Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 64-69

  Shor, Alexander ^a   Nicholls, Jack I ^a   Phillips, Keith M ^a   Libman, Warren J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; FUNCTION TEST; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAXILLA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TOOTH FILLING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); DENTAL BONDING; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK Z250; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RELYX ARC; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CERAMICS; COMPLIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH;

EID: 0037968199     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Petrie EM. An introduction to adhesive and sealants. In: Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000:2-49.
2. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1997;28:301-303.
3. Porte A, Lutz F, Lund M, Schwartz M, Cochran M. Cavity designs for composite resins. Oper Dent 1984;9:50-58.
4. Eakle WS. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with Class II bonded composite resin. J Dent Res 1983;65:149-153.
5. Hansen EK. In vivo cusp fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with MOD amalgam or MOD resin fillings. Dent Mater 1988;4:169-173.
6. White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, Sangsurasak S. In vivo microleakage of luting cements for cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:333-338.
7. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: Structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997;25:441-458.
8. Tay FR, Gwinett AJ, Wei SHY. The overwet phenomenon: A scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:109-114.
9. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, et al. Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: Interfacial ultra-structure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:9-28.
10. Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Vanherle G. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper Dent 1992;(suppl 5):111-124.
11. Davidson CL, DeGee AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stresses. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
12. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
13. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
14. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:167-171.
15. Dietschi D, Spearfico R. Classifications of techniques and restorative strategies. In: Adhesive Metal-Free Restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:61-77.
16. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 1997;13:146-150.
17. Morin DL, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-1078.
18. Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, DeLong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Experimental strain measurement. Dent Mater 1988;4:41-48.
19. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restorative technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-1544.
20. Fissore B, Nicholls JI, Yuodelis RA. Load fatigue of teeth restored by a dentin bonding agent and a posterior resin composite. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:80-85.
21. Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cusp reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:641-645.
22. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:346-353.
23. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998;3:137-146.
24. Kramer N, Frankenberg R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - A clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-331.
25. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restorative Dent 2001;13:50-57.
26. Cowan AJ, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ, Wilson NHF. A practice-based, Class I/II randomized controlled trial: Initial findings [abstract 1320]. J Dent Res 2001;80:200.