Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 298-313

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a   Cunningham, Douglas W ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; AUTOMATISM; BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REVIEW; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMATISM; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33947619432     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0085-z     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Avraamides, M. N., & Ioannidou, L. M. (2005). Locating targets from imagined perspectives: Labeling vs. pointing. In Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy (pp. 175-180). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology. London: Academic.
3. Boer, L. C. (1991). Mental rotation in perspective problems. Acta Psychologica, 76(1), 1-9.
4. Bremmer, F., & Lappe, M. (1999). The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion. Experimental Brain Research, 127(1), 33-42.
5. Brockmole, J. R., & Wang, R. X. F. (2003). Changing perspective within and across environments. Cognition, 87(2), B59-B67.
6. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 168-178.
7. Christou, C., & Bülthoff, H. (1999). The perception of spatial layout in a virtual world (Tech. Rep. No. 75). Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik. (Available: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ= 1540).
8. Christou, C., Tjan, B., & Bülthoff, H. (1999). Viewpoint information provided by familiar environment facilitates object identification (Tech. Rep. No. 68). Max-Planck-Institut für biologische Kybernetik. (Available: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=1536).
9. Christou, C. G., Tjan, B. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2003). Extrinsic cues aid shape recognition from novel viewpoints. Journal of Vision, 3, 183-198. (http://www.journalofvision.org/3/3/1).
10. Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 246-250.
11. de Vega, M., & Rodrigo, M. J. (2001). Updating spatial layouts mediated by pointing and labelling under physical and imaginary rotation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(3), 369-393.
12. Dichgans, J., & Brandt, T. (1978). Visual vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, & H.L. Teuber (Eds.), Perception (vol. VIII, pp. 756-804). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
13. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8(4), 302-307.
14. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(2), 483-500.
15. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of bodycentered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 227-233.
16. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. H. (2000). The automatic updating of egocentric spatial relationships and its impairment due to right posterior cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 585-595.
17. Farrell, M. J., & Thomson, J. A. (1998). Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 637-654.
18. Hettinger, L. J. (2002). Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In K. M. Stanney (Ed.), Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 471-492). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Hintzman, D. L., O'Dell, C. S., & Arndt, D. R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 149-206.
20. Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition, 13(3), 208-217.
21. Holmes, M. C., & Sholl, M. J. (2005). Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning. Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 1069-1087.
22. Ivanenko, Y. P., Viaud-Delmon, I., Siegler, I., Israël, I., & Berthoz, A. (1998). The vestibulo-ocular reflex and angular displacement perception in darkness in humans: adaptation to a virtual environment. Neuroscience Letters, 241(2-3), 167-170.
23. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychology Science, 9(4), 293-298.
24. Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (1998). Visually controlled locomotion: Its dependence on optic flow, three-dimensional space perception, and cognition. Ecological Psychology, 10(3-4), 271-285.
25. Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Philbeck, J. W., & Fukusima, S. S. (1996). Visual perception of location and distance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(3), 72-77.
26. May, M. (1996). Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beiträge, 38(3/4), 418-434.
27. May, M. (2000). Kognition im Umraum [cognition in spatial surroundings]. Wiesbaden: DUV: Kognitionswissenschaft.
28. May, M. (2001). Mechanismen räumlicher Perspektivwechsel [mechanisms of spatial perspective switches]. In R. K. Silbereisen & M. Reitzle (Eds.), Psychologie 2000 (pp. 627-634). Lengerich: Pabst.
29. May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 163-206.
30. May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(1), 169-186.
31. McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 87-121.
32. Mou, W. M., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30(1), 142-157.
33. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23(12), 1447-1455.
34. Riecke, B. E., & von der Heyde, M. (2002). Qualitative modeling of spatial orientation processes using logical propositions: Interconnecting spatial presence, spatial updating, piloting, and spatial cognition (Tech. Rep. No. 100). MPI for Biological Cybernetics (Avaliable: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/ publication.html?publ=2021).
35. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). How real is virtual reality really? Comparing spatial updating using pointing tasks in real and virtual environments. Journal of Vision, 1(3), 321a (http://www.journalofvision.org/1/3/321/).
36. Riecke, B. E., van Veen, H. A. H. C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Visual homing is possible without landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11(5), 443-473.
37. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Spatial updating in real and virtual environments contribution and interaction of visual and vestibular cues. In ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) (pp. 9-17). Los Angeles, USA. (Available: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2764).
38. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005a). Perceiving simulated ego-motions in virtual reality comparing large screen displays with HMDs. In B. E. Rogowitz, T. N. Pappas, & S. J. Daly (Eds.), SPIE invited paper on VALVE: Vision, action, and locomotion in virtual (and real) environments (pp. 344-355). San Jose, CA, USA.
39. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005b). Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. In Proceedings of IEEE VR2005 (pp. 131-138). Bonn, Germany.
40. Riecke, B. E., Västfjäll, D., Larsson, P., & Schulte-Pelkum, J. (2005c). Topdown and multimodal influences on self-motion perception in virtual reality. In Proceedings of HCI International 2005. Las Vegas, NV, USA.
41. Riecke, B. E., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005d). Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 2(3), 183-215.
42. Riecke, B. E., Schulte-Pelkum, J., & Caniard, F. (2006). Using the perceptually oriented approach to optimize spatial presence & egomotion simulation. In Handbook of Presence. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum (submitted).
43. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(6), 1157-1165.
44. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., & Carr, W. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 215-226.
45. Schulte-Pelkum, J., Riecke, B. E., Caniard, F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2006). Influence of brief physical accelerations and vibrations on visually induced linear vection (manuscript in preparation).
46. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of 3-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701-703.
47. Sholl, M. J., & Bartels, G. P. (2002). The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning. Memory and Cognition, 28(3), 422-436.
48. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology.Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(6), 1494-1507.
49. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9(4), 315-320.
50. Simons, D. J., Wang, R. X. F., & Roddenberry, D. (2002). Object recognition is mediated by extra-retinal information. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(4), 521-530.
51. Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422-437.
52. Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 1051-1063.
53. Wang, R. F. (1999). Representing a stable environment by egocentric updating and invariant representations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 431-445.
54. Wang, R. F. (2005). Beyond imagination: Perspective change problems revisited. Psicologica, 26(1), 25-38.
55. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 376-382.
56. Wang, R. X. F., & Brockmole, J. R. (2003). Human navigation in nested environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 398-404.
57. Wang, R. X. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70(2), 191-210.
58. Wang, R. X. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77(3), 215-250.
59. Warren, R., & Wertheim, A. H. (Eds.) (1990). Perception & control of self-motion. New Jersey, London: Erlbaum.
60. Warren, W. H., Kay, B. A., Zosh, W. D., Duchon, A. P., & Sahuc, S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4(2), 213-216.
61. Wong, S. C. P., & Frost, B. J. (1981). The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steadystate visually induced subjective rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 228-236.
62. Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: An advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29(5), 993-1005.
63. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(1), 151-168.
64. Wraga, M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2004). Spatial updating of virtual displays during self and display rotation. Memory & Cognition, 32(3), 399-415.
65. Yardley, L., & Higgins, M. (1998). Spatial updating during rotation: The role of vestibular information and mental activity. Journal of Vestibular Research. Equilibrium and Orientation, 8(6), 435-442.