Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in Virtual Reality

Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 131-138

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a   Schulte Pelkum, Jörg ^a   Caniard, Franck ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cues; Human factors; Motion simulation; Multi modal cue integration; Psychophysics; Self motion illusion; Spatial orientation; Vection; Vibrations; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER VISION; MOTION ESTIMATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; VIBRATION CONTROL;

AUDITORY CUES; HUMAN FACTORS; MOTION SIMULATION; MULTI-MODAL CUE INTEGRATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SELF-MOTION ILLUSION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VECTION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 28444452671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. W. Becker, S. Raab, and R. Jürgens. Circular vection during voluntary suppression of optokinetic reflex. Experimental Brain Research, 144(4):554-557, June 2002.
2. J. Dichgans and T. Brandt. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, editors, Perception, volume VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology, pages 756-804. Springer, 1978.
3. M. O. Ernst and M. S. Banks. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415:429-433, Jan. 2002.
4. H. Fushiki, S. Takata, and Y. Watanabe. Influence of fixation on circular vection. Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation, 10(3):151-155, 2000.
5. C. Hendrix and W. Barfield. The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3):290-301, 1996.
6. L. J. Hettinger. Illusory self-motion in virtual environments. In Kay M. Stanney, editor, Handbook of Virtual Environments, pages 471-492. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.
7. I. P. Howard and T. Heckmann. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of 2 competing visual-displays. Perception, 18(5):657-665, 1989.
8. I. P. Howard and A. Howard. Vection - the contributions of absolute and relative visual-motion. Perception, 23(7):745-751, 1994.
9. R. L. Klatzky, J. M. Loomis, A. C. Beall, S. S. Chance, and R. G. Golledge. Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychol. Sci., 9(4):293-298, 1998.
10. J. R. Lackner. Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 48(2):129-131, 1977.
11. P. Larsson, D. Västfjäll, and M. Kleiner. Perception of selfmotion and presence in auditory virtual environments. In Presence, (www.presence2004.org), 2004.
12. K. Lowther and C. Ware. Vection with large screen 3d imagery. In ACM CHI '96, pages 233-234, 1996.
13. S. Nakamura and S. Shimojo. Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception, 28(7):893-902, 1999.
14. J. D. Prothero. The Role of Rest Frames in Vection, Presence and Motion Sickness. PhD thesis, University of Washington, 1998. Available: www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-98-11/.
15. B. E. Riecke, J. Schulte-Pelkum, M. N. Avraamides, and H. H. Bülthoff. Enhancing the visually induced self-motion illusion (vection) under natural viewing conditions in virtual reality. In Presence, 2004. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html?publ=2864.
16. B. E. Riecke and M. von der Heyde. Qualitative modeling of spatial orientation processes using logical propositions: Interconnecting spatial presence, spatial updating, piloting, and spatial cognition. Technical Report 100, MPI for Biological Cybernetics, 2002. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/ publication.html?publ=2021.
17. B. E. Riecke, M. von der Heyde, and H. H. Bülthoff. Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflex-like spatial updating. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 2005. (submitted).
18. T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3):266-281, June 2001.
19. M. Slater. How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 13(4):484-493, August 2004.
20. F. A. M. van der Steen and P. T. M. Brockhoff. Induction and impairment of saturated yaw and surge vection. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(1):89-99, January 2000.
21. B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3):225-240, 1998.
22. S. C. P. Wong and B. J. Frost. The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3):228-236, 1981.