Verbal Reports of Japanese Novices' Research Writing Practices in English

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 109-128

  Gosden, Hugh ^a  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008937088     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90021-1     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Belson, W. (1981). The design and understanding of survey questions. Aldershot, England: Gower.
2. Bizzell, P. (1987). Language and literacy. In T. Enos (Ed.), A sourcebook for basic writing teachers (pp. 125-137). New York: Random House.
3. Bloch, J., & Chi, L. (1995). A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 231-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others' words: Using background reading texts in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 211-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics. 11, 211-247.
7. Cohen, A. (1987). Studying learner strategies: How we get the information. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 31-40). New York: Prentice-Hall.
8. Day, R. (1979). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia: ISI.
9. Deckert, G. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 131-148.
10. Dennett, J. (1988). Not to say is better than to say (a Japanese proverb): How rhetorical structure reflects cultural context in Japanese-English technical writing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 31, 116-119.
11. Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.
12. Eggington, W. (1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 153-168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
14. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
15. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
16. Gilbert, G., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Gosden, H. (1992). Research writing and NNSs: From the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 123-139.
18. Gosden, H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: A social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes. 14, 37-57.
19. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 54-81). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
20. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M.A.K. Halliday & J. Martin, Writing science: Literary and discursive power (pp. 124-132). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Hinds, J. (1990). Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Thai. In U. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 87-109). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
23. Holmes, J., & Ramos, R. (1991). Talking about learning: Establishing a framework for discussing and changing learning processes. In C. James & P. Garrett (Eds.), Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 198-212). London: Longman.
24. Huckin, T., & Olsen, L. (1983). English for science and technology: A handbook for non-native speakers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Huckin, T., & Olsen, L. (1984). On the use of informants in LSP discourse analysis. In A. Pugh & J. Uljin (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes: Studies and practices in native and foreign languages (pp. 120-129). London: Heinemann.
26. Huckin, T., & Olsen, L. (1991). Technical writing and professional communication for NNSs. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Johns, A. (1990a). L1 composition theories: Implications for developing theories of L2 composition. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 24-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Johns, A. (1990b). Coherence as a cultural phenomenon: Employing ethnographic principles in the academic milieu. In U. Connor & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 211-226). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
29. Johnson, D. (1992). Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts. Applied Linguistics, 13, 51-71.
30. Journet, D. (1990). Writing, rhetoric, and the social construction of scientific knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 33, 162-167.
31. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
32. Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: Translation versus direct composition. Language Learning, 42, 183-215.
33. Krapels, A. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 37-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35. Liebman, J. (1992). Toward a new contrastive rhetoric: Differences between Arabic and Japanese rhetorical instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 141-165.
36. McDaniel, B. (1994). The role of contrastive rhetoric in teaching professional communication in English as a second or foreign language. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37, 29-33.
37. Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-426.
38. Mauranen, A. (1993a). Cultural differences in academic discourse - problems of a linguistic and cultural minority. In L. Löfman, L. Kurki-Suonio, S. Pellinen, & J. Lehtonen (Eds.), The competent intercultural communicator (pp. 157-174). Jyväskylä, Finland: Association Finlandaise de Linguistique Appliquée.
39. Mauranen, A. (1993b). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish - English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3-22.
40. Myers, G. (1985). Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biology articles. Social Studies of Science, 15, 593-630.
41. Myers, G. (1988). The social construction of science and the teaching of English: An example of research. In P.C. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and product (ELT Documents 129, pp. 133-150). Basingstoke, England: Modern English Publications/British Council.
42. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10, 1-35.
43. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison, WA: University of Wisconsin Press.
44. Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
45. Negishi, M., & Adachi, J. (1991). Overseas acceptance of Japanese scientific papers as seen in a citation analysis. Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Japanese Information in Science, Technology, and Commerce. Nancy, France: INIST-CNRS.
46. Nelson, G., & Murphy, J. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171-193.
47. Okamura, A. (1994). The role of subculture and language in letter writing in an academic community. Paper presented at the 1994 IATEFL Conference. Brighton, England.
48. Pennington, M. (1993). A critical examination of word processing effects in relation to L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 227-255.
49. Pennington, M., & So, S. Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of six Singaporean university student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 41-63.
50. Scott, J. (1987). English-language physics literature from Japan. Paper presented at the 1987 International Conference on Japanese Information in Science, Technology, and Commerce. Warwick, England.
51. Selinker, L. (1979). On the use of informants in discourse analysis and "language for specialized purposes." International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 17, 189-215.
52. Selzer, J. (1993). Understanding scientific prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
53. Shaw, P. (1991). Science research students' composing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 189-206.
54. Sionis, C. Communication strategies in the writing of scientific research articles by non-native users of English. English for Specific Purposes, 14, 99-113.
55. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22, 29-51.
56. St. John, M. (1987). Writing processes of Spanish scientists publishing in English. English for Specific Purposes, 6, 113-120.
57. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59. Taylor, G., & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319-336.
60. Trelease, S. (1982). How to write scientific and technical papers. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
61. Ventola, E., & Mauranen, A. (1991). Non-native writing and native revising of scientific articles. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Recent systemic and other functional views on language (pp. 457-492). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
62. Weissberg, R., & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
63. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six ease histories. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.