Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 521-530

  Simons, Daniel J ^a,b   Wang, Ranxiao Frances ^b   Roddenberry, David ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RETINA; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0036583602     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194723     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BIEDERMAN, I., & COOPER, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
2. BIEDERMAN, I., & GERHARDSTEIN, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
3. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S. Y., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 3, 247-260.
4. CHRISTOU, C., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1997). View-direction specificity in scene recognition after active and passive learning (Tech. Rep. No. 53). Tübingen: Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische Kybernetik.
5. COOPER, E. E., BIEDERMAN, I., & HUMMEL, J. E. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214.
6. DIWADKAR, V. A., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
7. DUHAMEL, J.-R., COLBY, D. L., & GOLDBERG, M. E. (1992), The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255, 90-92.
8. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
9. EPSTEIN, R., & KANWISHER, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
10. FARRELL, M. J., & ROBERTSON, I. H. (1998). Mental rotation and automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 227-233.
11. GALLISTEL, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
12. GOODALE, M. A., & MILNER, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in NeuroSciences, 15, 20-25.
13. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
14. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1998). Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 127, 398-415.
15. HUMPHREY, G. K., & KHAN, S. C. (1992) Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 170-190.
16. LANDAU, B., SPELKE, E. S., & GLEITMAN, H. (1984). Spatial knowledge in a young blind child. Cognition, 16, 225-260.
17. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., & PAULS, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
18. LOOMIS, J. M., KLATZKY, R. L., GOLLEDGE, R. G., CICINELLI, J. G., PELLIGRINO, J. W., & FRY, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
19. POLLACK, L., & NORMAN, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125-126.
20. RIESER, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
21. RIESER, J. J., & RIDER, E. A. (1991). Young children's spatial orientation with respect to multiple targets when walking without vision. Developmental Psychology, 27, 97-107.
22. ROCK, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
23. ROCK, I., & DIVITA, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
24. SHELTON, A. L., & MCNAMARA, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
25. SIMONS, D. J., & WANG, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
26. TANAKA, K. (1993). Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition Science, 262, 685-688.
27. TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
28. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
29. TARR, M. J., WILLIAMS, P., HAYWARD, W. G., & GAUTHIER, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint-dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
30. TONG, F., NAKAYAMA, K., VAUGHAN, J. T., & KANWISHER, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753-759.
31. ULLMAN, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
32. WANG, R. F., & SIMONS, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
33. WEHNER, R., & SRINIVASAN, M. V. (1981). Searching behavior of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 142, 315-318.