Extrinsic cues aid shape recognition from novel viewpoints

Journal of Vision

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 183-198

  Christou, Chris G ^a   Tjan, Bosco S ^b   Büelthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer graphics; Context; Extrinsic cues; Shape recognition; View dependency; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; ROTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION;

EID: 0038134943     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/3.3.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bartram, D. J. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 325-356.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
4. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
5. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 19, 1162-1182.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
7. Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S. Y., & Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5(3), 247-260.
8. Bülthoff, H.H., & Christou, C. G. (2000). The perception of spatial layout in a virtual world. In S.W. Lee, H.H. Bülthoff, T. Poggio (Eds.), Biologically Motivated Computer Vision. Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop, BMCV 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1811, (10-19), Berlin: Springer.
9. Bülthoff, H. H., & van Veen, H. A.H.C. (2001). Vision and Action in Virtual Environments: Modern Psychophysics in Spatial Cognition Research. In M. Jenkins, L. Harris (Eds.), Vision and Attention, New York: Springer.
10. Cave, C. B., & Kosslyn S. M. (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22, 229-248.
11. Christou, C. G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning. Memory & Cognition, 27, 996-1007.
12. Christou, C. G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Using realistic virtual environments in the study of spatial encoding. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, K.F. Wender. (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II. Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1849, (317-332) Berlin: Springer.
13. Eckstein, M. P., Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(3), 425-451.
14. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
15. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K. & Goodale M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition, Current Biology 8, 9:1315-1318.
16. Hinton, G. E., & Parsons, L. M.(1988) Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30 (1), 1-35.
17. Humphrey, G. K., & Jolicoeur, P. (1993). An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 1, 137-159.
18. Humphrey, G. K., & Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
19. Jolicoeur, P., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In V. Walsh and J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual Constancy: Why things look as they do, (pp. 69-123) Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
20. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
21. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
22. Logothetis, N. K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
23. Maguire, E.A., Burgess, N., Donnett, J. G., Frackowiak, R. S, Frith, C. D., & O'Keefe, J. (1998). Knowing where and getting there: A human navigation network. Science, 280, 921-924.
24. Marr, D. (1982). Vision, San Francisco: Freeman.
25. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
26. Palmer, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation, In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.) Object Perception: Structure and Process, (pp. 121-161) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and Form, Academic Press: London.
28. Rock, I. & Di Vita, J., & Barbeito, R (1981). The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 719-732.
29. Rock, I., & DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered object perception, Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
30. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science, 171, 701-703.
32. Simons, D.J., & Wang, R.F. (1998) Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
33. Simons, D.J., Wang, R.X.F. & Rodenberry, D (1998) Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information. Perception and Psychophysics, 64(4), 521-530.
34. Srinivas, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19,582-602
35. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
36. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.