.M. (1988). Toward a multidimensional model of writing in the academic disciplines. In D.A. Joliff (Ed.), Advances in writing research, Vol. 2: Writing in disciplines (pp. 1-33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write: Studies in writer's block and other composing problems (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Benson, P.J., & Heidish, P. (1995). The ESL technical experts: Writing processes and classroom practices. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 313-330). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Berkenkotter, C. (1991). Paradigm debate, turfwars, and the conduct of sociocognitive inquiry in composition. College Composition and Communication, 42, 151-169.
7. Berkenkotter, C., Huckin, T.N., & Ackerman, J. (1988). Conventions, conversations, and the writer: Case study of a student in a rhetoric Ph.D. program. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 9-44.
8. Berlin, J. (1988), Rhetoric and ideology in writing classes. College English, 50, 477-494.
9. Bizzell, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. PRE/TEXT, 3, 213-243.
10. Casanave, C.P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33-49.
11. Chamot, A.U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 22, 13-24.
12. Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81-141.
13. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482-511.
14. Currie, P. (1993). Entering a disciplinary community: Conceptual activities required to write for one introductory course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 101-117.
15. Faigley, L., & Hansan, K. (1985). Learning to write in social sciences. College Composition and Communication, 36, 140-149.
16. Flower, L. (1987). The role of task representation in reading-to-write (Technical Report No. 2). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Writing.
17. Flower, L. (1989). Cognition, context, and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40, 282-311.
18. Flower, L., Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, M.J., McCormick, K., & Peck, W.C. (1990). Reading-to-write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Freedman, A. (1987). Learning to write again: Discipline-specific writing at university. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 4, 95-116.
20. Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
21. Freedman, S.W. (1987). Response to student writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
22. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
23. Herrington, A. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the context for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-361.
24. Herrington, A.J. (1988). Teaching, writing, and learning: A naturalistic studying of writing in an undergraduate literature course. In D.A. Joliffe (Ed.). Advances in writing research, Vol. 2: Writing in academic disciplines (pp. 133-166). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Higher Education Advisory of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1994). Education system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ottawa: Office of Higher Education Advisory.
26. Hornberger, N.H. (1994). Ethnography. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Alternatives in TESOL research: Descriptive, interpretive, and ideological orientations. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 673-703.
27. International Student Center (1994). ISC Newsletter, 23, 1. University of Toronto, Canada.
28. Knoblauch, C.H. (1988). Rhetorical constructions: Dialogue and commitment. College English, 50, 125-140.
29. Langer, J.A. (1986). Learning through writing: Study skills in the content areas. Journal of Reading, 29, 400-406.
30. Langer, J.A. & Applebee, A.N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31. Leki, I. (1994). ESL students' strategies for coping with writing assignments across the disciplines. Paper presented at TESOL '94 Convention, Baltimore, March.
32. Nelson, J. (1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. (Technical Report No. 43). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Writing.
33. Nelson, J., & Hayes, J.R. (1988). How writing context shapes college students' strategies for writing from sources (Technical Report No. 16). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Center for the Study of Writing.
34. Newell, G.E. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study of protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 265-287.
35. Newell, G.E. (1986). Writing, reasoning and learning: Examining the connections. The English Connection, 37, 14-17.
36. Odell, L. (1980). The process of writing and the process of learning. College Composition and Communication, 31, 42-50.
37. Odell, L., Goswami, D., & Herrington, A. (1983). The discourse-based interview: A procedure for exploring the tacit knowledge of writers in non-academic settings. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research on writing (pp. 221-236). New York: Longman.
38. O'Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Poole, D. (1992). Language socialization in the second language classroom. Language Learning, 42, 593-616.
41. Prior, P. (1991). Contextualizing writing and response in a graduate seminar. Written Communication, 8, 267-310.
42. Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 407-430.
43. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' performances for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11, 46-70.
44. Schumacher, G.M., & Nash, J.G. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 67-96.
45. Seidel, J. (1988). The ethnograph: A user's guide. Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
46. Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students' composing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 189-206.
47. Silva, T. (1990). Second language instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing; Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 657-677.
49. Sternglass, M.S., & Pugh, S.L. (1986). Retrospective accounts of language and learning processes. Written Communication, 3, 297-323.
50. Sternglass, M.S. (1993). Writing development as seen through longitudinal research. Written Communication, 10, 235-261.
51. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: The Falmer Press.
52. Wenden, A.L. (1991). Metacognitive strategies in L2 writing: A case for task knowledge. In J.E. Alatis(Ed.), Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics 1991 (pp. 302-322), Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
53. Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.